R
ratio1
Guest
Depending on the hymn, all options are available to me.
perhaps they try singing it themselves before they were published?
The traditional hymns were written for congregational singing, to combine: being singable by a wide range of voices, to be musically interesting, and to sound best when sung by a congregation (rather than a soloist). The modern “songs” (for they generally aren’t hymns) usually lack one of these qualities, if not all three. Men, in particular, struggle with many modern songs - and usually don’t bother.Haha, funny.Really, I think a lot of people have the same problem. It would be nice if we could have the music rewritten, present day, to be compatible with everyone’s voices/ranges.
Good observation. My own parish has a participation rate of more than 50%, but I’ve visited parishes where, it seems, the vast majority simply refuse to sing and leave it to the cantor or choir, no matter what the hymn/song, so perhaps that’s why the cantor or choir choose music which suits them. As you say, chicken and egg.I thinks there is a lot of truth to that, but I don’t know whether the chicken or the egg cane first. Some congregations seem unwilling to sing no matter what the song is. I was visiting a parish this summer and the cantor had chosen some very basic music, but I could hear almost no one else singing. I think some cantors and choir directors have decided that if people won’t sing anyway, they might as well choose music that sounds interesting as a solo or with just a choir.