OT forshadowing of Protestantism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DustinsDad
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Dear Scalia,

Please see my post #19 for a response.

Thanks,
reen12

PS: same can be applied to the Fathers of the Church.
Logical reasoning applied to assertions.
 
40.png
chb03c:
If you notice how the Protestants seem to be becoming more part of the “world” or becoming more “worldly” then the Catholic church is.
Catholicism may be less “worldly” than Protestants. You would have a tougher time convincing me that (on average) Catholics themselves are less “worldly”.
 
40.png
reen12:
Hi, thessalonian,

quote: thessalonian

I offer you your own quote:

"…since you assume that Rom is not the barque of Peter…
quote, thessalonian

Where, in my post, did I *state *that I do not believe
that. Again, an assumption.

I happens to be true, but it is neither stated nor
implied in my post. [the square of opposition].
I pointed to what you assume to be true.

And, for the record, all faith statements are
assertions, in the logical realm. Mine, yours,
Luther’s…

Best,
reen12
godrules.net/library/luther/luther.htm
Reen12, Thess was attempting to facilitate the discussion by cutting to the chase regarding your assumptions. While you agree that Thess’ “assumption…happens to be true” you disingenuously take issue with it. You are simply playing games.

“all faith statements are assertions” Even those faith staments issued by Christ? Isn’t your general premise, itself, an “assertion” ?
 
Dear thessalonian,

You’re right. I’ve heard all these Catholic
arguments for 55 years. :sleep:

reen12:D
 
Dear Scalia,

Thank you for reminding me.

Jesus made assertions, i.e. truth claims.
I accept those claims as true.
This is called faith.

Best,
reen12
 
Dear thessalonian,

quote: thessalonian
Protestant Hymn:

In that great wakin’ up mornin’
Fare thee well, Fare thee well ! 😃

Best,
reen12
 
40.png
reen12:
Hi, DustinsDad,

Thanks for your reply.

quote: DustinsDad

If you’ll be patient, I’d like to offer what truly happened
to Luther, both from my reading of his work * plus
a number of additional sources on him.

Luther was tormented by scrupulosity, which is
considered a form of obsessive-compulsive
disorder in 2005.

While he could be amazingly coarse in speech, he was
also in some ways a sensitive human being.
Between his spiritual torment [which was actually
a psychological disorder expressing itself in
a religious context] and his outrage over the sale
of indulgences…he blew a gasket!

The only way that he could “solve” his troubles
was to come to an understanding that the
emphasis* was on what Jesus “did”, not what
he, Martin, “did” [works].

Once he got rolling, there was no stopping him.

Having read enough about scrupulosity, and
read what others experience in this realm, I
know that deep anger can be generated toward
what is seen as the “source” of this torment -
the thought of eternal loss based on our “works.”

You see, a scrupulous person can feel that
much of what they do or think is a sin.
Luther’s relief came when he understood that
it is faith in Jesus that both justifies *and *saves,
not “works.” [You’d might be surprised to see
what Luther actually wrote on “works.”]

From this brief overview, perhaps those caricatures
of Luther that abound, can be seen as a misreading
of what was the experience of a troubled soul.

I’m not defending what he did. I try to understand
why he did what he did.

You know why I took the trouble to read what
Luther *actually *wrote and thought?

Because I have “been there, done that.”
The man saved my sanity.
Blessed Assurance.

Be well, DustinsDad,

reen12

I think this type of reasoning goes both ways. As an ex-protestant over time as I myself studied and mediatated on scripture became tormented by certain things in scripture that did not make sense. I was taught that I was at Luther so eloquently put it “a* dunghill covered with snow”* and to quote Luther again, “so sin boldly!”

