Orthodox and the Blessed Virgin Mary

  • Thread starter Thread starter BernadetteM
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
****(12 Main Feasts of Orthodoxy)

In the services of Orthodox church 12 great holidays of the yearly liturgical cyle not including Feast of all Feasts, Holy Paskha. This are celebrated for Jesus Christ and for Mother of God. These are: 1. Birth Most Holy Mother of God, 2. Erection Holy Cross of Lord, 3. Entrance in Temple of Most Holy Mother of God, 4. Birth of Christ, 5. Baptism of Lord , 6. Meeting of Lord, 7. Announcement to Holy Mother of God. 8. Entrance of Lord to Ieruslaem, 9. Assumption of Lord, 10. Trinity - Pentecost, 11. Transformation of the Lord, 12. Falling Asleep of Most Holy Mother of God.
Thanks, Volodymyr. 🙂
 
The beliefs of the Roman Catholic Church are indeed the beliefs of the Catholic Church. Likewise, the beliefs of the Chaldean, Melkite, Maronite, Coptic, Armenian, etc. are also indeed the beliefs of the Catholic Church. The beliefs of each particular Catholic Church is the beliefs of the universal Catholic Church. In other words, the faith of the Latin Church is the same faith of the Eastern and Oriental Catholic Churches. We have one faith descended from the Apostles.
Amen!
 
Rony-

Thank you for these references! I’ve been pretty disciplined in my book buying lately so maybe I can get one or two.
That’s alright, many people confuse us with our Byzantine Catholic brethren and their Eastern Orthodox counterparts, even professors of theology.
By the way, my particular Chaldean Catholic Church of the East neither has her origins in an Orthodox Church, nor is our theology, liturgy, spirituality, and disciplines, basically Orthodox.
I have understood that Melkite Catholics also do not have their origin in an Orthodox Church. I think I should stop there and “cut my losses”. 🙂 I was originally trying to not go too far afield with heading down the what are ECCs path. I think it’s foolish of me to think one can mention it at all without opening up the complexities of the topic.

(I’m looking at the “Reference threads” question our moderator posed some time ago and I see that most of us said we’d like to have Reference threads in the Eastern Catholicism section which would be of some help. I also see most of us responded with “but I probably won’t be able to help.” So that makes it hard to get those anytime soon.)
When they don’t make that mistake, they make the next subsequent mistake, and that is, they assume that the issues that the Greek and Latin Christians commonly debate over are the same issues that concern us Assyro-Chaldeans, when often times, they are inapplicable to us.
The heritage outside of Orthodoxy I had an idea of but I’m really ignorant beyond that and so glad you have mentioned this as something to be aware of, and hopefully to learn something about.
For theology, I’m still waiting for the future formation of a particular catechism for the Chaldean Catholic Church, which should become a good source of our particular theology.
Is there one in the offing? That would be great. I know the
Ukrainian Greek Catholics anticipate their Catechism next year, which many of us are looking forward to.
If you ever get a chance to meet Bishop Mar Bawai Soro, he can help answer any question you might have on our Assyrian-Chaldean tradition. He is one of the brightest bishops our Catholic Church of the East has in her hierarchy.
Stranger things have happened… we may meet. Father Robert Taft, S.J. seems to agree with you. 🙂

Thanks again for taking the time to pass on these references and you very helpful observations/comments.

God bless-
Marylouise
 
I have understood that Melkite Catholics also do not have their origin in an Orthodox Church.
I think you mean the Maronite Catholic Church.
(I’m looking at the “Reference threads” question our moderator posed some time ago and I see that most of us said we’d like to have Reference threads in the Eastern Catholicism section which would be of some help. I also see most of us responded with “but I probably won’t be able to help.” So that makes it hard to get those anytime soon.)
Pardon my ignorance, but what is a Reference thread?
 
Mardukum is an apostate Orthodox who regularly deludes himself so as to justify his apostacy. He claims to speak for Coptic Orthodoxy when in reality no Orthodox Copt would agree with him, and I know my share. My priest grew up a Copt and is now a priest in the Antiochian Orthodox Church. Don’t let him feign otherwise.
Correct.
 
Peter-
I think you mean the Maronite Catholic Church.
Ugh. Too much multitasking, trying to not go another 2 days before saying “thank you!” to Rony. It’s not a good idea to be in a hurry when trying to write (or read) posts. You are right, I meant Maronite. I look at that in print and wonder how I even managed to type Melkite. Sigh. What did I say right after I typed that? “I should cut my losses” ! Too late. LOL
Pardon my ignorance, but what is a Reference thread?
Maybe someone else can do a better job than me answering that. I was thinking of this question and this example . We have the same basic questions that come up over and over. Someone could read the reference thread first and then get more clarification as needed by posting further questions.

-Mary Louise
 
I have understood that Melkite Catholics also do not have their origin in an Orthodox Church.
Actually, all churches which claim an Apostolic origin can be said to have been originally Orthodox, or at least proto-Orthodox.

That the Maronite church (if we agree you meant the Maronites) has no counterpart in Holy Orthodoxy is a different matter, and somewhat dependent upon the the Roman Catholic church considering them a unique rite, or church. The distinction is somewhat artificial.

In fact liturgically the Maronites do have a counterpart in the non-Chalcedonian Jacobite church, as well as the Syriac Catholic church. What makes them seem different is the very long separation which has allowed for some organic changes in their liturgy, plus some borrowings from elsewhere.

Historically, the Maronites seem to have separated from the Melkites, when that church was still using the Liturgy of Saint James. So the Melkites (both Catholic and Orthodox) can be considered a counterpart of the Maronites in that sense.
 
That the Maronite church (if we agree you meant the Maronites) has no counterpart in Holy Orthodoxy is a different matter, and somewhat dependent upon the the Roman Catholic church considering them a unique rite, or church. The distinction is somewhat artificial.
who or what can define a unique rite or church?
 
Actually, all churches which claim an Apostolic origin can be said to have been originally Orthodox, or at least proto-Orthodox.

That the Maronite church (if we agree you meant the Maronites) has no counterpart in Holy Orthodoxy is a different matter, and somewhat dependent upon the the Roman Catholic church considering them a unique rite, or church. The distinction is somewhat artificial.

In fact liturgically the Maronites do have a counterpart in the non-Chalcedonian Jacobite church, as well as the Syriac Catholic church. What makes them seem different is the very long separation which has allowed for some organic changes in their liturgy, plus some borrowings from elsewhere.

Historically, the Maronites seem to have separated from the Melkites, when that church was still using the Liturgy of Saint James. So the Melkites (both Catholic and Orthodox) can be considered a counterpart of the Maronites in that sense.
Hmm, I never really thought about that, but now that you mention it, it does make sense. I think had the Maronites not been so heavily latinized by the Roman Church, their liturgy would resemble the Syriac Orthodox’s liturgy.

I owe my Maronite priest a lot of credit for pointing me to Orthodoxy. He was a firm believer that such recent Marian dogmas were completely unnecessary and that they did not fit with authentic Eastern Christianity. The funny thing is that for his Masters in Theology, his thesis was how the Immaculate Conception doctrine had no place in Syriac Christianity. He got his Masters and defended it so well, that the board (who were Oblates of the Immaculate Conception, ironically enough!:eek:) recommended to his bishop that he have a chance to study in Rome. 😛

In case it hasn’t been mentioned already, the Orthodox feel that it is not necessary to elevate the Mother of God higher than us. The reason we do not jive with certain Catholic beliefs is that they like to make her the “great exception” as opposed to the “great example.”

A great book to read on this would be a little book written by St. John of Shanghai and San Francisco (whose feast it was last week).

Hope that helps!

In Christ,
Andrew
 
In case it hasn’t been mentioned already, the Orthodox feel that it is not necessary to elevate the Mother of God higher than us. The reason we do not jive with certain Catholic beliefs is that they like to make her the “great exception” as opposed to the “great example.”
As it relates to the fact of her motherhood of God, Mary is indeed the Great Exception. You’ll have an impossible time from the Fathers proving otherwise.

As it relates to her as the model of the Church (which is such an explicit teaching of the Latin Church that you have no rhyme or reason to deny it), Mary is the Great Example.

Hope that helps.

Blessings
 
In case it hasn’t been mentioned already, the Orthodox feel that it is not necessary to elevate the Mother of God higher than us. The reason we do not jive with certain Catholic beliefs is that they like to make her the “great exception” as opposed to the “great example.”
I highly, highly doubt the validity of this statment.
 
Oh great! Another non-Coptic Orthodox chiming in to give an unfounded opinion. BTW, an apostate is one who denies the essentials of Christianity. It seems you are ignorant of that universal definition?

Blessings
 
You are saying that the Latin Church does not view St Mary as the great exception?
not referring to that:

referring too:

the Orthodox feel that it is not necessary to elevate the Mother of God higher than us

come on man, be realistic.

its found within Scrpiture and Tradition:

Luke 1:48 Because he hath regarded the humility of his handmaid; for behold from henceforth all generations shall call me blessed. 49 Because he that is mighty, hath done great things to me; and holy is his name.

She’s named in the Creed, and in the Mass:

**Priest ***(in a low voice):*So that they may be to those who partake of them for vigilance of soul, forgiveness of sins, communion of Your Holy Spirit, fulfillment of the kingdom of heaven, confidence before You, and not in judgment or condemnation. Again, we offer this spiritual worship for those who repose in the faith, forefathers, fathers, patriarchs, prophets, apostles, preachers, evangelists, martyrs, confessors, ascetics, and for every righteous spirit made perfect in faith.

**Priest: **Especially for our most holy, pure, blessed, and glorious Lady, the Theotokos and ever virgin Mary.
 
not referring to that:

referring too:

the Orthodox feel that it is not necessary to elevate the Mother of God higher than us

come on man, be realistic.
I believe he was saying that it is not necessary for any new doctrines to elevate St Mary. Scripture and Tradition already tells us that she is the Panaghia.

Come on man! 😃
 
I believe he was saying that it is not necessary for any new doctrines to elevate St Mary. Scripture and Tradition already tells us that she is the Panaghia.

Come on man! 😃
they are not new, just developed. 😃
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top