Thank you for clarity on the Catholic teaching of this point, in particular, reincarnation vs. resurrection…
… I don’t take your article as incorrect, as I am merely learning, but the implication is that case is closed, never to be opened again, even if it were in error when debated and even if new evidence is found that speaks against it.
Thank you for the consideration.
[Whit, I cut out a lot of what you wrote to conserve space.]
To summarize what you said, if you’ll allow me the liberty of reading between the lines and making judgments into your mind that might well be fallacious (so correct me if I’m wrong), you yourself are intrigued by the notion of reincarnation, you politely infer that the Church has little basis on which to found its teaching on the subject, a scant single line of text, it should be more open to the wisdom of Eastern cultures where reincarnation is believed, it appears to be unreasoning, arbitrary, close-minded, and to hide behind a cloak of infallibility, and likely will not change its opinion even when confronted with evidence to the contrary, although you hope this is not true.
You may be right, but I don’t believe so. There is no evidence for the debate, although you hold out for evidence that may appear someday in the future. Jesus certainly did not teach reincarnation. He did teach about hell, however, and so does the Bible in many places, a teaching that is incompatible with the Eastern idea of reincarnation. He taught about heaven, too. Also, if you recall, he descended into the netherworld where he freed the souls of the just who had been waiting for the gates of heaven to be reopened. They were not busy reincarnating, no, they were waiting in this place between earth and heaven for the Messiah to appear and free them.
On the resurrection of the dead, yes, the case is closed.
Here is how the one Catholic source puts it:
The creeds and professions of faith and conciliar definitions do not leave it doubtful that the resurrection of the body is a dogma or an article of faith. We may appeal, for instance, to the Apostles’ Creed, the so-called Nicene and Athanasian Creeds, the Creed of the Eleventh Council of Toledo, the Creed of Leo IX, subscribed by Bishop Peter and still in use at the consecration of bishops the profession of faith subscribed by Michael Palaeologus in the Second Council of Lyons, the Creed of Pius IV, and the Decree of the Fourth Lateran Council (c. “Firmiter”) against the Albigenses. This article of faith is based on the belief of the Old Testament, on the teaching of the New Testament, and on Christian tradition.
newadvent.org/library/almanac_thisrock94.htm
I found you a little article (below) in the Catholic Encyclopedia that talks briefly about Nirvana, Karma and reincarnation. The Catholic Church does not ignore Eastern thought. Catholic scholars have studied the belief systems of others and have formed very clear critiques of them in light of the revelation of Jesus Christ. I’m sure you can find plenty of material on Eastern thought from a Catholic perspective. Oh, and by the way, I, too, am an auditor, or was in my past life (that is to say, before I retired).

Peace.
In Buddhism, nirvana is the final state the soul reaches on its journey through different lifetimes. These lifetimes are pictured as a series of lamps, one being lit by another, until the final lamp goes out. The word “nirvana” means “going out” or “extinguishing.”
According to Buddhists, our desires and cravings are what keep the process of reincarnation going. By eliminating all desires it is possible to escape the cycle of rebirth. When a person manages to extinguish all his desires, he reaches a state of nirvana and is said to be a saint.
When a saint dies he enters nirvana proper, in which he loses his identity as a distinct individual. Buddha compared the question “Does a saint survive his death?” to the question “Where does a flame go when it is blown out?” Both questions are thought to be intrinsically unanswerable. Neither a dead saint nor a blown-out flame have individual identities anymore.
Nirvana is different from the Christian idea of heaven. Nirvana is a state of desirelessness; heaven is a state of havings one’s most fundamental desire (for God) fulfilled. Nirvana is a state of ultimate apathy and indifference, heaven of ultimate joy and fulfillment. Paradoxically, Buddhists regard nirvana, the state of desirelessness, as the most desirable state.
Nirvana also differs from heaven because it suggests one will eternally lose his body and his individual identity, while Christians claim they will keep both of them eternally.
newadvent.org/cathen/12792a.htm