G
gramma
Guest
Times have changed. There are not many historical accounts of maternity clothing on the internet. I can testify that maternity fashions have changed in the past 20-30 years. Women today wear maternity clothes that show off every curve of their body exposing a baby growing within. There are many websites picturing pregnant bellies at various stages of pregnancy, twin or triplet bellies, stretch marks on bellies, ethnic skin color bellies and it doesn’t stop there. There are c-section pictures, vaginal delivery pictures, and breast feeding pictures and still it doesn’t stop. Starting with the April 30th LIFE magazine cover we’ve seen the womb inside and out. Need I show you all the pictures of life within the womb?
I grew up a country farm girl with a great sensitivity to nature. One thing that always got my attention was the private, covered matter of pregnancy, birth and infancy in the animal world. It was that way for humans as well – about thirty or more years ago. My mother wore maternity clothes made of generous amounts of loose fitting fabric and so did I. They were comfortable, modest and didn’t fit snuggly until the last 2-3 weeks. It isn’t easy to find maternity underpants that cover the whole belly. Most maternity underpants are bikini style
Even I have been caught up in the fashion of exposing life in the womb. When a digital picture of my granddaughter was sent to me I was ecstatic. After that I forwarded it to a few close connections but then later regretted it. Somehow I felt that I had violated what God meant to remain hidden for now. If God wanted us to see what was going on in the womb then there would be a little flap or window for convenient viewing.
The exposure is our unborn and newly born seems way out of hand and beyond God’s order of the blessed event.
Am I too old fashion - behind the times – too old to ride the range – full of crusty stale ideas? Have we allowed our penchant for modern day media expose that which should be kept most private and protected? Shouldn’t maternity, life in the womb and birthing be kept more private and less available to looky loos?
I grew up a country farm girl with a great sensitivity to nature. One thing that always got my attention was the private, covered matter of pregnancy, birth and infancy in the animal world. It was that way for humans as well – about thirty or more years ago. My mother wore maternity clothes made of generous amounts of loose fitting fabric and so did I. They were comfortable, modest and didn’t fit snuggly until the last 2-3 weeks. It isn’t easy to find maternity underpants that cover the whole belly. Most maternity underpants are bikini style
Even I have been caught up in the fashion of exposing life in the womb. When a digital picture of my granddaughter was sent to me I was ecstatic. After that I forwarded it to a few close connections but then later regretted it. Somehow I felt that I had violated what God meant to remain hidden for now. If God wanted us to see what was going on in the womb then there would be a little flap or window for convenient viewing.
The exposure is our unborn and newly born seems way out of hand and beyond God’s order of the blessed event.
Am I too old fashion - behind the times – too old to ride the range – full of crusty stale ideas? Have we allowed our penchant for modern day media expose that which should be kept most private and protected? Shouldn’t maternity, life in the womb and birthing be kept more private and less available to looky loos?