Papal Infallibility

[ASimpleSinner]

Again, you do not know me and you make a snide remarks. Classic.

Show the snide remark made about you please.

How well do I have to know you to have read more than once in your 7040+ posts that you were a Latin, then a Greek Catholic and now Orthodox - From allusions you have made this has happened in the past several years… So I was asking U-C how concerned U-C was about how long you had been an Eastern Christian… Alas, how long I have been seemed to be important to U-C.

Back handed ad-hominem. Classic.

Have you ever considered anger management classes?

Such delusions of persecution continue.

At every instance where you have been asked to highlight an example of personal attack you have only proceeded to actually personally attack me.

In the past few days I get:

Ecscuuuuuse me!
You just cannot help yourself–how sad.
one post from you that is not colored with arrogance
tough guy
Don’t try to be a mind reader–kay
Mr Swami,
your vindictive diatribe.
A.S.S.

… yes, ad hominem attacks, character assasination, and sarcasm before just opting out of the discussion.

Now today we add to the list “anger management” snyde remark.

 

[ematouk]

This thread is dedicated to the doctrine of Papal Infallibility. I do not mean offense by this, but I would greatly appreciate it if all posts and responses could be constructive rather then delving into your own personal lives.

If you wish to discuss in what way you have ad hominem attacked eachother, then please do so in private messages.

I do not mean to sound so aggressive, but it is annoying to notice a response appears on the forum (in my email box) and then realise it is unconstructive posts and private attacks.

Would someone please be able to direct me to Catholic sources or apologetic material dealing with the historical aspect of papal infallibility that I have outlined in my post above?

God bless you mardukm for your constructive posts, even when I disagree with them.

 

[Deconi]

How about just reading your Bible then?

From the Holy lips of Our Founder; “Blessed are you Simon Bar Jonah, for it is not men that tell you this, but my Father in Heaven Who reveals this to you.”

Clearly, there are revelations made to Peter alone, through his head!

“And I tell you that you are Peter, and upon this ‘Rock’ I will build my church, ** and the gates of hell will not overcome it.” !! **

Hmm. That’s a heck of thing to promise for ALL TIME!

“And I will give you the Keys of the Kingdom and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in Heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in Heaven.”!!

Aww. I see. When Pete uses the Keys on earth, there’s a corresponding action in Heaven. IN HEAVEN!!! In THE Kingdom of Heaven?!! What if he looses Abortion, or prostitution, or slavery, or murder, or paedophilia, or…

Oh WAIT! Since the Father “gets into Pete’s head” when it comes to revelations of THE TRUTH, that means The Father CONTINUES to do the same WHEN HE USES THE KEYS!!!

Oh, my!

Brilliant!

Simple, but BRILLIANT!

 

[Mickey]

Such delusions of persecution continue.

Keep em comin Mr Swami!

At every instance where you have been asked to highlight an example of personal attack you have only proceeded to actually personally attack me.

The readers can discern your posts for themselves. I do not need to sift through your posts and keep keep listing your snide insults.

Now today we add to the list “anger management” snyde remark.

That is not meant to sarcastic. I truly believe you are in need of assistance.

 

[Mickey]

In the past few days I get:

Each of these are responses to your extreme bitterness. Mr Swami is in reference to your inference at times to know what others are thinking. A.S.S are the initials of your screen name (ASimpleSinner). In my haste on Friday it did not dawn on me that these initials also describe a donkey. Sorry.

 

[Mickey]

Aww. I see. When Pete uses the Keys on earth

Is it common in your Church to refer to the holy Apostle St Peter as “Pete”?!?

 

[Mickey]

This thread is dedicated to the doctrine of Papal Infallibility. I do not mean offense by this, but I would greatly appreciate it if all posts and responses could be constructive rather then delving into your own personal lives.

My apologies. You are correct. I know better than to get dragged into these kindergarten games.

 

[Mickey]

Thus lacking a moral unanimity or even a clear two-thirds majority, Papal Infallibility was now elevated as an article of faith equal to the Holy Trinity and the Incarnation. A belief that could not possibly meet the Vincentian canon of Universality, Antiquity and Consent, and in fact a belief not universally shared by Catholics even within living memory of the Council that solemnly defined it.
orthodoxinfo.com/inquirers/papaldogma.aspx

 

[Michael_Francis]

Due to failing charity this thread is now closed.
MF