Our Lady and the EUCHARIST

  • Thread starter Thread starter mymamamary
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

mymamamary

Guest
**Dear Brothers and Sisters in CHRIST!!

I wanted to share a gem of our Faith.

I was reflecting on the Most HOLY EUCHARIST. I was reflecting that this is actually JESUS CHRIST, HIS BODY, BLOOD, SOUL AND DIVINITY. I wanted to share, that although this may be a no brainer to some of you:

That Body that HE shares with you every sunday, is the Same body that He took from Our Lady.

Just sayin’ so that next time You pull that Rosary out, please throw in a couple extra Ave’s in MUCHO thanksgiving for what Our Lady did for us. Its so beautiful to think that the SAME JESUS I eat every sunday, is literally the Same JESUS who resided inside the Immaculate Womb of Our Lady.

Phew! If that is not beautiful, then nothing is…**
 
that is very nice

it is so awsome we are given eternal bread
 
**Ave Maria!!

Hail Momma. Hail To You whom was the given the privilege of no other being in existence. To be the First Tabernacle. Hail to Thee, Co-redemptrix and Queen of Martyrs. Hail Momma. You saw the pallor of Death come upon Your SON and watched as He was ripped away from You, Your Only Son, destroyed in the flower of His Youth. I will never be able to thank You fully enough in this lifetime, Momma. I can only gawk in silence for the unbelievable Work that was accomplished through You.

Love You Momma, Now and Forever!! Cover Us under Your mantle and hide us as your little children, from the snares of satan.**
 
Surely the Body we receive is His risen, Glorified Body, the one that can be in millions of places at once. The Body He developed in the womb of Mary was subject to pain, weariness and hunger. His glorious Body is subject to none of those things - after the Resurrection it even passed through closed doors.

i’m not sure I agree with you, mymamamary. Can you find anything in the catechism about it?
 
I have to agree with what paperwight says also.

It’s a beautiful sentiment MMM, but I am not sure I understand what you are trying to say. It seems as though you are elevating Mary to a position higher than that of Jesus.
paperwight66 said:
Surely the Body we receive is His risen, Glorified Body, the one that can be in millions of places at once. The Body He developed in the womb of Mary was subject to pain, weariness and hunger. His glorious Body is subject to none of those things - after the Resurrection it even passed through closed doors.

i’m not sure I agree with you, mymamamary. Can you find anything in the catechism about it?
Click to expand...
 
When I tried to share this here, people accused me of making new doctrine or making a goddess out of Mary, though it is a logical consequence of Jesus being the son of Mary and having no fleshly father.

If you want to take it further, when we partake of the Eucharist covenantal blood in what we are partaking of. Really puts a new way of seeing how the Church is the New Israel and spiritual children of Abraham (the blood is the life according to the bible). Jesus was a Jew and He remained human even after His Resurrection.
 
The Blessed Virgin is truly the Mother of God as the 431 First Council of Ephesus declares, and as the way She received Christ in Her womb at the Annunciation resembles receiving the Holy Eucharist, Her canticle Magnificat has been recommended as a Post Communion prayer. Additional notable prayers for the purpose include the Anima Christi and En ego, o bone et dulcissime Iesu which carry a partial indulgence thereupon. The Magnificat carries such an indulgence in itself when recited piously.

Enchiridion Indulgentiarum, 4th edition, 1999 (Latin):
§ 2. Partialis indulgentia conceditur christifideli qui, qualibet pia formula legitime adprobata, elicuerit:
Click to expand...
1°17 spiritalis communionis actum,
Click to expand...
2° gratiarum actionem post communionem (e.g. Anima Christi; En ego, o bone et dulcissime Iesu).
Click to expand...
§ 2. Partialis indulgentia conceditur christifideli qui
Click to expand...
1°30 canticum Magnificat pie recitaverit;
Click to expand...
 
**Our LORD took His Physical body from Our Lady. HE developed inside of Her womb and thus more likely than not had physical attributes that were Our Ladys (E.g. Eyes, Face, Skin color, DNA etc). So if the EUCHARIST is really HIS BODY, BLOOD SOUL AND DIVINITY, which of course it is, The Body came from Our Lady. JESUS Chose to come to this world through Her, which meant looking like HIS Mother. I’m not trying to elevate Our Lady higher than Our LORD, I’m just saying that Our LORD took HIS Humanity from HIS Momma. She isn’t a goddess, but being human, and Our LORD being Fully GOD and Fully Man, Our LORDS Physical attributes were probably and mostly inherited from HIS Mother. **
 
paperwight66 said:
Surely the Body we receive is His risen, Glorified Body, the one that can be in millions of places at once. The Body He developed in the womb of Mary was subject to pain, weariness and hunger. His glorious Body is subject to none of those things - after the Resurrection it even passed through closed doors.

i’m not sure I agree with you, mymamamary. Can you find anything in the catechism about it?
Click to expand...
Of course we recieve HIS Glorified Body (Hence the reason we aren’t cannibals) however, that body was still physically the same after HIS Ressurection. Same Hair, Same DNA, Same skin color etc., and these physical attributes were from Our Lady as She was the only Human to ever pass anything onto Our LORD (Hereditary features) as Our LORD had no earthly father.
 
OK, and your point?!

Don’t misunderstand, Mary is important, but I am just not sure that I understand what it is you are trying to say.

