Papal Infallibility

  • Thread starter Thread starter EPR_97
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jelway said:
Thanks but you never really answered my question. If our current Pope suggests he is not perfect (Did he or am I wrong) how is he at the same time infallible. Pope Francis just doesn’t strike me as someone who would declare he is infallible.
Click to expand...
HEEEEEEEEELLLLLLLLLPPPPPPP ! :banghead:
 
Jelway said:
Thanks but you never really answered my question. If our current Pope suggests he is not perfect (Did he or am I wrong) how is he at the same time infallible. Pope Francis just doesn’t strike me as someone who would declare he is infallible.
Click to expand...
Did Peter sin? Did Peter have to be confronted by Paul for his sin? Did Peter write two inspired, inerrant texts of the New Testament?

Yes to all three.

Did Peter infallibly declare (seemingly against the old Testament) that Gentiles were saved by Grace and not by Circumcision? Was that declaration infallible? Was Peter still a sinner?

Yes to both.

Don’t leave Peter because of Judas…

Hope this Helps
God Bless,
Poor Knight for Christ and His Chruch
 
I will have to leave the Catholic Answers Forums because of the endless discussions that only result in more confusion than enlightenment.

I feel this website is causing me to commit the sin of anger and is also weakening my faith instead of strengthening it! :sad_bye:
 
Please do not forget Job in your list of biblical perfection. he paid much to prove he was so. never did understand how he got twice back in the end as his relatives and servants were taken.
 
Not to take aside from your point merely add to it. Jobs one my fav people in the bible. inspirational to me to stand a mortal and scream his questions and retorts to satan and God himself. He did not just bow n grovell he stood ground
 
ANGER is not a sin don’t think that. Jesus saw exploitations of the church exchanging money for currency spendable in that church at increasefmd rate exchange and saw them turning away sacrificial lambs peopke journeyed with to sacrificeto God sayn they needed to purchase thier rams to sacrifice and walked straight to the tables screaming at everyone flipped the tables over n then chewed some people out. ANGER ISN’T A SIN THAT’S THE PROBLEM ONLY THE WICKED AND EVIK ARE ANGRY. Yes some of these discussions are hard to follow but dont give up !!! NEVER GIVE UP Some of these people on here are greatly studied in things i will never bother to study but m learnin much n and glad they are studying what they are it has great purpose to know the doctrines and positions. i merely pose questions I’ve never understood don’t let ANYONE SWAY U FROM YOUR QUEST DMFOR ENLIGHTENMENT…PLEASE.
 
I do know how you feel i sought answers to questions I’ve had for long timesome of them decades and haven’t recieved a single one i sought yet i am learning and that’s bettern nothing. been sayn for years …the more i find out the less that i know.
 
istilllookup said:
ANGER is not a sin don’t think that. Jesus saw exploitations of the church exchanging money for currency spendable in that church at increasefmd rate exchange and saw them turning away sacrificial lambs peopke journeyed with to sacrificeto God sayn they needed to purchase thier rams to sacrifice and walked straight to the tables screaming at everyone flipped the tables over n then chewed some people out. ANGER ISN’T A SIN THAT’S THE PROBLEM ONLY THE WICKED AND EVIK ARE ANGRY. Yes some of these discussions are hard to follow but dont give up !!! NEVER GIVE UP Some of these people on here are greatly studied in things i will never bother to study but m learnin much n and glad they are studying what they are it has great purpose to know the doctrines and positions. i merely pose questions I’ve never understood don’t let ANYONE SWAY U FROM YOUR QUEST DMFOR ENLIGHTENMENT…PLEASE.
Click to expand...
Jesus’ anger wasn’t a sin…but when I get angry I start calling people filthy names, so it’s better to leave the occasion of sin.
 
truetofaith said:
Jesus’ anger wasn’t a sin…but when I get angry I start calling people filthy names, so it’s better to leave the occasion of sin.
Click to expand...
Look at it another way. In this venue, one has a chance to think about things for awhile before posting a response. It encourages discipline, and hones skills in debate…agreed? I agree, some posts can be a real test for one’s patience and charity, and let’s face it, we have complete control of the “send” button. Return posts can sit in “draft” mode for as long as it needs fixing, before hitting send…right? Or a response can just be ignored and no reply given. One’s response can… but doesn’t have to rise, to the level of an occasion to sin. Would you agree?
 
steve_b said:
Look at it another way. In this venue, one has a chance to think about things for awhile before posting a response. It encourages discipline, and hones skills in debate…agreed? I agree, some posts can be a real test for one’s patience and charity, and let’s face it, we have complete control of the “send” button. Return posts can sit in “draft” mode for as long as it needs fixing, before hitting send…right? Or a response can just be ignored and no reply given. One’s response can… but doesn’t have to rise, to the level of an occasion to sin. Would you agree?
Click to expand...
I agree that I should not respond until I cool down, but I’m also wasting a lot of time reading and answering posts. My email is packed with CAF Topics & I hate to just delete them without reading them.
 
truetofaith said:
I agree that I should not respond until I cool down, but I’m also wasting a lot of time reading and answering posts. My email is packed with CAF Topics & I hate to just delete them without reading them.
Click to expand...
Again, you’ve got complete control over that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top