Orthodox and Catholic...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zundrah
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I said it again. Orthodox Christianity has priests,monks people speaking with God, Jesus, St MAry, saints and angels like maybe right now through Jess paryer. If any Church would have such people and would listen to them, the Union would be very easy to realize since issues will get resolution from God.
 
Would you suppose that the converse could be applied as well? Should Catholics look at the Orthodox view instead of positing their views on the Orthodox view (as some ECs are wont to do in regards to reconciling doctrine w/Rome).
I agree. For instance, I am offput by any arguments on both sides of the divide that are merely hypocritical (like polemics about which Church is more united). But can you be more concrete with your point by giving an example?

Blessings
 
I agree. For instance, I am offput by any arguments on both sides of the divide that are merely hypocritical (like polemics about which Church is more united). But can you be more concrete with your point by giving an example?

Blessings
Well, in regards to the Immaculate Conception. Many Catholics (especially Latins; not so much from ECs) like to try to fit the Catholic understanding of it into an Orthodox mold, if you will. I don’t think that does any good, just as it does no good for Orthodox Christians to judge Catholic theology from an Orthodox lens. We are all human and make mistakes, and God is gracious to us all. But I find it hypocritical from Catholics (of any stripe) to say that Orthodox are misrepresenting them, when they are guilty of judging and scrutinizing Holy Orthodoxy from their Catholic perspective.

In Christ,
Andrew
 
Well, in regards to the Immaculate Conception. Many Catholics (especially Latins; not so much from ECs) like to try to fit the Catholic understanding of it into an Orthodox mold, if you will. I don’t think that does any good, just as it does no good for Orthodox Christians to judge Catholic theology from an Orthodox lens. We are all human and make mistakes, and God is gracious to us all. But I find it hypocritical from Catholics (of any stripe) to say that Orthodox are misrepresenting them, when they are guilty of judging and scrutinizing Holy Orthodoxy from their Catholic perspective.

In Christ,
Andrew
I don’t see it like you are describing (although there have been situations like you say) I see Catholics saying, you believe Mary was without sin and so do we. We have common ground. But Orthodox tend to get defensive, as to not appear to be like Catholics. I don’t mean it as an insult, I find it sad. I talked to a Melkite priest that had no problems reconciling Western and Eastern beliefs. I just wish more were open to it, because Jesus prayed for unity. And it would be an awesome day if it happened.
 
I said it again. Orthodox Christianity has priests,monks people speaking with God, Jesus, St MAry, saints and angels like maybe right now through Jess paryer. If any Church would have such people and would listen to them, the Union would be very easy to realize since issues will get resolution from God.
Not sure what you mean. The Catholic Church has all of this as well.
 
I don’t see it like you are describing (although there have been situations like you say) I see Catholics saying, you believe Mary was without sin and so do we. We have common ground. But Orthodox tend to get defensive, as to not appear to be like Catholics. I don’t mean it as an insult, I find it sad. I talked to a Melkite priest that had no problems reconciling Western and Eastern beliefs. I just wish more were open to it, because Jesus prayed for unity. And it would be an awesome day if it happened.
I see what you’re saying and I don’t find it as an insult.🙂 It’s not that we don’t want to look like we’re not Catholic, it’s because there truly is a different understanding, no matter how much people would like to spin it. I, too, would like to see unity, but I want it to be a true unity. I would hate for it to be something like many of the Protestants are doing, such as “You believe in Jesus? Me, too!” In doing so they forsake other aspects of their credence.

Many times, I hear Catholics say “Oh, you believe Mary is sinless. That means you believe in the Immaculate Conception. You believe it, but you just don’t know it!” That to me is ridiculous. Catholics get excited and start saying unity is just around the bend, because from their perspective we’re on the same level. However, one cannot look at Holy Orthodoxy from any other lens then that of Holy Orthodoxy. Else, it is wishful thinking and illusions. There is a different understanding. I get annoyed when Orthodox do the same thing. You cannot judge Catholicism fairly through the lens of another, as Mardukm pointed out.

I could not reconcile post-schism Western beliefs with Eastern beliefs, which is why I chose to become Orthodoxy. It took a while for the schism to take place and it will take time to heal. All in God’s time. His will be done!

