C
cknick
Guest
Our Seminarian is distributing the Eucharist during communion, and is schedule to also hold a communion service this week, are these considered liturgically abusive?
Since “ordinary” laypeople can validly become Extraordinary Ministers of Holy Communion, I’m curious as to why you would think a Seminarian (also still a layman unless he has been ordained to the diaconate) distributing Communion would be abusive?Our Seminarian is distributing the Eucharist during communion, and is schedule to also hold a communion service this week, are these considered liturgically abusive?
Why do you think they may be abuses?Our Seminarian is distributing the Eucharist during communion, and is schedule to also hold a communion service this week, are these considered liturgically abusive?
Our present deacon was not allowed by our diocese to Lector or serve as an Extrodinary Minister during his formation in the deaconate program. Maybe this was a diocese thing, but I wonder if that is the same for those in priestly formation in some places?Why do you think they may be abuses?
Lay people regularly distribute communion. Lay people regularly lead communion services.
Why do you think a seminarian should be excluded from these activities?
That may be unique to your diocese, or unique to those becoming permanent deacons. In my experience, if Bob-the-seminarian is around and so is John-the-extraordinary-minister, Bob will get tapped more often. In part it may be that he’s around the parish office or rectory, or it may be especially to give him experiences that he might not otherwise have.Our present deacon was not allowed by our diocese to Lector or serve as an Extrodinary Minister during his formation in the deaconate program. Maybe this was a diocese thing, but I wonder if that is the same for those in priestly formation in some places?
Your original post said that the Seminarian was “distributing the Eucharist.”I thought I read somewhere that Seminarians were suppose to distribute the Precious Blood only. … .
Perhaps you misunderstoond. I was in the Diaconate program for 3 years ( until kids 4 and 5 came alongOur present deacon was not allowed by our diocese to Lector or serve as an Extrodinary Minister during his formation in the deaconate program. Maybe this was a diocese thing, but I wonder if that is the same for those in priestly formation in some places?
I wouldn’t think it’d ever qualify as an “abuse”, though.
That part IS specifically forbidden. His time to practice homiletics is during his Diaconal formational year, not as an unordained seminarian.. **He has been giving the homily from time **for a while, and I didn’t think they were allowed to do that either,.
It should be borne in mind that any previous norm that may have admitted non-ordained faithful to give the homily during the eucharistic celebration is to be considered abrogated by the norm of canon 767 §1.[145] This practice is reprobated, so that it cannot be permitted to attain the force of custom.
If the seminarian needs public speaking time, he may do so after the Communion, in the time reserved for parish announcements etc.[66.] The prohibition of the admission of laypersons to preach within the Mass applies also to seminarians, students of theological disciplines, and those who have assumed the function of those known as “pastoral assistants”; nor is there to be any exception for any other kind of layperson, or group, or community, or association
If he has been officially instituted as an acolyte by the Bishop, he may purify the sacred vessels.But it makes sense what you are saying about becoming an acolyte, because he just began purifying the vessels about two weeks ago.
Err, no. The homily must be given only by an ordained minister: deacon, priest, or bishop. No seminarians.He has been giving the homily from time for a while, and I didn’t think they were allowed to do that either, but I must be wrong about that, too.
Come to think of it, you’re right. As I recall, he said at one time that they were not “supposed to” participate in those ministries, and that was right at the beginning of his formation.Perhaps you misunderstoond. I was in the Diaconate program for 3 years ( until kids 4 and 5 came along)
What was asked of us was that if we were involved in those ministries, then we should stop them until told otherwise.
Once we were instituted as Readers, then we could (and should) Read at Mass. And then, when they advanced and were Instituted as Acolytes, then (and only then) were they to assist in the distribution of Holy Communion.
Seminarians, who are also canidates towards Holy Orders, generally follow the same format.
.
The one point I question is why the Communion Services? Is it simply because there is no daily Mass? That would be an abuse of the original intent of Communion Services.Our Seminarian is distributing the Eucharist during communion, and is schedule to also hold a communion service this week, are these considered liturgically abusive?
In this instance the Communion service is clearly an liturgical abuse for the faithful could attend the 6:30 Mass. Although even if the 6:30 Mass was not scheduled a Communion service scheduled in place of a daily Mass is unnecessary. I understand many Catholics have daily Mass as part of their prayer life…a Communion service is not the same as the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and it often appears that way when it is scheduled as its “replacement” as in these types of instances.This week the priests are on retreat. On our regular schedule, we have a priest saying mass at 6:30 daily, then for our regularly scheduled 8:30 mass, we have communion services scheduled through friday, with with the seminarian, now acolyte, to preside later in the week.
Because I wasn’t sure he wasn’t suppose to be giving the homily, I questioned him presiding over the communion service too, so I decided to ask…