Without scripture slinging here and leaving this more general, I could not reconcile the Protestant idea of once saved always saved with scripture and the historical church and *this caused me deep grief and sent me on a five year journey to discover the truth of early Christianity. *What I found in studying scripture and light of the Church Fathers and Sacred Tradition was peace in knowing that what my heart and mind were telling me were true, mainly that there is no such thing as cheap grace in the historical church of the first, second, third century and so on…

We are called to presevere daily, examine our hearts and conscience often, confess our wrongs ( not secretly) and as Paul aludes to “beat our bodies daily” not literally, but to gain mastery over the flesh in prayer, fasting, being immersed in the Sacraments, and being chritable to name a few. We in essence partner with God, we must take hold of the works he has prepared for us. Yes, living for God is hard, it takes response and daily repentance. But we must always be anchored in hope, in Gods mercy and forgiveness, in His Redemption. Cheap grace is a lie and dupes into believeing we have arrived and that Christ owes us something in this life. Did he not assure us that we would suffer?

Did not Paul state that he "fills up in his flesh" what is lacking in the afflictions of Christ for the sake of His body the Church? This Does not sound like someone who had arrived correct? As a Protestant I was tormented by ‘secret sin’ that had mastery over me. Yet I’d wake up and trick my mind that it wasn’t important because Jesus nailed it to the cross. And year aftre year I would hide in secret sin and play mental gymnastics to get around it. Confession is not easy. It is hard and humbling. Yet it has sacramental grace and power to heal. Exposing sin to the light iin confession s one of the greatest gifts God has given me. If you want the true power of God deal with sin radically and not half heartedly or in secret.

So ya see, torment works both ways. Luther was a nut and went over board. He created his own bible, his own church, threw out books that didn’t appeal to him, was a hypocrite who could not practice what he preached (Sola-Scriptura and Faith Alone) persecuted other bible alone advocates who disssented from him, what a mess!

So you don’t need to sell us Luther, been there and done that!
Code:
                   Blessings in Christ   Michael
 
Dear Michael Howard,

Thank you for your thoughts and relating your
own experience. From your account, I can well
understand how the sacraments assist you
spiritually.

For me, I thank Luther profoundly.

For a broken human being like me, it’s not a matter
of “cheap grace,” but rather Amazing Grace.
[In terms of suffering, you might consult the
thread on Mental Illness and Spirituality on
the Spirituality Forum. My posts there will
testify to brokeness.]

I like the Snoopy cartoon, where Snoopy is
dancing joyfully, while Lucy stands in
the background calling: despair, decay,
ruination…and Snoopy goes on dancing.

Let others ruminate on “foreshadowing” in
the book of Numbers…

I join in the dance with Snoopy and my Savior.

Kindest regards,
reen12
 
Hello reen,

If I come across as abrasive I apologize, I just am. What shines through most about you is your spirit of kindness, thank you. I am both happy and sad for you reen. Happy that you have broken through what you consider to be ‘Spiritual Mental Illness’… This can be a problem for Catholic and Protestant alike. Religion without the Holy Spirit, without knowing Jesus intimately and personally can be quite destructive indeed. I wonder how many religious wars we would have if folks knew Christ intimately?

I am sad for you that you have gone the easy road. I will give you the benefit of the doubt though that perhaps God needs to heal you and take you back around to His church. Are you open to that possibility if He should lead you back that way?
From your account, I can well
understand how the sacraments assist you
spiritually.
I must clarify that it’s Jesus who assists me for he is the head of the Sacraments. He instituted them and presides over everyone. The Eucharist being the true Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of Christ,* how much more intimate can one get?* Yet they are not simply for me, they are your heritage as well reen. By turning away from them you lose so much. I cannot even begin tom describe how it must break the heart of Jesus. God met me where I was as a Protestant and I was grateful. But I kept climbing the ladder of truth and was unwillng to go with what was easy. Yes Gods grace is Amazing, He is so willing to forgive friend. In the diary of Sister Faustina Jesus revealed the depths of His mercy, it’s mindblowing! Christ told Faustina that at the time of death He calls to every soul, extends His mercy because he is just. Many will reject His mercy and be damned, he honors those wishes.

But scripture is clear there is a price for following Jesus, our lives! you and I would agree correct? The book of Hebrews warns Christians not to turn back to ’ weak and miserable principles’, not to shrink away, not to forsake meeting together. It speaks of the difference between land that drinks rain and dry land that is over run with thorns and thistles, in danger of being burned. These warnings run ALL through Sacred Scripture.

