J
JohnVIII
Guest
There’s something in what you said that hits home for me.That’s definitely one of the biggest reasons I joined the Catholic communion - understanding by the grace of the Holy Spirit that the differences were not big enough to be in schism from the bishop of Rome. In my studies, I took to heart the examples of Pope St. Victor and St. Irenaeus, and Popes St. Cyril and St. Athanasius, and St. Maximus the Confessor.
I came into this whole Catholic and/or Orthodox picture from far left field - I originally was a Mormon; I even served a mission for the Mormon Church for 2 years in Idaho. One day I learned that Mormonism was not the “true church” it claimed to be. I tried to educate myself about the historical churches (Coptic, Orthodox, Armenian) to see if I could believe in a “true church” again and not be deceived. The reason I went in the Orthodox direction is because, to me, it seemed more universal. A group of churches, self-governing since the time of the apostles, and yet because they have not changed from the same faith that they held from apostolic times until today they remain in communion with each other. Later on I learned that many of the traditional Orthodox actually broke communion with most of the national churches. I tried to be a traditionalist for many years because I wanted the “pure” version of Orthodoxy. But, the end result of all this ended me up in very, very small jurisdiction that was in communion with nobody! I realized that by trying to be “pure” I lost the universality which was the reason I choose Orthodoxy in the first place. So I left that very, very small jurisdiction and joined the Antiochian Orthodox; which is of course in communion with most all of the canonical Orthodox jurisdictions.
In a way it would be like taking one more step in the direction of a more universal catholic communion if there were some way to remain Orthodox and yet attain to communion with Rome, since Rome seems to have a pretty solid claim to be the Chair of St. Peter, somehow Orthodoxy cannot be totally complete without the communion of St. Peter.
The problem for me, of course, is that I would have to brake communion with most of the canonical Orthodox Churches again, just as I once before did, in order to unite with Rome. The only difference is that instead of braking communion to be in a very, very small jurisdiction I would be braking communion to be in a very, very large jurisdiction (Rome). It seems like it should be “all for one and one for all”, but that choice is not available.
You say “ … the differences were not big enough to be in schism from the bishop of Rome”. I also ask “are the differences big enough to be in schism from the 15 canonical Orthodox Churches”? Becoming an Eastern Catholic comes close to this ideal, but close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades. :crutches: