A
Alberti_Devoveo
Guest
Freemasonry is anti-Catholic and anti-Christian by nature. They maintain and profess the heretical “watch-maker” version of God, a la “The Supreme Architect of the Universe” of Calvin. It is for this reason that the Church forbids Freemasons from receiving the Eucharist.Following up on the thread and combining it with another:
I think we can agree (or at least become silent on this issue) that if a person belongs to an extremist group or a pro choice group then that person can legitimately receive the sacraments and we may (or may not) remind him of the error of his ways.
A person that is a Freemason cannot receive the sacrament (by decree from the Holy See).
Why arent we applying the same standards? I personally dont see why the Freemason cannot receive the Eucharist but a member of a hate group seems to be totally entitled to it.
I can see the Holy See not getting involved in every little groups right to exist but the USCCB hasnt even issued a policy statement on the issue.
Just wondering why.
Unless I am mistaken, hate groups & pro-life groups do not hold heretical positions, just morally wrong ones. No heresy, no need to ban them. However, as has been stated a few times in the thread, one should point out the morally erroneous position they hold in hopes of correcting their stance and their return to Fullness in the Church.