I think you misunderstood me/took it out of context. 06convert said I was not suggesting that applied to you.
Oh I understand I was just trying to set up the post, just to establish experience in a certain area and how it didn’t work out well
They just do

Some more than others.
**I was told by one of my parents, that I would fall in love with someone and I would end up having to go that far, I thought about it and honestly I’m not crossing that bridge until I come to it. I’m not shut off form the idea, but neither will I try to push the agenda, if its gotta happen then We’ll cross that bridge then, that’s as far as i’ll move on that point **
no i am not saying that…not intentionally anyway - what part of what i wrote made you think that? (I will clarify whatever it is.)
But you did because according to you it’s a ultimate factor. Like it sounds as if there will be no compromise, if they are not good in the sac then there as good as done
huh?
what I mean is that she a run of mill girl, a girl who is basically fitting to a whole multitude of people, I’m saying the person we marry is basically fined tuned for each others frequency’s
of course, and I hope you find her.
Well no, that is not the definition of square.
**Then neither could the thing I said be considered square
**
Well maybe you don’t, which is fine. Some people do not have the same morals as you. Some people indulge their physical desires when given the opportunity.
Agree doesn’t make it right or Justifiable
Umm, bc divorce sucks. (absolute worst case scenario. I mean it’d have to be realllly bad and I still doubt two people would get a divorce if that were the
only reason.)
**I meant the relationship prior to marriage
**
It is very honorable and shows you have integrity, which are wonderful traits. I would indeed take note. Would I go on a date with them? Certainly. Would I enter into a serious relationship with them? Maybe. Would I marry them? No. I would not make a lifelong commitment with someone if I did not know them intimately. Seems like an unnecessary risk. That’s just me though.
then you can not be considered to live life to the fullest because that is a risk you didn’t take. Sex is not synonymous with love no matter what you think. So having sex with someone to see if you can love them is foolish.
All of these things are important. Determining if a person has these traits is done in different ways. Sexual ability is just one aspect of a person.
So how do they stack up compared to sex because the survey out now is woman prefer financial security more than sex. Sex is second, but for the 1st place winner it is financial security. Just look at Donald Trump and his woman
Certainly not. I just see it as an unnecessary risk. (marrying them without knowing them intimately). I’m not going to spend thousands of dollars on a wedding if an essential aspect of that person is unknown to me. Well maybe not essential, but…important. Similarly, I would not marry someone I had not lived with.
and you can still know what living with someone is going to be like without actually living with them.
If you were to make a list of the traits you would like your future spouse, don’t you think good at sex would be on it? Maybe it is of low importance to you - but surely it would be on that list.
But it wouldn’t be any where near a factor in determining if I can be with them I mean if say she is a virgin is there something saying she is going to be great. No. That;s part of the adventure is getting good together
You are worried you will be permanently single bc of this. I am saying that is a valid worry. I’m sure you will find girls willing to wait. Maybe - hopefully - one of these girls is the one for you. If you meet a girl who is your dream girl and you are her dream guy except she won’t marry you until you’ve had sex, my suggestion is to have sex with her! If you won’t, you may lose her. Hence, you are right to be worried.