Orthodox and the Blessed Virgin Mary

  • Thread starter Thread starter BernadetteM
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Okie dokie. :rolleyes:
How different do the various Orthodox Churches take on the BVM and St. Stephen in terms of their "full of graces"ness.?

Luke 1
28 And the angel being come in, said unto her: Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women.

Acts Of Apostles 6
8 And Stephen, full of grace and fortitude, did great wonders and signs among the people

What is the difference between how full one is verse the other? Or when one was full of grace?
 
How different do the various Orthodox Churches take on the BVM and St. Stephen in terms of their "full of graces"ness.?

Luke 1
28 And the angel being come in, said unto her: Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with thee: blessed art thou among women.

Acts Of Apostles 6
8 And Stephen, full of grace and fortitude, did great wonders and signs among the people

What is the difference between how full one is verse the other? Or when one was full of grace?
First of all, the Orthodox believe that St Mary was sinless. But they do not accept the IC doctrine–you know that. Secondly, “full of grace” is an inaccurate translation in Luke 1. “Highly favored” or perhaps even “completely graced” would be more accurate. But then, I am not one to start arguing linguistic translations.

Do you agree with this definition from Rome for the IC?

…we declare, pronounce and define that the doctrine which holds that the Most Blessed Virgin Mary from the first moment of her conception was, by the singular grace and privilege of Almighty God, in view of the merits of Christ Jesus the Saviour of the human race, preserved immune from all stain of original sin, is revealed by God and is therefore firmly and constantly to be believed by all the faithful.
 
First of all, the Orthodox believe that St Mary was sinless. But they do not accept the IC doctrine–you know that. Secondly, “full of grace” is an inaccurate translation in Luke 1. “Highly favored” or perhaps even “completely graced” would be more accurate. But then, I am not one to start arguing linguistic translations.
I am not an expert by any means in linguistics, but this is a good read on why “full of grace” is a more literal translation.
socrates58.blogspot.com/2006/07/luke-128-full-of-grace-immaculate.html
Do you agree with this definition from Rome for the IC?

…we declare, pronounce and define that the doctrine which holds that the Most Blessed Virgin Mary from the first moment of her conception was, by the singular grace and privilege of Almighty God, in view of the merits of Christ Jesus the Saviour of the human race, preserved immune from all stain of original sin, is revealed by God and is therefore firmly and constantly to be believed by all the faithful.
Amen.
 
All dogmas, revealed truths, require accent; yes.
…we declare, pronounce and define that the doctrine which holds that the Most Blessed Virgin Mary from the first moment of her conception was, by the singular grace and privilege of Almighty God, in view of the merits of Christ Jesus the Saviour of the human race, preserved immune from all stain of original sin, is revealed by God and is therefore firmly and constantly to be believed by all the faithful.]

Intersting. Markudm once said that he does not subscribe to the part highlighted in blue.
 
All dogmas, revealed truths, require accent; yes.
Anyway, as you know, I highly honor/venerate Our Lady, the greatest of the saints. She was the picture of virtue and purity. Through an act of free will and the grace of God, she chose not to sin. She was a great example to mankind–not the great exception.

At this point, I am bowing out of the discussion because I always get suspended when I begin refutation of the Latin doctrine of the IC. I enjoy conversing with you, (and others), and I do not want to be suspended again. :o

Prayers and blessings to you CR!

Mickey
 
Anyway, as you know, I highly honor/venerate Our Lady, the greatest of the saints. She was the picture of virtue and purity. Through an act of free will and the grace of God, she chose not to sin. She was a great example to mankind–not the great exception.

At this point, I am bowing out of the discussion because I always get suspended when I begin refutation of the Latin doctrine of the IC. I enjoy conversing with you, (and others), and I do not want to be suspended again. :o

Prayers and blessings to you CR!

Mickey
I’m sure you do, and praise be to God.

As far as the part I bolded, the doctrine, as you quoted above, may be expressed in Latin terms, but it is not a Latin-only concept, but part of the Catholic Church.
 
…we declare, pronounce and define that the doctrine which holds that the Most Blessed Virgin Mary from the first moment of her conception was, by the singular grace and privilege of Almighty God, in view of the merits of Christ Jesus the Saviour of the human race, preserved immune from all stain of original sin, is revealed by God and is therefore firmly and constantly to be believed by all the faithful.]

