D
dominikus28
Guest
Was iconoclasm (the destruction of art) of Pagan art ever a policy or supported by the Church?
I have heard some saint supported iconoclasm, and I have also noticed that during the Catholic middle ages, artists painted pagan art, like ancient Greek mythology, etc. Was this type of art ever forbidden or frowned upon by the church?
It seems to me that it would be ok as long as it isn’t seen as a faith. For example, images of Buddha are fashionable these days, and so I guess it would be ok to have a Buddha as long as you don’t believe in his religion (which would compromise your Catholic faith). I look at it the same way as for example, having a painting of King Arthur - you can look at it as a symbol of courage, not a real event because it is a myth. So could you look at Buddha as a myth and not fact? Am I correct in this?
Thanks
I have heard some saint supported iconoclasm, and I have also noticed that during the Catholic middle ages, artists painted pagan art, like ancient Greek mythology, etc. Was this type of art ever forbidden or frowned upon by the church?
It seems to me that it would be ok as long as it isn’t seen as a faith. For example, images of Buddha are fashionable these days, and so I guess it would be ok to have a Buddha as long as you don’t believe in his religion (which would compromise your Catholic faith). I look at it the same way as for example, having a painting of King Arthur - you can look at it as a symbol of courage, not a real event because it is a myth. So could you look at Buddha as a myth and not fact? Am I correct in this?
Thanks