S
sea_oat
Guest
No offense, but I’m glad you mentioned Bart Ehrman, since this paragraph looks like it came STRAIGHT out of his book, “Misquoting Jesus.”Anyway, am I supposed to lie to myself and pretend that there haven’t been thousands of changes, additions, and deletions from the thousands of earlier manuscripts of the Bible over the centuries? That is a documented fact, should I bury my head in the sand?
Bart Ehrman is obviously a good scholar, but he’s not an infallible one. No one is. Even worse, his popular books (specificaly “Misquoting Jesus”) are presented as scholarly points and facts slathered with a generous amount of his opinion.
He was a fundamentalist Christian who believed the Bible should be literally taken word-for-word. Not surprisingly, his faith started quickly crumbling after encountering even small scribal error issues. It doesn’t mean yours has to, too.
There are a lot of excellent scholars who don’t have the same faith issues he has. Bruce Metzger, for example, who was Ehrman’s teacher, and who was pretty much the top Biblical scholar before Ehrman even registered on the academic radar, never lost his Presbyterian faith as far as I know.
Since Ehrman has such a hard time keeping his own opinions out of his scholarship, it’s hardly a wonder why so many of his readers have swallowed his opinions and personal faith issues along with his points.