O
ORD_Man
Guest
I would be very sure you have a calling to / love of the Tridentine Mass first…that is really the only reason to go FSSP from my experience.
I doubt BrooklynBoy, or anyone for that matter, would be discerning the Priesthood with the FSSP if they had a dislike for the TLM.I would be very sure you have a calling to / love of the Tridentine Mass first…that is really the only reason to go FSSP from my experience.
I really have to disagree here. The Traditional Mass is not the only reason to join a Traditional Order. There is much more to it.I would be very sure you have a calling to / love of the Tridentine Mass first…that is really the only reason to go FSSP from my experience.
I limited my comments to FSSP, where I have direct experience. By all means check them out and judge for yourself.I really have to disagree here. The Traditional Mass is not the only reason to join a Traditional Order. There is much more to it.
I must agree. While I do have a passion for the TLM, that’s not why I am leaving for my canidate year with a Traditonal Order. There is so much more, the complete Orthodoxy mainly, is what I am attracted to.I really have to disagree here. The Traditional Mass is not the only reason to join a Traditional Order. There is much more to it.
Just so that the Original Poster knows, going to the seminary right out of high school now adds another year on to the seminary training. I was recently informed of this by Fr. Berg, the Superior General of the FSSP. I believe the first year will cover general education, since Fr. Berg mentioned public speaking, etc…The seminary is a tradtional order seminary. You are in their seminary for 7 years no matter your previous education, although, sometimes they will make an exception, but very rare. But no, you would not have to have had any college, just have graduated from high school
Please don’t come on here and bash the FSSP. It is a Priestly Fraternity in good standing with the Church, it is flourishing, and it is disrespectable to do so.To be sure, theres more to it, at least in the case of FSSP. Clericalism, shoddy treatment of seminarians and even some of the staff (to include “Novus Ordo” priests). Orthodoxy is there, but so is some negative baggage, mostly courtesy of the French. One really has to be committed to the “Old Rite” to get thru it; otherwise you will look for Orthodoxy elsewhere ( a number of their priests have! ).
Again, go and judge for yourself…things may have improved. YMMV
In other words it is pretty much a… seminary!To be sure, theres more to it, at least in the case of FSSP. Clericalism, shoddy treatment of seminarians and even some of the staff (to include “Novus Ordo” priests). Orthodoxy is there, but so is some negative baggage, …
Oh yeah, I can testify to that!A priest with the Miles Christi told me that for their candidates some exposure to the world is necessary at least for a short period of time. He said it could be by attending a public school while growing up, too.
Well, there is the Institute of Christ the King of course (only the slight obstacle of the French languageIf what ORD Man is saying is true, then a great number of seminarians seem to be “putting up” with it. I certainly don’t mean to criticize, but if those who have had bad experiences with the Fraternity have alternatives that they think would be a better traditional order, I, as one seriously considering joining the FSSP, would certainly like to know.