C
challam2010
Guest
When it comes to complicated human behavior, the easy answer “from the book” is not always the right answer.
I’d agree that for a height-and-weight-appropriate person with normal eating habits, sitting down to Thanksgiving dinner and polishing off two whole terduckens and a pumpkin pie would fall under the gluttony umbrella and be sinful.
Carelessness about an all-junk-food diet for a “normal person” would also not follow guidelines about maintaining one’s health, which we are called to do.
However – those who have been truly obese since childhood or early teen years are dealing with a whole other pattern of behavior that clearly falls onto the eating disorder side of the equation. Study after study after study has shown a near-impossibility to correct long-term obesity in the majority of those obese patients who participated in the research. Some call it an addiction – some a pattern of uncontrollable behavior – and there are other fancy labels that describe this condition, as well.
It is far deeper than any conscious action or choice, which is one factor in determining sinfulness.
I’m not saying that all overeating gets a pass, but this problem isn’t as clear-cut as some would think. There are many physiological as well as psychological elements to obesity. There are mechanisms in the brain that affect how we eat and our reactions to food (variable from person to person), and there are really no concrete determinations about the various causes and no permanent solutions currently available or even in testing.
This is a medical problem, a psychological problem, a psycho-social problem, and it’s not solved by just labeling an eating pattern as “sinful gluttony,” or worse, mortally sinful gluttony.
It’s not a hopeless problem for everyone, but it’s certainly more complicated for many people than 52 trips to the confessional a year, beating oneself up for choices that are truly not consciously made.
A good bariatric physcian, a weight-loss counselor and a good spiritual director would be of more benefit, it my opinion, than layers of guilt.
I’d agree that for a height-and-weight-appropriate person with normal eating habits, sitting down to Thanksgiving dinner and polishing off two whole terduckens and a pumpkin pie would fall under the gluttony umbrella and be sinful.
Carelessness about an all-junk-food diet for a “normal person” would also not follow guidelines about maintaining one’s health, which we are called to do.
However – those who have been truly obese since childhood or early teen years are dealing with a whole other pattern of behavior that clearly falls onto the eating disorder side of the equation. Study after study after study has shown a near-impossibility to correct long-term obesity in the majority of those obese patients who participated in the research. Some call it an addiction – some a pattern of uncontrollable behavior – and there are other fancy labels that describe this condition, as well.
It is far deeper than any conscious action or choice, which is one factor in determining sinfulness.
I’m not saying that all overeating gets a pass, but this problem isn’t as clear-cut as some would think. There are many physiological as well as psychological elements to obesity. There are mechanisms in the brain that affect how we eat and our reactions to food (variable from person to person), and there are really no concrete determinations about the various causes and no permanent solutions currently available or even in testing.
This is a medical problem, a psychological problem, a psycho-social problem, and it’s not solved by just labeling an eating pattern as “sinful gluttony,” or worse, mortally sinful gluttony.
It’s not a hopeless problem for everyone, but it’s certainly more complicated for many people than 52 trips to the confessional a year, beating oneself up for choices that are truly not consciously made.
A good bariatric physcian, a weight-loss counselor and a good spiritual director would be of more benefit, it my opinion, than layers of guilt.