Palm Sunday prophesied to the day?!?!

  • Thread starter Thread starter nordskoven
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
N

nordskoven

Guest
Jesus said:
• **Luke 19:41-42 – “Now as He drew near, He saw the city and wept over it, **42 saying,
**“If you had known, even you, especially in this your day, the things *that make ***for
**your peace! But now they are hidden from your eyes.” **
Daniel and Nehemiah prophesied Messiah’s coming. Jesus Christ’s triumphal entry into Jerusalem was given in Daniel 9:24-27. The specific year and day given confounded St. Augustine, who relied on the Roman calender, but he wisely kept the faith. When these figures are correlated with the Jewish calendar, done by the Greenwich Observatory in modern times at the request of a former Scotland Yard detective, using the 360 day Jewish canonical year correlates with 32 A.D. Daniel and Nehemiah prophesied Christ’s triumphal entry into Jerusalem as the Shepherd-King riding on the symbol of peace and bounty, the work vehicle of the day, the donkey; not a war-horse. If only the people had known the time of their visitation–but they were too Romanized, probably using the Roman calendar. Praise God that there’s nothing to quibble about here.

Son of David, all thanks and praise, glory and honor be Yours now and forever; please heal all hearts and minds; bodies and souls for the glory of Your Name. AMEN
 
I would like more information. There have been times when I have tried to research this, but most research, I find, is like the ugly sister trying to squeeze her foot into the glass slipper.

I’m convinced that He was crucified on Friday 3rd April 33AD. The main reason for my belief is the lunar eclipse that occured that day which caused the moon to be “blood red” (Joel 2:31, Acts 2:16).

I’ve often been intrigued and interested to research the Daniel prophecy… but I’ve always been disappointed.

P.S. Christ’s triumphant entry into Jerusalem was on a Monday, not a Sunday. I guess the Catholic’s celebrate it on a Sunday for convenience.
 
I would like more information. There have been times when I have tried to research this, but most research, I find, is like the ugly sister trying to squeeze her foot into the glass slipper.

I’m convinced that He was crucified on Friday 3rd April 33AD. The main reason for my belief is the lunar eclipse that occured that day which caused the moon to be “blood red” (Joel 2:31, Acts 2:16).

I’ve often been intrigued and interested to research the Daniel prophecy… but I’ve always been disappointed.

P.S. Christ’s triumphant entry into Jerusalem was on a Monday, not a Sunday. I guess the Catholic’s celebrate it on a Sunday for convenience.
Joel 2:31 is not about Good Friday or the crucifixion of Jesus. It is an end times prophesy so your dating method is erroneous. Jesus had to be born before 4 BC as that was the year that King Herod died. King Herod was the Jewish King who ordered the slaughter of the babies in Bethlehem that were 2 years and younger. Obviously he could not have done that after he died. His death in 4 BC is pretty well established historically. So Jesus could have been born as early as 6 BC.
 
So Jesus could have been born as early as 6 BC.
Sure, but that just means HE was older at death. Scripture never says HE was 30 or 33 years old when He died. If born in 6BC, He would have been 35 or 38 years old (subtracting out the nonexistent year 0).
 
Sure, but that just means HE was older at death. Scripture never says HE was 30 or 33 years old when He died. If born in 6BC, He would have been 35 or 38 years old (subtracting out the nonexistent year 0).
Or He died in 27 AD.
 
Joel 2:31 is not about Good Friday or the crucifixion of Jesus. It is an end times prophesy so your dating method is erroneous.
Actually, making it an end times prophecy then trying to understand the details of dating is backwards.

Through the ages many have not believed the eschatology you propose, and have instead seen this as being fulfilled in Christ at the Cross.

In a scriptural context: What greater tribulation than a Holy God placing himself in the hands of sinful men? He was rushed to the cross, and had the days of His tribulation not been shortened, had he been beaten to death and never made it to the cross, no flesh would have been saved.

In sensus plenior the sun is Christ in Holiness and law. As the Light, when Christ came into the world he condemned us (John 3). The sun turned to darkness indicates that Law has been changed to grace. The moon represents Christ in the flesh and “life is in the blood” and so Christ in the flesh is alive… He is risen!

And what greater day or what day more terrible than that of the cross? And what followed the cross?
Joel 2:32 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the LORD shall be delivered:
He who condemns a righteous man is an abomination… so Judas was an abomination. The Father left the Son on the cross, and the Son was made to be sin. What greater desolation… where is God on earth? So the kiss of Judas is the abomination that caused desolation.

When Jesus said “It is finished!” I believe it.

Pr 25:2 It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.

If it is literal, have you checked to see if the billions of the whole population of the world will fit into the valley of Jehoshaphat?
Joel 3:2 I will also gather all nations, and will bring them down into the valley of Jehoshaphat,
So if the dates make it speak of the cross, it is consistent with Christian beliefs until the mid nineteenth century.
 
Sure, but that just means HE was older at death. Scripture never says HE was 30 or 33 years old when He died. If born in 6BC, He would have been 35 or 38 years old (subtracting out the nonexistent year 0).
Scripture doesn’t cite Jesus’ age at the time of His crucifixion, but St. Luke does let us know:
Luke 3:23 Jesus, when he began his ministry, was about thirty years of age,
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top