When I say cheap grace, I am not mocking the amazing power of Gods grace. But don’t fall into the trap that Catholics have not experienced the exilerating grace and freedom you yourself have experienced, some like myself have been *re-born *in the catholic church. Yet my liberation comes from being fully convinced in my mind of the truths of the Catholic Church. I am no longer an alien in my mind ya see. Yes, it is harder, it takes more discipline and self sacrifice, but, I am not a dung heap covered in snow, God values me more than that. He incorperates me into His work and gives me a mission. With that I have a responsibility to keep myself washed and clean, I must wash in His grace, I must put on His grace amen?

Listen, if a king called you to live in a royal palace, if he bestowed on you all the gifts of his kingdom would that negate your responsibility to take a bath and keep yourself clean? The king will not force you to stay clean right? But if you stink to bad you may find yourself out of the palace correct? Consider the parable of the wedding feast. Jesus told those invited to dress appropriatley for the wedding, yet one showed up in filthy clothes and thought he would get right in, what happened? He got tossed out into darkness! What about the grace to do whatever we want? Where is the line reen? Where does Jesus say “enough?”

You have to admit that many Protestants, (I said many not all) come to know Jesus by an act called ‘Praying Jesus into your heart’. This is for the most part an emotional experience. I too experinced this and God can use this because He is mercy. To many this becomes a ticket to heaven, a done deal correct? It is an emotional appeal that can never be undone. But in hindsight I have come to see this as incorrect. God calls us to use all of our mental facilties of reason and logic, to deduct truth from error, to dig into history and examine the heritage left to us to safegaurd us from error. Never in the history of the early church do you see this sort of thing. It does not exist in scripture or tradition. When I say cheap grace I point to things like this. So be careful when you paint one picture of spiritual liberation. Am I liberated because I do not have to think about hell and sin anymore, or am I liberated because I am fully at peace in my heart and mind that the road I am walking is the path Jesus layed out?

God bless you! Michael
 
Reen,

Thanks pointing me to the article. I’m reading it and re-reading it…Trying to get a grasp on Luther’s theology of grace, and how it relates to his problems with scrupulosity. I see in it hints of what is called now in Calvinist circles as “Total Depravity” and the basis of the words Luther would use to describe the regenerate man - “a snow covered pile of dung” (or something like that).

I find it interesting, also, his take on how we should approach God - that seeking His gifts rather than Him is a big problem… I guess I’d say we seek Him and humbly ask for His temporal blessings as well - we all approach Him as beggars after all. As long as we keep our eyes on the Eternal Life with Him as the ultimate gift, and humbly accept His “No” to temporal blessings when that is His answer, I think we should be okay 😉 .

Finally, I must say that the article does seem to back up what I had said earlier:
40.png
DustinsDad:
Anyway, since Luther didn’t get his way on certain theological issues (he didn’t start off attempting to overthrow Church authority - he started off in other areas), he had to justify his subsequent rebellion from the Church - this meant he had to find some way to deny the authority of the Church, hence the introduction of Sola Scriptura.
With the following paragraphs from the article, it seems to go from presenting some of the earlier theological teachings that were in question and being examined by the Church (which made no reference to sola Scriptura), to them being eventually rejected, to Luther then deciding that the pope was the antiChrist.
This reading of Luther’s development suggests that the Western schism, far from being the appropriate historical outcome of principled theological disagreement, was instead a tragic chapter of accidents. There are no historical grounds for believing that the schism was the necessary outcome of Luther’s theology of grace. On the contrary, on the one occasion when Luther’s theological proposals received a halfway careful hearing from a representative of the Roman Church, at his meetings with Cardinal Cajetan in Augsburg in 1518, the conclusion reached was that his doctrine of justifying faith was not obviously heretical or in clear opposition to the tradition of the Church. While Cajetan only understood Luther’s views imperfectly, and regarded them as temerarious and mistaken, he was ready to recommend that they receive further discussion and consideration before a final judgment was reached.

