M
malphono
Guest
The issue of ad orientem and versus populum in the Oriental CCs (mainly but not exclusively in the US) has come up from time to time in a variety of threads, but after a discussion I had yesterday (which I’m not going into here), I decided that it’s time for a separate thread about it. (I wanted to do this as a poll, but it seems to me the number of options involved gets a little out of hand, so thread it is.)
First off, In case anyone cares and either doesn’t know or hasn’t figured it out, I am of the ad orientem school. Always have been, always will be, and I sincerely believe it is an important issue.
That said, I know that the Maronites are tainted with versus populum, even in the Patriarchal Territories. No, it is NOT a Synodal requirement: ad orientem remains an option and is actually used in certain places outside the US. (While I have not seen it with my own eyes, there are, (or so I am told), a few “maverick priests” in the US who use ad orientem, at least when the bishop is not around.)
I have, as well, witnessed one case of the Syriac qourobo done versus populum (in the US) but I don’t know if that was an anomaly or if it’s a common practice. Also, from what I understand, the Chaldeans (ublished photos of Christmas from Iraq showed the Alatrs ad orientem, but what about outside Iraq?) and Syro-Malabars (in the US, at least) are afflicted in way similar to the Maronites, but I really do not know to what extent that’s true. And I am totally unaware of what is done among the Armenians.
What I’m looking for here is some feed back from those who frequent Chaldean, Syro-Malabar, Syriac, Maronite, and Armenian CC churches as to which posture is used and where the church is located. (I have no intention of being intrusive, so the name of the eparchy and the country is quite enough).
BTW, those who frequent Eastern CCs and have an ad orientem vs* versus populum* tale, are welcome to share it here too.
First off, In case anyone cares and either doesn’t know or hasn’t figured it out, I am of the ad orientem school. Always have been, always will be, and I sincerely believe it is an important issue.
That said, I know that the Maronites are tainted with versus populum, even in the Patriarchal Territories. No, it is NOT a Synodal requirement: ad orientem remains an option and is actually used in certain places outside the US. (While I have not seen it with my own eyes, there are, (or so I am told), a few “maverick priests” in the US who use ad orientem, at least when the bishop is not around.)
I have, as well, witnessed one case of the Syriac qourobo done versus populum (in the US) but I don’t know if that was an anomaly or if it’s a common practice. Also, from what I understand, the Chaldeans (ublished photos of Christmas from Iraq showed the Alatrs ad orientem, but what about outside Iraq?) and Syro-Malabars (in the US, at least) are afflicted in way similar to the Maronites, but I really do not know to what extent that’s true. And I am totally unaware of what is done among the Armenians.
What I’m looking for here is some feed back from those who frequent Chaldean, Syro-Malabar, Syriac, Maronite, and Armenian CC churches as to which posture is used and where the church is located. (I have no intention of being intrusive, so the name of the eparchy and the country is quite enough).
BTW, those who frequent Eastern CCs and have an ad orientem vs* versus populum* tale, are welcome to share it here too.