Intersting. Markudm once said that he does not subscribe to the part highlighted in blue.
You must really love debating me and getting refuted.😃 For a background to readers, brother Mickey is referring to a debate I had in an Orthodox website.

I never stated that I do not subscribe to the part highlighted in blue. What I stated was that the clause highlighted in blue would not have been necessary for me to accept the dogma. The reason is that Pope St. Athanasius teaches in his Books Against the Arians that the Grace of sinlessness was granted to many even before the Advent of Christ. Based on St. Athanasius’ words, I would accept the teaching of the IC even if the clause (that you highlighted in blue) was missing.

Blessings
 
Is there one in the offing? That would be great.
Marylouise,

In 1996, the Chaldean Catholic Church of the East and the Assyrian Church of the East signed a document known as the Joint Patriarchal Statement, in which this following was stated:

(ii) The formation of a “Joint Commission for Unity” that shall be
appointed respectively by both of their Holy Synods to function as a task
force in order to formulate and carry out a comprehensive
ecclesial-educational plan through which both the Chaldean and Assyrian
Churches of the East will be able to achieve the following objectives:
Code:
    a.  The development of a "Catechism of the Church of the East."

There has been no progress as of yet, but I’m still hoping that this catechism will eventually become a reality sometime in the future. Recent tensions between the two Churches have put a monkey wrench in this ecumenical process.
Stranger things have happened… we may meet. Father Robert Taft, S.J. seems to agree with you.
By the way, Bishop Mar Bawai Soro has written an article on the Virgin Mary, when he was then a bishop of the Assyrian Church of the East, and he touches on the Immaculate Conception. Here is a long pdf file that contains the article:

prounione.urbe.it/pdf/f_prounione_bulletin_n54_fall1998.pdf

The IC is the section on pages 11-13. His treatment of the subject represents the traditional understanding of the Church of the East. He concludes the treatment in saying the following:

Thus there is considerable evidence of the convergence of the truth taught by the Church of the East and by the Papal Pronouncement of the Immaculate Conception. True there are distinct differences in philosophical and terminological constructs used to convey this theological and dogmatic truth. These differences can be ascribed to our human limitations and perhaps they are not totally irreconcilable, especially since both traditions hold that the sinlessness and the holiness of Mary are due to a unique preservative divine act.​

Very recently, he wrote another article in which he says:

Concerning Mary’s Immaculate Conception, the Church teaches that from the first moment of her life in the womb of her mother, Mary was preserved by God from all stain of sin, since she was to become the mother of the Son of God. This teaching finds its seed in the words of the angel at the annunciation when he calls Mary “full of grace” or “highly favored,” and when Elizabeth refers to her as “most blessed among women.” She who is God’s highly favored daughter, full of grace, most blessed, is free from all sin – she participates beforehand in the salvation won by Christ: she was redeemed from the moment of her conception, because she was preserved to become the place where God will dwell, thus, Mary is indeed “Second Heaven”.​

Thanks again for taking the time to pass on these references and you very helpful observations/comments.
You’re welcome, and God bless,

Rony
 
Hmm, I never really thought about that, but now that you mention it, it does make sense. I think had the Maronites not been so heavily latinized by the Roman Church, their liturgy would resemble the Syriac Orthodox’s liturgy.

I owe my Maronite priest a lot of credit for pointing me to Orthodoxy. He was a firm believer that such recent Marian dogmas were completely unnecessary and that they did not fit with authentic Eastern Christianity. The funny thing is that for his Masters in Theology, his thesis was how the Immaculate Conception doctrine had no place in Syriac Christianity. He got his Masters and defended it so well, that the board (who were Oblates of the Immaculate Conception, ironically enough!:eek:) recommended to his bishop that he have a chance to study in Rome. 😛

In case it hasn’t been mentioned already, the Orthodox feel that it is not necessary to elevate the Mother of God higher than us. The reason we do not jive with certain Catholic beliefs is that they like to make her the “great exception” as opposed to the “great example.”

A great book to read on this would be a little book written by St. John of Shanghai and San Francisco (whose feast it was last week).

Hope that helps!

