Papal infallibility

[thessalonian]

Hans Kung remains a Catholic priest in good standing, but the Vatican has rescinded his authority to teach Catholic theology. Why? I do not know.

Could it be that he rejects Vatican I’s statements on papal infallibility? He teaches heresy? yep, could be.

 

[ziapueblo]

Could it be that he rejects Vatican I’s statements on papal infallibility? He teaches heresy? yep, could be.

Oh. I had never heard of Hung until yesterday. Thanks

 

[steve_b]

Could it be that he rejects Vatican I’s statements on papal infallibility? He teaches heresy? yep, could be.

Yep :yup:

For anybody reading this forum and interested in an answer WHY Kung shouldn’t be followed, there’s a short and a long answer.

short answer
http://www.ewtn.com/vexperts/showre...rk=212&ORDER_BY_TXT=ORDER+BY+ID+DESC&start_at=

188 pg thorough answer.
http://www.ewtn.com/library/THEOLOGY/KUNGINF.htm

 

[Mickey]

Ludwig Ott, Dogma of Catholicism is the best answer. The two is the two that were declared since infallibility was declared as dogma. IC and Assumption. But that does not mean there were not other papal statements before that. And Ott tells you what they were. There are around 20.

So it is twenty? Ludwig Ott is our expert here?

 

[Mickey]

To my knowledge, there is no list of infallible papal decrees that have been infallibly acknowledged as such by a Pope.

 

[Mickey]

Could it be that he rejects Vatican I’s statements on papal infallibility? He teaches heresy? yep, could be.

Now I am very confused. He is a priest in good standing yet he cannot teach? How odd.