F
forthright
Guest
I’ve been doing some reading on the Pope Formosus scandal as well as the Council of Nicea. It seems to me that the Council decided that the bishops, priests, and deacons should stay in their own diocese. Since Pope Formosus came from another diocese, before become bishop of the diocese of Rome, it was for this reason he was put on trial. (Am I right so far?)
Does this mean that for the centuries between Nicea and more recent times that the bishop of Rome was selected ONLY from the eligible members of the diocese of Rome (typically the priests of Rome)? Would a bishop of, say, Venice not even be considered? It seems odd that for centuries the pope would come straight from the local priesthood only. Just curious.
Does this mean that for the centuries between Nicea and more recent times that the bishop of Rome was selected ONLY from the eligible members of the diocese of Rome (typically the priests of Rome)? Would a bishop of, say, Venice not even be considered? It seems odd that for centuries the pope would come straight from the local priesthood only. Just curious.