M
Meggie
Guest
Scenerio:
A professor, a bit foreign, a bit loopy assigns a closed-book essay exam. Several students suggest they have bad handwriting and want to use a laptop to type answers. The professor agrees, class dismissed.
The student with learning disabilities stays behind to speak with the professor. Said student gets special accomidations for this (separate testing area) and said student’s participation makes classmates believe student is teacher’s pet.
On his/her way out she runs into a group of her classmates who are discussing the use of laptops in order to copy thier notes on and cheat. Cheating would normally only damage cheaters, but this is a newer class with a new book and the professor plans to curve. A large number of cheaters could dramatically shift this. So student who heard must consider his/her own final grade as well as other non-cheating classmates. Morally what should said student do?
A professor, a bit foreign, a bit loopy assigns a closed-book essay exam. Several students suggest they have bad handwriting and want to use a laptop to type answers. The professor agrees, class dismissed.
The student with learning disabilities stays behind to speak with the professor. Said student gets special accomidations for this (separate testing area) and said student’s participation makes classmates believe student is teacher’s pet.
On his/her way out she runs into a group of her classmates who are discussing the use of laptops in order to copy thier notes on and cheat. Cheating would normally only damage cheaters, but this is a newer class with a new book and the professor plans to curve. A large number of cheaters could dramatically shift this. So student who heard must consider his/her own final grade as well as other non-cheating classmates. Morally what should said student do?