M
mdgspencer
Guest
For what the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople said, see
www.ewtn.com/vnews/getstory.asp?number=109741
www.ewtn.com/vnews/getstory.asp?number=109741
I’m pretty sure those monks in question were forcibly expelled.Good thing the patriarch is more sensible than the monks of a certain monastery on Mt Athos. (now considered in schism from Orthodoxy)
Yes, they were.I’m pretty sure those monks in question were forcibly expelled.
This is getting tiresome.This is going to be a very long road…
Personally, I believe Holy Mother Church should abide by Our Lady of Fatma’s biding, and consecrate Russia to her Immaculate Heart. …
What kind of union are you envisioning?a lot of words of wisdom from the Patriarch pointing out to idle talking and so forth. but I still dont see the Patriarch point out to any solution for the union …
Well, I don’t know for sure but if I had to guess I would think he means Orthodoxy.… and what Truth is he talking about.
I also did not like his enterpretation of the Church. it is kind of confusing.
Confusing to whom?I also did not like his enterpretation of the Church. it is kind of confusing.
He enterpretation sounds more like protestant enterpretation of the Church.Confusing to whom?
The same since the beginning. from the time of the Epistles, there was no separation of the Church. this union can only be under the pope. If not, then you all going to remain just like protestant congregations, free churches.What kind of union are you envisioning?
Well, I don’t know for sure but if I had to guess I would think he means Orthodoxy.
Yes, I know this belief is controversial, and, yes, I agree it is “tiresome” - for both of us, I suppose ; nonetheless, the controversy has to do with the specific request to i) consecrate Russia (explicitly) to the Immaculate Heart of Mary by ii) all the Catholic Bishops throughout the whole world (not the Pope singularly consecrating Russia or, contrawise, all the Catholic Bishops throughout the whole world consecrating the entire world to her Immaculate Heart, which only implicitly includes Russia).This is getting tiresome.
How many years will it take for most Catholics to acknowledge that their Pope already did this? The issue comes up a lot up there in the Traditional Catholic section of CAF, but rarely here in the basement.
Apparently it’s not so confusing that you can’t label it. Either way, the Protestants are your children. Our Church polity has been the same long before the the Schism and long before your progeny the Protestants came on the scene.He enterpretation sounds more like protestant enterpretation of the Church.
The bible refers to the “Church of Christ”, a term used long before the term “Catholic”, by your logic, the protestant denomination known as “The Church of Christ” is the one true church.The same since the beginning. from the time of the Epistles, there was no separation of the Church. this union can only be under the pope. If not, then you all going to remain just like protestant congregations, free churches.
the Church has been called the Catholic Church and not Orthodox church. how many times do you have to hear this to understand that the title of the church cannot change. Like St Augustine said: “when our enemies get together, they will refer to us as those Catholics over there.”
:yup:Either way, the Protestants are your children.
:sad_yes:As long as Catholics insist on pushing ultramontane views on us there can be no union.
Apparently it’s not so confusing that you can’t label it. Either way, the Protestants are your children. Our Church polity has been the same long before the the Schism and long before your progeny the Protestants came on the scene.![]()
Didn’t know this was the Basement, Hesychios, but Ok…This is getting tiresome.
How many years will it take for most Catholics to acknowledge that their Pope already did this? The issue comes up a lot up there in the Traditional Catholic section of CAF, but rarely here in the basement.