In Christ,
Andrew
Hello Andrew,

I will admit that I am completely out of my expertise in the area of Orthodox beliefs about Mary. And I am a bit confused by your comment "The Orthodox feel that it is not necessary to elevate the Mother of God higher than us. The reason we do not jive with certain Catholic beliefs is that they like to make her the “great exception” as opposed to the “great example.”

When I went to St. Luke the Evangelist Orothodox Church’s website, which appears to be connected to the Russian Orthodox Church and read their Liturgy, the Entrance Prayers were quite atonishing to me.

Following are the Entrance Prayers for St. John Chrysostom Liturgy:

Deacon: O blessed Theotokos, open the doors of compassion to us whose hope is in YOU, that we may not perish but be delivered from adversity through you, who are the SALVATION of the Christian people.

Then the clergy venerate an icon of the Theotokos:

Deem us worthy of mercy O Theotokos, Fountain of Tenderness. Look on us sinful men and reveal your POWER as always, for we have put our HOPE in YOU.

These words are quite strong and to me it appears that the Orthodox do consider the Blessed Mother much higher than we do. I know that in the Latin rite liturgy I have never heard any part saying that we consider Mary our salvation. I know that the Catholic Church has considered calling Mary the Co-Redemdrix (sp), meaning that she carried Jesus and from her flesh He received His flesh and she brought our Salvation who is Christ Jesus into the world to save all mankind. This might be exactly what is meant in the Orthodox prayers. I find the prayers lovely, and have no real problem with them if they are orthodox and mean that through the Incarnation our Salvation came.

I am not familiar with our Easter Rite Churches so I can’t say anything about their liturgies, but find that from what I have read the Orthodox place Mary as high or even higher than the Catholic Church does. Of course their are saints who have written about Mary and held her in very high esteem, but those are private writings.

As I said before I am not familiar with what the Orthodox believe so in all charity I would appreciate it if someone would explain to me how we are really do different in our teachings about Christ’s Mother Mary.

I understand that the Orthodox would rather refer to many teachings as mysteries of the faith and that the Catholic Church has felt the need to define the mysteries of faith, but I think that in the end there really is no difference whether our Church says Mary was Immaculate from conception on or if the Orthodox choose to just believe that she was Immaculate and not define when. If by Entrance Prayers, this is not part of the liturgy, it really is not the point, the point is that the Orthodox do set Mary above all others except of course the Trinity.

I know that I do not possess all the great skills of debate that others of these boards do, so I will just read everyones’ answers if anyone chooses to post.

God Bless

Yours in the Hearts of Jesus and Mary

Bernadette
 
When I went to St. Luke the Evangelist Orothodox Church’s website,
If that is the one in Palos Hills I know it well
…which appears to be connected to the Russian Orthodox Church and read their Liturgy, the Entrance Prayers were quite atonishing to me.

Following are the Entrance Prayers for St. John Chrysostom Liturgy:

Deacon: O blessed Theotokos, open the doors of compassion to us whose hope is in you, that we may not perish but be delivered from adversity through you, who are the salvation of the Christian people.

Then the clergy venerate an icon of the Theotokos:

Deem us worthy of mercy O Theotokos, Fountain of Tenderness. Look on us sinful men and reveal your power as always, for we have put our hope in you.

These words are quite strong and to me it appears that the Orthodox do consider the Blessed Mother much higher than we do.
No, not in the same sense.

You have to understand this with an Orthodox mindset. That means we need to understand Theosis as the means to salvation. That idea is sometimes lost to Latin Catholics who tend to think of salvation as a static position once one has died. In other words Latin Catholics tend to think that once one has died, he or she gets a ticket and takes a seat, perhaps with Saint Mary of Nazareth up on stage introducing the main act.

But we know her to be a real person on the same journey as ourselves, and we are asking her to pray for us. She precedes us surely, and her prayers are very efficacious, we are convinced. We have nothing but the highest praise for her. I think that in many ways no one genuinely loves the Theotokos more than your typical Orthodox Christian. She is a heroine to us. We truly respect her and honor her. We see her as further along in this process than we.

So rather than see her up on stage, we see her as front row center, in the seats with us.