In Christ,
Andrew
 
Dear brother Harpazo,
Well, in regards to the Immaculate Conception. Many Catholics (especially Latins; not so much from ECs) like to try to fit the Catholic understanding of it into an Orthodox mold, if you will. I don’t think that does any good, just as it does no good for Orthodox Christians to judge Catholic theology from an Orthodox lens. We are all human and make mistakes, and God is gracious to us all. But I find it hypocritical from Catholics (of any stripe) to say that Orthodox are misrepresenting them, when they are guilty of judging and scrutinizing Holy Orthodoxy from their Catholic perspective.
Thanks for the concrete example. On the issue of the IC, I find both Latins and EO at fault for perpetuating the division over the issue (certain Latins even moreso).

Certain Latins claim that the IC means that Mary did not die, or that if she did die, it was only by a willful submission to death, not that she could have died.

In response, EO claim that this violates the Eastern understanding of Original Sin, and thus reject the IC as a heresy.

On this matter, I find the EO more consistent. However, I fault both sides for not studying the actual teaching of the IC because the IC actually does not address the physical consequences of original sin, but only the spiritual effects (loss of sanctifying grace, original justice, and communion with God).

Another example comes from the CO perspective. HH Pope Shenoute has publicly asserted that any teaching that would make Mary’s conception not have a natural cause as if she did not have a real father is to be rejected. Of course, Catholics agree, since Pope Benedict XIV in the 17th century formally condemned the belief that Mary did not have a natural birth. So to think that the teaching of the IC means Mary was not born naturally is a misrepresentation of the Catholic teaching.

In truth, there is nothing wrong with the condemnations made by the Orthodox per se. The problem comes when they think these condemnations properly apply to the actual teaching of the IC.

Blessings,
Marduk
 
Many times, I hear Catholics say “Oh, you believe Mary is sinless. That means you believe in the Immaculate Conception. You believe it, but you just don’t know it!” That to me is ridiculous.
Agreed, and that’s good to point out. Such statements certainly do not automatically lead to a belief in the IC. There is enough testimony from the early Fathers for the belief that are more explicit without appealing to statements that can go either way.

Blessings,
Marduk
 
I see what you’re saying and I don’t find it as an insult.🙂 It’s not that we don’t want to look like we’re not Catholic, it’s because there truly is a different understanding, no matter how much people would like to spin it. I, too, would like to see unity, but I want it to be a true unity. I would hate for it to be something like many of the Protestants are doing, such as “You believe in Jesus? Me, too!” In doing so they forsake other aspects of their credence.

Many times, I hear Catholics say “Oh, you believe Mary is sinless. That means you believe in the Immaculate Conception. You believe it, but you just don’t know it!” That to me is ridiculous. Catholics get excited and start saying unity is just around the bend, because from their perspective we’re on the same level. However, one cannot look at Holy Orthodoxy from any other lens then that of Holy Orthodoxy. Else, it is wishful thinking and illusions. There is a different understanding. I get annoyed when Orthodox do the same thing. You cannot judge Catholicism fairly through the lens of another, as Mardukm pointed out.

I could not reconcile post-schism Western beliefs with Eastern beliefs, which is why I chose to become Orthodoxy. It took a while for the schism to take place and it will take time to heal. All in God’s time. His will be done!

In Christ,
Andrew
I forgot to add, there is a Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church near me that has a school called Immaculate Conception school. 😃

I understand your point and I do appreciate your response. Thanks.
 
Yikes Joe, that’s crazy! Why don’t you just become Catholic! :D;)
I almost did. I met with my local Catholic priest several times and was scheduled to begin RCIA. God had other plans. 😉

Yours in Christ
Joe
 
Agreed, and that’s good to point out. Such statements certainly do not automatically lead to a belief in the IC. There is enough testimony from the early Fathers for the belief that are more explicit without appealing to statements that can go either way.

Blessings,
Marduk
There are statements that Mary is immaculate. I think the issue is sometimes we try and read modern definitions of terms back into patristic quotes. You read a quote in which a Church father calls Mary immaculate and the assumption is that father meant the 1854 dogmatic definition of the term. I don’t think that’s an assumption (no pun intended) you can realistically make.

