S
STT
Guest
So to you things and changes are for vain? No growth, no maturity, etc.Perhaps your view of perfection requires some additional consideration.
First, change being the “result of a tendency toward an end” is chokingly narrow and fatalist and I see no particular reason to be bound to that definition. I’m a rather big fan of the old Greek philosophy that change is simply an observable displacement. It can be spatial, temporal - whatever you like. I think the only binding rule is that it must be observable so as to verifiably encounter change.
So what thing changes when a caterpillar turn into a butterfly?And the notion that change denotes a departure from perfection is pretty easy to dispute. A perfect caterpillar becomes a perfect butterfly - it changes and perfection is retained the whole way through. A perfect seed becomes a perfect sapling. I could go on ad nauseam.