Peer reviewed articles supporting creationism

[Bonocorium]

Are there any peer reviewed scientific articles supporting Creationism? One person told me there was none.

 

[Dolezal]

Are there any peer reviewed scientific articles supporting Creationism? One person told me there was none.

Creationism and intelligent design are not scientific theories. God is a necessary object and cannot as such be part of any scientific theory. Philosophically speaking, intelligent design arguments are not successful. I wish Catholics would drop weak arguments such intelligent design because they do not sufficiently justify theism. If you are looking for serious arguments for the existence of God, check out the English articles on Emanuel Rutten’s website and Alexander Pruss’s blog.

 

[Glomung]

To be blunt, no. No more than there are peer reviewed scientific articles on the qualities of fairy dust.

Science is about comparing knowns against unknowns to be able to specify and classify the unknowns. It is a collection of knowledge by a standardized method.

When you bring in the notion of unique actors or unique occurances that cannot be repeated, what you describe may be true, but it is not science.
Science has many limitations, often forgotten by both scientists and non-scientists.