That is the point we are trying to make. No matter how many quotes you marshal in defense of a Catholic dogma, such as the Immaculate Conception or Papal Infallibility, you can not show that belief was dogmatically defined prior to the schism. You can not expect the Orthodox to accept anything as dogma that was not defined as such prior to 1054. 👍

Yours in Christ
Joe
 
Dear brother josephdaniel,
There are statements that Mary is immaculate. I think the issue is sometimes we try and read modern definitions of terms back into patristic quotes. You read a quote in which a Church father calls Mary immaculate and the assumption is that father meant the 1854 dogmatic definition of the term. I don’t think that’s an assumption (no pun intended) you can realistically make.
I understood what brother Harpazo meant. And I’m not talking about quotes on the Immaculateness of Mary. Would you like a list of what I’m talking about?
That is the point we are trying to make. No matter how many quotes you marshal in defense of a Catholic dogma, such as the Immaculate Conception or Papal Infallibility, you can not show that belief was dogmatically defined prior to the schism. You can not expect the Orthodox to accept anything as dogma that was not defined as such prior to 1054. 👍
My defense for the teaching of the IC in this or any other forum is only to persuade people to agree that it is not a heresy. Baby steps.😃

Though you say Orthodox will not accept anything as dogma that was not defined prior to 1054, you gotta admit that EO polemicists are often very dogmatic about points that they reject about Latin Catholicism. For instance, the issue of the use of unleavened bread, purgatorial fire, original sin, the state of the blessed in heaven, distinction of Essence and Energies, etc., etc. ,etc. The differences on these matters were all present in the united Church of the first millenium, and they did not divide the Church. Yet nowadays, many EO have dogmatically proclaimed that these differences are now to be regarded as reasons for disunity. So you’ve got dogmatists in your fold too, and they have a LOT more dogmas in their repertiore of “cause for separation” than the Catholics do.😛 😉

Blessings,
Marduk
 
I forgot to add, there is a Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church near me that has a school called Immaculate Conception school. 😃
Obviously this term is meant to be interpreted exactly as you understand it. 🙂

This is a testimony to the prior Latinization of Greek Catholics, and a means to reaffirm their “Catholicity” to the wider Latin Catholic community (which for many decades had a hard time accepting Greek Catholics on equal terms).

Since the 1950’s/1960’s there have been less and less new examples such as this.
 
Obviously this term is meant to be interpreted exactly as you understand it. 🙂

This is a testimony to the prior Latinization of Greek Catholics, and a means to reaffirm their “Catholicity” to the wider Latin Catholic community (which for many decades had a hard time accepting Greek Catholics on equal terms).

Since the 1950’s/1960’s there have been less and less new examples such as this.
Leave it to you to sow seeds of contention. :rolleyes:

I can commune in their Church and they in mine, it’s a beautiful thing. Praise be to Jesus Christ, now and forever!!
What’s the problem? Does it really bother you that much that people of East and West can praise God together and recieve the Eucharist together?
Obviously, it does.
 
Dear brother Hesychios,
Obviously this term is meant to be interpreted exactly as you understand it. 🙂

This is a testimony to the prior Latinization of Greek Catholics, and a means to reaffirm their “Catholicity” to the wider Latin Catholic community (which for many decades had a hard time accepting Greek Catholics on equal terms).

Since the 1950’s/1960’s there have been less and less new examples such as this.
It was in the Ukraine that the Brotherhood of the Immaculate Conception was establised by St. Dimitry Rostov. Isn’t it possible that the Ukrainians are simply being faithful to their Traditions?

Blessings,
Marduk
 
=Eucharisted;5644257]They aren’t in communion with the Church.
They don’t believe the Catholic Church is the Catholic Church.
They don’t accept any new councils.
They don’t consider Saint Augustine to be credible (he’s “too Catholic”)
They don’t have the same Church Fathers
They don’t believe apparitions can give messages
They don’t care if our sacraments are valid
They don’t believe in a purifying fire after death
They don’t believe you can say how the Eucharist happens
They don’t regard the Pope as the Supreme Pontiff
They don’t like Latin and or anything Western (“Latinization”)
Some believe in a “Great Revelation” some so-called saint gave
Some believe a so-called fire descends from Heaven in Jesus’ tomb (but they forbid Catholics from witnessing it)
Some believe they are superior to Catholics (“We are what you once were and you are what we are not”)
Some bash Catholics quite a lot on their websites
Some seem to be taught lies about Catholics by their priests
***“From the time of Diotrephes (3 John 1:9-10) there have been continual schisms, of which the greater number were in the East. Arianism produced a huge schism; the Nestorian and Monophysite schisms still last. However, the Eastern Schism always means that most deplorable quarrel of which the final result is the separation of the vast majority of Eastern Christians from union with the Catholic Church, the schism that produced the separated, so-called “Orthodox” Church.” Catholic Encypodeia ***