Schism was the contingent outcome of the badly managed causa Lutheri, the ecclesiastical examination of Luther’s orthodoxy in 1518-1519, and the controversy over teaching authority with which it became entangled. On Luther’s side, the final break with the Church authorities came in the wake of Leo X’s bull of November 1518; in that document, as Luther saw it, Leo arrogated to himself the power of defining Church teaching without accountability to Scripture, the Fathers, or the ancient canons. This led Luther eventually to conclude that the Roman Church was irrevocably committed to the claim that the authority of the pope stood even above Holy Scripture and it was in this context that he came, over the next several years, to believe that the papacy was the prophesied Antichrist of the last days, a conviction he then held to his dying day with a literalistic fervor that his modern interpreters have rarely been willing to take as seriously as he did.
(The Catholic Luther
, by David S. Yeago)

Seems, as I indicated earlier, that until his theological ideas came under fire, that Luther had no problem with the doctrinal authority of the Church.

Peace in Christ,

DustinsDad
40.png
reen12:
I’m looking for an online site to recommend, but
in the meantime, you might want to invest some
time in the following article:
firstthings.com/ftissues/ft9603/articles/yeago.html
 
Hi, DustinsDad,

I’m glad you took a look at that article. And it
sure does take more than one reading!

Could we say that Luther, in reality, was
challenging practices of the Church, pointing
to Scripture and saying: You have bent
and distorted the clear meaning of Scripture,
and from now on I will rely on God’s Word
for guidance…which came to be called Sola
Scriptura?
He may have been in error, but, still, I have
enormous empathy with the man.
BTW, my understanding of the snow-covered
dungheap is:
In his time, farmer’s kept such material for
fertilizer. The sight of a snow covered dungheap
would have been very familiar to his congregation.
I think his idea was that Christ covers our sins
like snow etc.
Whereas the Catholic Church sees us wounded
in nature, not totally depraved…which I’m glad
to hear!
Kindest regards,
reen12
 
40.png
reen12:
Could we say that Luther, in reality, was
challenging practices of the Church, pointing
to Scripture and saying: You have bent
and distorted the clear meaning of Scripture,
and from now on I will rely on God’s Word
for guidance…which came to be called Sola
Scriptura?
Couple a things…

*If he’d only have been challenging bad practices, his teachings wouldn’t been condemned as heretical in **1620. **

*The second he went from recognizing Church authority to rejecting it and relying instead on Scripture alone, i.e. his own personal interpretation of Scripture, he left practice and moved into the realm of theology - the authority of the church itself is a part of Apostolic Teaching.

*Luther’s pattern - accepting church authority, introducing new teachings that were subsequently condemned by church authority, rejecting church authority - follows the path all heresies that have ever come down the pike. So if we say these words to describe Luther’s “rebellion”, we could pretty well use 'em to describe all the others - there’s not many heresies that don’t claim Scripture supports them.
He may have been in error, but, still, I have
enormous empathy with the man.
Understood. We should always have empathy with our fellow man - but not necessarily with our fellow man’s teaching. 😉
BTW, my understanding of the snow-covered
dungheap is:
In his time, farmer’s kept such material for
fertilizer. The sight of a snow covered dungheap
would have been very familiar to his congregation.
I think his idea was that Christ covers our sins
like snow etc.
Yes, but the question is…are we the dung itself or is sin the dung Christ wants to wash off of us. Does he want to declare us clean, wash us clean, or both???
Whereas the Catholic Church sees us wounded
in nature, not totally depraved…which I’m glad
to hear!
Me too!

Peace in Christ,

DustinsDad
 
Hi, DustinsDad,

quote: **DustinsDad **
Understood. We should always have empathy with our fellow man - but not necessarily with our fellow man’s teaching. 😉
Ya got me! 🙂

quote:DustinsDad
Yes, but the question is…are we the dung itself or is sin the dung Christ wants to wash off of us. Does he want to declare us clean, wash us clean, or both???
No disagreement here. I was describing Luther’s
concept, not endorsing it, in this case, at least.

You know, I find myself becoming a Syncretist.
I suppose the Church would call it an heretical
position.

I don’t defend my position *, I just
describe it.🙂

All best regards,
reen12*
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top