H
HCC
Guest
Someone should point out that the country will be gaining far more in tax revenue from the Papal visit than they paid out.
The reasons you site for him not visiting are precisely the reasons he should visit. Besides, the official Catholic statistics for Mass attendance in England and Wales last year showed that over one million people attend Mass on any given Sunday - hardly “microscopic” ? Do you think it’s possible you’re succumbing to secular indoctrination ‘Face it Britain is lost…’ ?Interesting article on the HuffPo from Johann Hari…“appealing” to all decent Catholics to shun the Pope and join the protesters when he arrived. Heres the link
Honestly though…why is the Holy Father even bothering with Britain? They turned their back on God long ago…the Anglican Church is withering away, most of the populace don’t believe in anything, the cultural and political elites are stripping away every last vestige of Christianity, along with anything else that might interfere with their hedonism. The number of people who actually believe and bother to attend a Church is microscopic.
Face it, Britain is lost, along with Europe in general. Might as well move the Holy See to Africa or South America and leave that benighted place to the fate it has chosen for itself…
If the Pope really views the Archbishop of Canterbury as just another layperson why had a previous pope given the ABC his own Episcopal Ring and the current one given him a bishops pectoral cross?May be I am being naïve but I don’t see much of an issue. In effect he will just be shaking hands with another layperson as he will be when he shakes the Archbishop of Canterbury’s hand.
I cannot answer for the Holy Father chosing to make these gestures.If the Pope really views the Archbishop of Canterbury as just another layperson why had a previous pope given the ABC his own Episcopal Ring and the current one given him a bishops pectoral cross?
Thats true however, in the Orthodox (the other guys who view themselves as the TRUE CHURCH), due to the rules of economy, an Anglican Priest can does not require reordination just like a Catholic Priest doesn’t. I’m well aware we will talk ourselves in circles till we are blue on this, you aren’t the one who hasn’t re-examined Anglican Orders a hundered years after the initial bull was written and to be a good Catholic you have to believe they are otherwise but please don’t throw it in our faces by calling us an “Ecclesial Community” or the priests “ministers.” Its called being polite, its highly sought after, and used even by the people who wrote your bulls.I cannot answer for the Holy Father chosing to make these gestures.
One has to remember that (a) the Catholic Church has never abrogated the Papal Bull Apostolicæ Curæ, which declares Anglican orders to be null and void and (b) any Anglican who is received into the Catholic Church who was a minister in an Anglican ecclesial community who wants to be a Catholic priest has to be ordained (a sacrament the Church teaches can only ever be administered once).
I would like to make clear that I am not opposed to ecumenism. The Christian church is fractured and we should all pray for unity.Thats true however, in the Orthodox (the other guys who view themselves as the TRUE CHURCH), due to the rules of economy, an Anglican Priest can does not require reordination just like a Catholic Priest doesn’t. I’m well aware we will talk ourselves in circles till we are blue on this, you aren’t the one who hasn’t re-examined Anglican Orders a hundered years after the initial bull was written and to be a good Catholic you have to believe they are otherwise but please don’t throw it in our faces by calling us an “Ecclesial Community” or the priests “ministers.” Its called being polite, its highly sought after, and used even by the people who wrote your bulls.
I have never met a single Anglican priest who would rather or insisted on being called Minister. I would say that most Anglicans do view Ordination as a sacrament or at the very least a sacramental rite. The word is considered an insult because it is typically used (along with other words like it) to insinuate the invalidity of Anglican Orders. If you didn’t mean it in that regard I apologize. As for using church terminology in describing us as an “ecclesial community” I guarantee you that the pope, when he celebrates mass with the ABC will not refer to the Anglican Communion as a ecclesial community, that’s rude. Consider who you are talking to.I would like to make clear that I am not opposed to ecumenism. The Christian church is fractured and we should all pray for unity.
Thank you for advising me what the Eastern Orthodox churches do. I was truly ignorant of that fact.
I, of course, haven’t reviewed Anglican orders. However, I am not aware that the Catholic Church has officially taken a different stance. It is my understanding that Anglicans do not even consider Orders to be a sacrament. In calling you an ecclesial community I am, again, only using the Church’s terminology. Catholic priests are referred to as ministers. I do not see why you consider that word an insult. I think the problem there can be layed at your door. Some Anglicans would be insulted to be called ministers whereas others would find the title priest abhorrent. I cannot be held responsible for those differences you have amongst yourselves. I could not know which ‘camp’ you fall into.
I believe that the evangelical branch of the church of england does not like the term ‘priest’.I have never met a single Anglican priest who would rather or insisted on being called Minister.
I was under the belief that the anglican communion considered there were two sacraments: baptism and eucharist.I would say that most Anglicans do view Ordination as a sacrament or at the very least a sacramental rite.
The Pope may not use the term ecclesial community. However, I do not think it is likely that he will acknowledge the church of england or the anglican communion as churches. There is a document more contemporary than Apostolicæ Curæ that reminds Catholics that the term “sister churches” is to be restricted to the autocephalous Eastern Orthodox churches (I’m afraid I can’t recall it’s name).The word is considered an insult because it is typically used (along with other words like it) to insinuate the invalidity of Anglican Orders. If you didn’t mean it in that regard I apologize. As for using church terminology in describing us as an “ecclesial community” I guarantee you that the pope, when he celebrates mass with the ABC will not refer to the Anglican Communion as a ecclesial community, that’s rude. Consider who you are talking to.
I suppose…shows what happens when you spent too much time mired on The Guardian’s website…not to mention anything written by Johann Hari… (who seems to set new lows when it come to smug secularist self-righteousness…)The reasons you site for him not visiting are precisely the reasons he should visit. Besides, the official Catholic statistics for Mass attendance in England and Wales last year showed that over one million people attend Mass on any given Sunday - hardly “microscopic” ? Do you think it’s possible you’re succumbing to secular indoctrination ‘Face it Britain is lost…’ ?