And from a biological point of view- if Jesus only got DNA from Mary, he would have been a “she”. The ‘y’ chromosome is only carried by the male.
 
I am rediscovering the Catholic faith and last Saturday, i went to a special room in my church where they place the tabernacle. Oh good grace, did i feel this love and his warm presence. I cannot receive the Eucharist as i used to (completely numb and indifferent), i feel like a child now and just in awe with this great miracle.

Thank you for sharing!

Love and blessings!
 
Oneofthewomen said:
OK, and your point?!

Don’t misunderstand, Mary is important, but I am just not sure that I understand what it is you are trying to say.

And from a biological point of view- if Jesus only got DNA from Mary, he would have been a “she”. The ‘y’ chromosome is only carried by the male.
Click to expand...
Our LORD took HIS Body from Our Lady. Thats my point.

Ave Verum Corpus Natum Natum De Maria Virgine

The last line of "Ave Verum CORPUS is :

O Jesu, Fili Mariae, Miserere mei. Amen.

Im not being heretical, Im just expressing that We can thank Our Lady for Her “Fiat” because without this Fiat, no EUCHARIST. Its not just a pious thought, its Truth. I am very doubtful that Our LORD didn’t take any physical traits from Our Lady. However, my intended point is we have to thank Our Lady for Her “Fiat” at the Incarnation. If we are devoted to Our Lady within the guidelines of the Church, then we can never go too far.
 
Glory does not destroy nature, but rather perfects it 😉

In heaven Jesus is as ever much the Son of Mary, and Mary the Mother of Jesus. 👍
 
paperwight66 said:
Surely the Body we receive is His risen, Glorified Body, the one that can be in millions of places at once. The Body He developed in the womb of Mary was subject to pain, weariness and hunger. His glorious Body is subject to none of those things - after the Resurrection it even passed through closed doors.

i’m not sure I agree with you, mymamamary. Can you find anything in the catechism about it?
Click to expand...
And which Body was it before He was glorified when He changed bread and wine into His Body and Blood at the Last Supper? Just trying to be a trouble maker. 😃 Actually, how could it be His infant body or his 33 year old body, since they are his historical bodies, and they no longer exist. Yet we say it is the same sacrifice as on Calvary except in an unbloody manner. Also, at the Transfiguration He revealed Himself in a glorified state. So, I’ll vote with you in saying it is Him in a glorified (but not spiritual) state, and able to transcend the limits of time and space. I don’t really know what I’m talking about. All I know is that it’s Him really present. 🙂
 
Glacies said:
The Blessed Virgin is truly the Mother of God as the 431 First Council of Ephesus declares, and as the way She received Christ in Her womb at the Annunciation resembles receiving the Holy Eucharist, Her canticle Magnificat has been recommended as a Post Communion prayer. Additional notable prayers for the purpose include the Anima Christi and En ego, o bone et dulcissime Iesu which carry a partial indulgence thereupon. The Magnificat carries such an indulgence in itself when recited piously.

Enchiridion Indulgentiarum, 4th edition, 1999 (Latin):
Click to expand...
The magnificat is my post communion prayer.

If Mary lives in our hearts, I mean really, we will have no trouble attracting Jesus to live there as well. He will always go where His mother is. The magnificat is her prayer, and in part, our prayer. Where we say, “He looks on His servant in her lowliness; Henceforth all ages will call me blessed,” I can think only of her, but I can appropriate the rest of the prayer before and after for myself, because it is universal.
 
mymamamary said:
**Our LORD took His Physical body from Our Lady. HE developed inside of Her womb and thus more likely than not had physical attributes that were Our Ladys (E.g. Eyes, Face, Skin color, DNA etc). So if the EUCHARIST is really HIS BODY, BLOOD SOUL AND DIVINITY, which of course it is, The Body came from Our Lady. JESUS Chose to come to this world through Her, which meant looking like HIS Mother. I’m not trying to elevate Our Lady higher than Our LORD, I’m just saying that Our LORD took HIS Humanity from HIS Momma. She isn’t a goddess, but being human, and Our LORD being Fully GOD and Fully Man, Our LORDS Physical attributes were probably and mostly inherited from HIS Mother. **
Click to expand...
I’ve heard it said that Mary is the perfect reflection of Jesus, and conversely, Jesus is the perfect reflection of His Mother. I mean, stop and think about it, neither of them had original sin and neither of them sinned. Mary, full of grace, spouse of the Holy Spirit, as Jesus’ Mother instructed Him as a child. I’m sure for the most part His Divinity was hidden, and He grew up as a normal boy, but one filled with the Holy Spirit.
 
The same thing has occurred to me mymammamary. I think you are on to something!
 
We can thank Mary or not. Thing is, we don’t really have to. She was just (and I express this with the fullest of love and devotion) doing her job, like John the Baptist did his job.
 
Yehuda_Dion said:
We can thank Mary or not. Thing is, we don’t really have to. She was just (and I express this with the fullest of love and devotion) doing her job, like John the Baptist did his job.
Click to expand...
Except that Her Job was to be the first tabernacle of GOD, WHOM heaven and Earth could not contain, She had to be HIS caretaker and Mother, literally, then She had to stand by and watch Her SON die in the flower of HIS YOUTH. Our Lady is pretty important. The role she played in Salvation history is second only to Our LORDS Sacrifice on the Cross.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top