…but what makes them different? [The Orthodox Catholic churches]
They aren’t in [full] communion with the Church.
They don’t believe the Catholic Church is the [only and or the “one”] Catholic Church.
They don’t accept any new councils. [from the Council of Florence in 1472]
They don’t consider Saint Augustine to be credible (he’s “too [Roman] Catholic”)
They don’t have the same Church Fathers [Yet we recognize theirs]
They don’t believe apparitions can give messages
They don’t care if our sacraments are valid [this statement is a bit too strong]
They don’t believe in a purifying fire after death [Purgatory]
They don’t believe you can say how the Eucharist happens [Transubstaniation]
They don’t regard the Pope as the Supreme Pontiff
They don’t like Latin and or anything Western (“Latinization”)
Some believe in a “Great Revelation” some so-called saint gave
Some believe a so-called fire descends from Heaven in Jesus’ tomb (but they forbid Catholics from witnessing it)
Some believe they are superior to Catholics (“We are what you once were and you are what we are not”)
Some bash Catholics quite a lot on their websites [very sad but also very true]
Some seem to be taught lies about Catholics by their priests [perhaps?]***

Love and prayers,
Pat
 
**
…but what makes them different? [The Orthodox Catholic churches]
They aren’t in [full] communion with the Church [who is in communion with the Bishop of Rome].
They don’t believe the Catholic Church is the [only and or the “one”] Catholic Church.
They don’t accept any new councils. [from the Council of Florence in 1472][There are also Eastern and Oriental Catholics who don’t accept all the Councils after the 7th as “Ecumenical”]
They don’t consider Saint Augustine to be credible (he’s “too [Roman] Catholic”) [not true]
They don’t have the same Church Fathers [Yet we recognize theirs]
They don’t believe apparitions can give messages [not true]
They don’t care if our sacraments are valid [this statement is a bit too strong]
They don’t believe in a purifying fire after death [Neither do the Eastern and Oriental Catholics]
They don’t believe you can say how the Eucharist happens [Transubstaniation] [you’re the first two Catholic apologists I have heard claim that Transubstantiaion explains HOW the Eucharist happens]**
They don’t regard the Pope as the Supreme Pontiff
They don’t like Latin and or anything Western (“Latinization”) [sadly, this bias does exist, though I have met Latin Catholics who have the same bias against the East and Orient]
Some believe in a “Great Revelation” some so-called saint gave
Some believe a so-called fire descends from Heaven in Jesus’ tomb (but they forbid Catholics from witnessing it)
Some believe they are superior to Catholics (“We are what you once were and you are what we are not”) [There are Latin Catholics who also have a superiority complex towards the Easterns and Orientals]
Some bash Catholics quite a lot on their websites [very sad but also very true]
Some seem to be taught lies about Catholics by their priests [perhaps?][Latin Catholics also misrepresent Orthodoxy]

Blessings
 
Dear brother Hesychios,

It was in the Ukraine that the Brotherhood of the Immaculate Conception was establised by St. Dimitry Rostov. Isn’t it possible that the Ukrainians are simply being faithful to their Traditions?

Blessings,
Marduk
I guess it just seems to really irritate some people that some in the Ukraine may actually BELIEVE in the IC.

And, not to mention, the BVM appeared to the believers in the Ukraine and urged them to pray the Rosary for peace. But I guess that’s a Latinization too? 🤷
 
I almost did. I met with my local Catholic priest several times and was scheduled to begin RCIA. God had other plans. 😉

Yours in Christ
Joe
God had other plans?

…then in that case, let the Lord be with you. :cool: Josephdanie, Christ is with you. 😃
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top