B
BornInMarch
Guest
Could a Muslim person please explain what People of the Book are?
If a single country that is officially Christian were to introduce the kinds of restrictions on advocacy of Islam that many countries governed by sharia law impose on people who advocate Christianity, then would anybody in the news media describe the imposition of those new restrictions as the according of tolerance and autonomy to Muslims?In Islam, the Qur’an is taken to represent the completion of these scriptures, and to synthesize them as God’s true, final, and eternal message to humanity. Because the People of the Book recognize the God of Abraham, Yahweh (Hebrew: יהוה) as the one and only god, as do Muslims, and they practice revealed faiths based on divine ordinances, tolerance and autonomy is accorded to them in societies governed by sharia (Islamic divine law).
While this may be true it is difficult to say with certainty to as to who indeed were the people of the Book. I have read different explanations by Muslims and it was not as clear cut as we would like it to be. AFAIK, the people of the Book were those that were given written messages by God before Muhammad. These included the Jews and Christians for obvious reason that they had holy scriptures but then there were also of adherents of other religions that had similar scriptures of their own. Zoroastrians were among them but since Islam believes in something like 400,000 prophets, some Muslims do include the Hindus as people of the book too.I am not a Muslim but Jews and Christians are people of the book.
It is certain that Jews and Christians are among the people of the Book in Islam. Muslim scholars debate about the other religions.I am not a Muslim but Jews and Christians are people of the book.
**Catholics are not People of the Book.It is certain that Jews and Christians are among the people of the Book in Islam. Muslim scholars debate about the other religions.
I know but that is how we are referred to. The Koran wouldn’t say about the Magisterium.**Catholics are not People of the Book.
According to Catholic teaching, the Faith of Christ is not found solely in the Christian Scriptures, but also in the Sacred Tradition and Magisterium of the Church.
The Catholic faith existed before the first ‘bible’ as we know it was written and it would have existed even if the Bible was never collated.**
It is a reference to Christians and Jews.Could a Muslim person please explain what People of the Book are?
If there would not be the revelation which came to Jesus so there would not be Christianity. And if that revelation would not be saved as Bible so that the Christian faith would not be saved. The problem is with (as you mention) Church’s doctrines which were established later. So Qur’an invoke and call Christians(people of Book and Revelation) to consider Revelation. That is the reason why Qur’an tell “People of the Book”.**Catholics are not People of the Book.
According to Catholic teaching, the Faith of Christ is not found solely in the Christian Scriptures, but also in the Sacred Tradition and Magisterium of the Church.
The Catholic faith existed before the first ‘bible’ as we know it was written and it would have existed even if the Bible was never collated.**
We follow Jesus that is why we are Christians. I would quibble with your statement that revelation came to Jesus. Jesus was the revelation.If there would not be the revelation which came to Jesus so there would not be Christianity.
Christianity does not rely on Scripture. As was pointed out to you, Christianity existed before the New Testament. Christianity did not come out of the Bible, the Bible came out of the Church.And if that revelation would not be saved as Bible so that the Christian faith would not be saved.
.The problem is with (as you mention) Church’s doctrines which were established later
What revelation are you referring too? Could you explain a little more?So Qur’an invoke and call Christians(people of Book and Revelation) to consider Revelation. That is the reason why Qur’an tell “People of the Book”.
Islam, Qur’an or Allah do not aimed and purposed to kill Pagans and others. Pagans fought against Islam to abolish it and Muslims retaliated. Firstly Pagans tortured and killed Muslims to destroy Islam by power and wars. Pagans arranged tribes and set armed forces to wipe out Islam. Allah allowed Muslims to retaliate in same way. And when Muslims were winner Muslims did not tortured anyone. And Islam did not force anyone to get faith by force. Islam give people choices. Slavers of war were allowed to get free with ransom money. Islam abated slavery gradually.Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism and Slavery
by M A Khan
…
…
Before Prophet Muhammad died about a year later, he seemed to have changed his mind again, whereby he wanted to give no quarters to the Jews and Christians in Islamic territories, similar to the way the idolaters had already been exterminated from Arabia. This was spelled in one of his three final wishes in his death-bed that ‘two religions should not be allowed to remain in the peninsula of the Arabs.’ A hadith also affirms this: ‘It has been narrated by ‘Omar b. al-Khattab that he heard the Messenger of Allah say: ‘I will expel the Jews and Christians from the Arabian Peninsula and will not leave any but Muslim’’ [Muslim 129. Muir, p. 402 19:4366]. Accordingly, Caliph Omar cleansed the Arabian Peninsula of the Jews and Christians [Bukhari 3:39:53]. the Jews and Christians [Bukhari 3:39:53].