Our understanding is that there is an unbridgeable gap between ourselves and the Divine. We may narrow this gap, but never close it. No one can see God, even in death (and thus there is no such thing as a beatific vision). Theosis is an unending process, an eternal quest, a never ending yearning for God and approaching of God. So in life and in death we are on this journey of joy that never ends. Saint Mary has all the same limitations as the rest of us in this respect, she is a creature of God in hot pursuit of the Divine.

But we are all on the same narrow path. In that sense we all hope to eventually be right where the Theotokos is right now (and hopefully all of us further along), and perhaps the Holy Theotokos’ prayers (and yours) today will help us achieve that.
 
When I went to St. Luke the Evangelist Orothodox Church’s website,
If that is the one in Palos Hills I know it well. 🙂
…which appears to be connected to the Russian Orthodox Church and read their Liturgy, the Entrance Prayers were quite atonishing to me.

Following are the Entrance Prayers for St. John Chrysostom Liturgy:

Deacon: O blessed Theotokos, open the doors of compassion to us whose hope is in you, that we may not perish but be delivered from adversity through you, who are the salvation of the Christian people.

Then the clergy venerate an icon of the Theotokos:

Deem us worthy of mercy O Theotokos, Fountain of Tenderness. Look on us sinful men and reveal your power as always, for we have put our hope in you.

These words are quite strong and to me it appears that the Orthodox do consider the Blessed Mother much higher than we do.
No, not in the same sense.

I know that much of what the Latin Catholic church holds today originated in the east, many prayers and devotions erupted first in the eats and spread west. Even now there is often a reliance on eastern liturgy to try an understand what the early church believed.

We have to understand this with an Orthodox mindset. It is not wise to transfer eastern hymns of praise and laminate them to Latin preconceived notions. To understand what we mean when we pray the liturgy we need to understand Theosis as the means to salvation. That idea is sometimes lost to Latin Catholics who tend to think of salvation as somehow different. Nothing I can say here will do justice to your understanding, but please bear with me, I am not trying to insult here.

The best way I can conceive of it is to describe the Latin process of salvation as a static position once one has died. In other words Latin Catholics tend to think that once one has died, he or she gets a ticket to the theatre of heaven and takes an assigned seat, perhaps with Saint Mary of Nazareth up on stage in front of the curtain.

But we Orthodox know her to be a real person on the same journey as ourselves, and we are asking her to pray for us. She precedes us surely, and her prayers are very efficacious, we are convinced. We have nothing but the highest praise for her. I think that in many ways no one genuinely loves the Theotokos more than your typical Orthodox Christian. She is a heroine to us. We truly respect her and honor her. We see her as further along in this process than we.

So rather than see her up on stage, we see her as front row center, in the seats with us.

Our understanding is that there is an unbridgeable gap between ourselves and the Divine. We may narrow this gap, but never close it. No one can see God, even in death (and thus there is no such thing as a beatific vision). Theosis is an unending process, an eternal quest, a never ending yearning for God and approaching of God. We desire to be God-like, divinized. So in life and in death we are all on this journey of joy that never ends. Saint Mary has all the same limitations as the rest of us in this respect, she is a creature of God in hot pursuit of the Divine.

But we are all on the same narrow path. In that sense we all hope to eventually be right where the Theotokos is right now (and hopefully all of us eventually further along), and perhaps the Holy Theotokos’ prayers (and yours) today will help us achieve that.
 
When I went to St. Luke the Evangelist Orothodox Church’s website,
If that is the one in Palos Hills I know it well. 🙂
…which appears to be connected to the Russian Orthodox Church and read their Liturgy, the Entrance Prayers were quite atonishing to me.

Following are the Entrance Prayers for St. John Chrysostom Liturgy:

Deacon: O blessed Theotokos, open the doors of compassion to us whose hope is in you, that we may not perish but be delivered from adversity through you, who are the salvation of the Christian people.

Then the clergy venerate an icon of the Theotokos:

Deem us worthy of mercy O Theotokos, Fountain of Tenderness. Look on us sinful men and reveal your power as always, for we have put our hope in you.

These words are quite strong and to me it appears that the Orthodox do consider the Blessed Mother much higher than we do.
No, not in the same sense.

