C
ChickenFingers
Guest
I still am praying about coming back though. It honestly changes based on the week about which way I’m leaning. It is a paralysis of over analysis.
Me too. To swim the Tiber the first time is a bit daunting, especially knowing my fickle heart and wandering will.I still am praying about coming back though. It honestly changes based on the week about which way I’m leaning. It is a paralysis of over analysis.
I can not agree with this more. I think the “Spirit” of Vatican II is abused heavily. Some people really act like old Church ended and new Church came. I really like fact we can have liturgies in vernacular… I also like that OF allows for Communion in both kinds (even though in my country, it is not allowed and probably won’t be anytime soon… Priest is still allowed to allow us to receive Precious Blood if we are either altar-serving or Mass is attended by very small amount of people). I like many things Vatican II (re-)introduced, but in the end abuses that came out of it were something not from the Council itself. I pray for a Pope that can and will fix those abuses because I am under impression that people desperately need it.Yes I agree, Vatican II was not totally wrong, it just seems that the interpretation has been wrong in most cases. Some of the changes seem proper, especially communion in both kinds, and the option for Liturgy in the Vernacular.
I will pray that we find where Christ’s Church is. May He lead us where we belongChickenFingers:
Me too. To swim the Tiber the first time is a bit daunting, especially knowing my fickle heart and wandering will.I still am praying about coming back though. It honestly changes based on the week about which way I’m leaning. It is a paralysis of over analysis.
That makes perfect sense to me. Well, my Confirmation Patron Saint is St. John the Apostle so I am a a bit biased to agree when you say he would be “perfect” PopeIn my non-infallible opinion, if Our Lord wanted a “perfect” pope, then He could have chosen St. John who was the only Apostle at the foot of the cross (as far as we know from Holy Scripture). The fact that He chose St. Peter corresponds in a way to what St. Paul would later write of himself to the Corinthians (2 Cor. 12: 9): “…Gladly therefore will I glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may dwell in me.” He chose St. Peter in order that His power would be manifested in him.
I came in under an ex-Evangelical Priest - No small matter for an atheist sinner! I came to terms with it when a cradle-O was complaining about him, and I came to his defense, saying “He is, after all, a recovering Evangelical! My sins come off slow too!” So the Priest got wind of me calling him a recovering Evangelical… And yes, I braced for the rebuke, I will admit it! But instead he began describing himself as a recovering Evangelical when talking to others… Orthodoxy does that, you see… Even to old hard-liners! It just grinds down hard edges and softens the soul…My other problem I found with Orthodoxy was with the other converts from low-church Protestantism. They seemed to carry with them a specific flavor of calvinist/baptist disdain for Catholicism.
I love this comment. There are two ways to look at Vatican II. We can use a hermeneutic of discontinuity, where we view the developments as a break with the past, or with a hermeneutic of continuity, where we view the developments as authentic and compatible with the past. Both views have been espoused, but I would argue that the hermeneutic of continuity is the correct way to look at Vatican II. It was such a beautiful council with a rich theology. The problem is that many of the documents use language that could be considered vague and broad. This vagueness leads to misunderstandings or “loopholes” that people abuse. If we look at the council in light of Church tradition, then I think the picture becomes clearer. Probably entirely irrelevant to this nearly month old post, but your comment resulted in that spark, so I had to shareI think the “Spirit” of Vatican II is abused heavily. Some people really act like old Church ended and new Church came.
As a former Byzantine Catholic, I’ve always felt that the Melkites are leading the way for communion between both Churches.I was actually talking to some of my Melkite friends, and they call themselves Orthodox
There are many reasons. Mainly, because Rome has changed so much. It don’t see that it resembles the ancient church at all. But also, as I dove deeper into learning about the East, the more I fell in love with her theology, spirituality and liturgical life. I wasn’t going to be one of those Roman Catholics who attended a Byzantine Catholic Church because it had a more “reverent Mass,” so I went “native.” I came to a crossroads. I could either live fully, as best as I could, as an Eastern Catholic in communion with Rome or become Orthodox. As a Byzantine Catholic I celebrated St Gregory Palamas’ feast day on the second Sunday of Great Lent, St Photios is venerated in the Melkite Greek Catholic Church:Why did you convert to Orthodoxy?
I don’t. Although, I do have a great fondness for the Catholic Church. It’s where I received the sacraments 3/4 of my life. I believe that both Churches are “the Church.” We unfortunately are not in full communion.Ever think about going back to Catholicism?