A
AKDee
Guest
That Paul was a firebrand isn’t in dispute.
But you seem to reject half the New Testament with your stance. If that’s the case, I would suggest you impoverish yourself.
You are also rejecting the fact that Jesus himself called Paul to be an Apostle on the road to Damascus. He was a REAL Apostle.
What’s odd is I find myself a bit stunned to be defending St. Paul. For a long time I didn’t like him. His personality is definitely abrasive at times. But does that make his teachings wrong? No. And some of what you are referring to is the disagreement that led to the First Council of Jerusalem. The Church needs people like St. Paul at the councils in order to hash out formal Church teaching and to define heresy. And St. Peter, originally in disagreement with St. Paul on some issues, later decided St. Paul was right.
But you seem to reject half the New Testament with your stance. If that’s the case, I would suggest you impoverish yourself.
You are also rejecting the fact that Jesus himself called Paul to be an Apostle on the road to Damascus. He was a REAL Apostle.
What’s odd is I find myself a bit stunned to be defending St. Paul. For a long time I didn’t like him. His personality is definitely abrasive at times. But does that make his teachings wrong? No. And some of what you are referring to is the disagreement that led to the First Council of Jerusalem. The Church needs people like St. Paul at the councils in order to hash out formal Church teaching and to define heresy. And St. Peter, originally in disagreement with St. Paul on some issues, later decided St. Paul was right.