I know that much of what the Latin Catholic church holds today originated in the east, many prayers and devotions erupted first in the eats and spread west. Even now there is often a reliance on eastern liturgy to try an understand what the early church believed.

We have to understand this with an Orthodox mindset. It is not wise to transfer eastern hymns of praise and laminate them to Latin preconceived notions. To understand what we mean when we pray the liturgy we need to understand Theosis as the means to salvation. That idea is sometimes lost to Latin Catholics who tend to think of salvation as somehow different. Nothing I can say here will do justice to your understanding, but please bear with me, I am not trying to insult here.

The best way I can conceive of it is to describe the Latin process of salvation as a static position once one has died. In other words Latin Catholics tend to think that once one has died, he or she gets a ticket to the theatre of heaven and takes an assigned seat, perhaps with Saint Mary of Nazareth up on stage in front of the curtain.

But we Orthodox know her to be a real person on the same journey as ourselves, and we are asking her to pray for us. She precedes us surely, and her prayers are very efficacious, we are convinced. We have nothing but the highest praise for her. I think that in many ways no one genuinely loves the Theotokos more than your typical Orthodox Christian. She is a heroine to us. We truly respect her and honor her. We see her as further along in this process than we.

Our understanding of salvation is that there is an unbridgeable gap between ourselves and the Divine. We may narrow this gap, but never close it. No one can see God, even in death (and thus there is no such thing as a beatific vision). Theosis is an unending process, an eternal quest, a never ending yearning for God and approaching of God. We desire to be God-like, divinized. So in life and in death we are all on this journey of joy that never ends. Saint Mary has all the same limitations as the rest of us in this respect, she is a creature of God in hot pursuit of the Divine.

So rather than see her up on stage, we see her as front row center, in the seats with us. She is praying with us as well as for us. We all pray for one another, and we ask for the prayers of the saints, most especially from the Holy Theotokos.

But we are all on the same narrow path (I am mixing my metaphors :p). In that sense we all hope to eventually be right where the Theotokos is right now (and hopefully all of us eventually further along), and perhaps the Holy Theotokos’ prayers (and yours) today will help us achieve that.
 
I understand that the Orthodox would rather refer to many teachings as mysteries of the faith and that the Catholic Church has felt the need to define the mysteries of faith, but I think that in the end there really is no difference whether our Church says Mary was Immaculate from conception on or if the Orthodox choose to just believe that she was Immaculate and not define when.
Hi BernadetteM. I think I could agree with what you are saying, except for one thing: we Catholics are required to be believe the dogma of the I.C., as defined by Pope Pius IX. I don’t see how to reconcile that fact that the idea that “in the end there really is no difference”. (Just imagine an Orthodox Christian approaching a Catholic priest, interested in converting, and being told “Well, our Marian differences don’t really matter; but you can’t become Catholic unless you change what you believe.”)

P.S. Plus, I think you might be a little confused about what the Catholic Church teaches. It’s not just a matter of “when”.
 
If that is the one in Palos Hills I know it well. 🙂
No, not in the same sense.

I know that much of what the Latin Catholic church holds today originated in the east, many prayers and devotions erupted first in the eats and spread west. Even now there is often a reliance on eastern liturgy to try an understand what the early church believed.

We have to understand this with an Orthodox mindset. It is not wise to transfer eastern hymns of praise and laminate them to Latin preconceived notions. To understand what we mean when we pray the liturgy we need to understand Theosis as the means to salvation. That idea is sometimes lost to Latin Catholics who tend to think of salvation as somehow different. Nothing I can say here will do justice to your understanding, but please bear with me, I am not trying to insult here.

The best way I can conceive of it is to describe the Latin process of salvation as a static position once one has died. In other words Latin Catholics tend to think that once one has died, he or she gets a ticket to the theatre of heaven and takes an assigned seat, perhaps with Saint Mary of Nazareth up on stage in front of the curtain.

But we Orthodox know her to be a real person on the same journey as ourselves, and we are asking her to pray for us. She precedes us surely, and her prayers are very efficacious, we are convinced. We have nothing but the highest praise for her. I think that in many ways no one genuinely loves the Theotokos more than your typical Orthodox Christian. She is a heroine to us. We truly respect her and honor her. We see her as further along in this process than we.