Islam, therefore, accords a choice between conversion to Islam and death to Polytheists (Pagans, idolaters, heathens, animists and atheists etc.), while the Christians and Jews are to be reduced into a humiliated and heavily exploited subhuman entity. It should be noted that a greater majority of the world population during Muhammad’s time were Polytheists living in India, China, South and North America, and Africa. Many of these peoples, notably in India and China, had created valuable and creative civilization since the ancient times. With one stroke of the theology of Islam, they were rendered to be either brutally converted to Islam or violently dispatched to the fire of hell by a rather uncultured and backward people, who had no achievements of note until that time.
Jesus was a prophet but not God. So God send revelation through angel. Jesus fulfilled the work of prophethood after about 30 years old. So if Jesus was God initially why did He not do that job?=adrift;12953863]We follow Jesus that is why we are Christians. I would quibble with your statement that revelation came to Jesus. Jesus was the revelation.
If you mean Bible was written 60-90 years later! The disciplines which apostles took from Jesus was revelation and it is not important if that revelation was written later. Prophets set laws of religion according to revelation. If Church added or reduced something from scripture that is Church’s false.Christianity does not rely on Scripture. As was pointed out to you, Christianity existed before the New Testament. Christianity did not come out of the Bible, the Bible came out of the Church.
Jesus did not imply any such thing like Trinity. And Church established and developed those later.I need more of explanation of what you mean but Jesus established the doctrines. Came later? Developed later but not established later no.
You believe Jesus was God but Islam do not approve that. Jesus was a prophet. Prophet preach people and teach the faith and worshipping. And prophet do all that according to revelation. If a prophet did not get a new revelation then that prophet implement the previous revelation as many prophets did.What revelation are you referring too? Could you explain a little more?
Your question is not clear. I do not understand what you are askingJesus was a prophet but not God. So God send revelation through angel. Jesus fulfilled the work of prophethood after about 30 years old. So if Jesus was God initially why did He not do that job?
You are really confusing. From your post I know that English is not your first language. You often have incomplete sentences which make understanding what you mean difficult.If you mean Bible was written 60-90 years later! The disciplines which apostles took from Jesus was revelation and it is not important if that revelation was written later. Prophets set laws of religion according to revelation. If Church added or reduced something from scripture that is Church’s false.
This is a false statement.Jesus did not imply any such thing like Trinity
Again a false statement since it was taught from the beginning as evidence that it was written down.. And Church established and developed those later.
No I believe Jesus IS God.You believe Jesus was God
Islam is wrong:shrug:but Islam do not approve that.
This I understand is your belief but it doesn’t really explain what Islam means by people of the book.Jesus was a prophet. Prophet preach people and teach the faith and worshipping. And prophet do all that according to revelation. If a prophet did not get a new revelation then that prophet implement the previous revelation as many prophets did.
Jesus started to preach people as a prophet in His 30 years old. Prophet Muhammed was 40 years old when He became prophet. I mean Jesus was not God but He was human and just like other prophet He became prophet and performed miracles. If Jesus were God He would not wait until 30. There is nothing else which could make Jesus God.=adrift;12954557]Your question is not clear. I do not understand what you are asking![]()
Torah and Bible was revelation from God. So people who regard these revelation are to be People of Book. Church compiled the revelation which came to prophets Moses and Jesus. If the source of a text is divine revelation then that scripture is to be divine scripture. If you reduce revelation from scripture then there will not be anything to regard. And except revelation nobody can establish a divine religion.You are really confusing. From your post I know that English is not your first language. You often have incomplete sentences which make understanding what you mean difficult.
The Bible is complicated. We have the Jewish Scriptures and then you have the New Testament. They weren’t brought together and compiled into one “book” until the second century. It was the Church that decided what books would be included and excluded from the Bible through the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. This is really a simple explanation and it really much more complicated.
You came to this conclusion how? Jesus forgave sins only God can forgive sins. Jesus said He is God. I don’t see the link between how old Jesus was and His being God:shrug:Jesus started to preach people as a prophet in His 30 years old. Prophet Muhammed was 40 years old when He became prophet. I mean Jesus was not God but He was human and just like other prophet He became prophet and performed miracles. If Jesus were God He would not wait until 30. There is nothing else which could make Jesus God.
If I understand you correctly, then there is little disagreement. Scripture is divinely inspired where we disagree Is that the Holy Spirit is God who inspires and leads us.Torah and Bible was revelation from God. So people who regard these revelation are to be People of Book. Church compiled the revelation which came to prophets Moses and Jesus. If the source of a text is divine revelation then that scripture is to be divine scripture. If you reduce revelation from scripture then there will not be anything to regard. And except revelation nobody can establish a divine religion.
Holy Spirit is a ghost god. Even if you assume Holy Spirit lead Church to compile revelation here yet Holy Spirit do not add something into revelation. So we must regard the revelation which revealed to Jesus. And that revelation was compiled as Bible.
So the people of the book our Jews and Christians.Christians believe in Bible so Christians are People of the Book.
You are right and not part of this discussion.The Trinity is a long issue…