Our understanding of salvation is that there is an unbridgeable gap between ourselves and the Divine. We may narrow this gap, but never close it. No one can see God, even in death (and thus there is no such thing as a beatific vision). Theosis is an unending process, an eternal quest, a never ending yearning for God and approaching of God. We desire to be God-like, divinized. So in life and in death we are all on this journey of joy that never ends. Saint Mary has all the same limitations as the rest of us in this respect, she is a creature of God in hot pursuit of the Divine.

So rather than see her up on stage, we see her as front row center, in the seats with us. She is praying with us as well as for us. We all pray for one another, and we ask for the prayers of the saints, most especially from the Holy Theotokos.

But we are all on the same narrow path (I am mixing my metaphors :p). In that sense we all hope to eventually be right where the Theotokos is right now (and hopefully all of us eventually further along), and perhaps the Holy Theotokos’ prayers (and yours) today will help us achieve that.
Just curious are you a convert to the Orthodox Church?

As you said I don’t understand the Orthodox mindset. Maybe I don’t really understand what you were saying in response.

I don’t think that Catholics take an assigned seat and are waiting to be greeted by Mary, if that is what you implied.

From what I understood/misunderstood Orthodox feel that Our Lady is still on her Way to Heaven and we are traveling behind her. At least that was what I gathered from your explanation. Where is the Mother of God now? Yes I believe (just as a Christian) that someday if God so chooses I will be in Heaven praising and worshiping the Holy Trinity and that it is not an never ending journey. I will be Home. Whether we are ever to actually see the Face of the Father I have no idea. As I feel that I have a simple faith from your post I find Catholicism a much simpler faith to understand. Not because the Church has clear statements what the Church teaches, but because as I read scripture it seems clearly to be in alignment of the Catholic Church. There will always be many many difficult mysteries that no one will ever understand, but since our Lord knows His children so well He knew that to believe there must be clear teachings and I must be honest, not to judge, but I find Orthodoxy very much more complicated and difficult to understand.

As I am sure you are aware by now I am not a theologian of any kind, nor am I ignorant or stupid. We have had many great minds in the Church, past present and future. The Holy Spirit has led me to the Catholic Church and the Blessed Mother has played a hugh role in my families life. Of course Catholics understand that she is only human, but in her humanity God has blessed her above all creatures. When I read your liturgy I understand it maybe from a different mindset, but words convey meanings and as I stated in my post I still feel that the Orthodox accept what we accept, maybe using a different terminology, but the belief is still there.

Let us all be humble towards one another as when our Blessed Lord calls us to His Domain we shall all be together worshiping the same God, Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

Pardon me if I misinterpeted what you have posted. It seems it is well above my understanding of the Faith that you hold so dear to your heart. If the two lungs of the Church are to ever be One, it will be joined not by men, but by our Holy God and the Holy Spirit.

May God Bless you.

Yours in the Hearts of Jesus and Mary

Bernadette
 
As you said I don’t understand the Orthodox mindset. Maybe I don’t really understand what you were saying in response.

I don’t think that Catholics take an assigned seat and are waiting to be greeted by Mary, if that is what you implied.
I guess I didn’t explain this very well.

I did not mean to imply that Latin Catholics think Mary “greets” you in heaven. What I meant was that there is a sense that once one dies the position of each is fixed, and saint Mary has somehow been placed above us.

Theosis is an ongoing process. We strive to to become God-like but can never be God or encompass God in our minds. He is beyond our understanding, God is unfathomable. We yearn for God, we approach, in this life and the next. It is a never-ending process because God is infinitely greater in infinite ways.

Saint Mary of Nazareth, creature of God, is on this same journey with us. She may be out in front but it is a journey for her too, even now. She is not in a special place above us so much as further along in this process. Orthodox hymns of praise must be understood in this context.

Saint Mary of Nazareth is the Holy Theotokos, the God-bearer. She has shown us what can be, she has inspired us. We creatures also can say yes to God. The life of saint Mary of Nazareth is a template for the rest of us.

We ask for her prayers like we ask for each other’s prayers, but we do love the Mother of God and expect that her prayers are very efficacious. The Theotokos and Saint John the Forerunner are probably the holiest people in heaven, so naturally we ask of them for help more often than of any other saints.

Michael
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top