perpetual virginity of Mary..T or F?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aidanbradypop
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Much has been made by certain posters about how the perpetual virginity of Mary makes a mockery of the Jewish marriage customs of the day, but those same people are adamant that Jesus was willing to offend his own family and make a mockery of Jewish customs regarding the responsibilities of sons to care for their own widowed mothers.
 
Randy Carson;11562882:
Your word “mockery” is hyperbole>who said that ? But here is what i have said on this matter per post # 218… I understand your point that.Jesus, being all knowing, could have foreseen James wonderful conversion, and said to Mary, “Mary, go live with James, though he can not console you know for his unbelief, he will eventually convert and be a solace to you”. Not too catchy or consoling to me. .Blood is not thicker than spirit . If I had young children and were going to die I would give them to a good friend who was a christian brother/sister more than to a blood brother who was not only not christian, but quite “anti-christian”. Faith demands this for Jesus said whoever does God’s will is my brother /mother etc. I am sorry, but Mary being given unto John and not faithless siblings is perfect, for the two hearts loved Jesus more than any two human beings on earth and were "kindred spirit’ about the mission ahead, beyond Calvary. Furthermore, we are all aware of sin and it’s consequences.Though you may be forgiven, sometimes the consequence may hurt (think David and Bathsheba forgiveness yet with consequence of his children would rail against him for years)… You are correct that Mary, by tradition, should have been given to siblings.That it was not was a wake up call to their unbelief. I believe James may have been miffed at the beginning, but when he got saved he was quite humbled and understood it perfectly, and "being passed up’ made the siblings stronger. A bit like Peter’s denial yet his gracious triumphant “rebound”. He would never forget his depravity when in the flesh ,and how gracious it is to be in the spirit, to be set right, to be forgiven. No wonder James rebounded as much as Peter, for we believe he eventually became bishop in Jerusalem and even wrote scripture. Can you imagine being Jesus’s brother and not just totally missing “it”, but being against it. So close to the creator of the universe yet so lost…Quite a story …may it grip you to the heart as it does
me.

No, I can’t imagine being brought up with Mary’s guidance and Jesus’s constant example for multiple years, not just three and not “getting it.” We’re talking God here and not your run of the mill family.

You have yourself a touching story, but that’s not what was passed down from the Apostles. “We need to remember what we were taught by word and letter.”
 
Where do you get the idea that to non-Catholics, God’s authority “apparently needs to feel absolutely, completely perfect” and should “completely conform to what WE feel is right”???
If people weren’t satisfied with and ready to submit to the authority of the only Christian Church that existed for over a thousand years, they wouldn’t have gone out and made their own.
 
pocohombre;11568699:
No, I can’t imagine being brought up with Mary’s guidance and Jesus’s constant example for multiple years, not just three and not “getting it.” We’re talking God here and not your run of the mill family.

You have yourself a touching story, but that’s not what was passed down from the Apostles. “We need to remember what we were taught by word and letter.”
no direct evidence from apostles only hearsay from 2 nd 3rd centuries
 
No, I can’t imagine being brought up with Mary’s guidance and Jesus’s constant example for multiple years, not just three and not “getting it.” We’re talking God here and not your run of the mill family.

You have yourself a touching story, but that’s not what was passed down from the Apostles. “We need to remember what we were taught by word and letter.”
except for divine conception and the magi visit and a profound stint at the synagogue when 12 scripture indicates a normal appearance of jesus and his family
 
except for divine conception and the magi visit and a profound stint at the synagogue when 12 scripture indicates a normal appearance of jesus and his family
Wow … and which passages in the Bible describe this normal appearance of the family?

I seemed to have missed the one where all the kids were sitting round the table and Mary was trying to get them to sit still and eat while discussing whose turn it was to do the dishes.

Or the story about how the kids were out in the yard playing tag or was it hide and seek?

Maybe it was the wedding feast at Cana … no … Mary is the only family member noted as being present, no Joseph, no siblings … and then the events of that day were not “normal” …

Gosh - not sure how I missed all the stories about the ‘normal’ family in the bible :confused:
 
In all fairness, the same can be said with the Catholic Church as well.

American Catholic Church in the United States
Anglo-Lutheran Catholic Church
Antiochian Catholic Church in America
Breakaway Catholic Churches
Catholic Charismatic Church of Canada
Christ Catholic Church
Conclavism
Ecumenical Catholic Church
Evangelical Catholic Church
Fraternité Notre-Dame
Free Church of Antioch
Imani Temple African-American Catholic Congregation
Independent Sacramental Movement
Liberal Catholic Church
Mariavite Church
National Catholic Church of America
Old Catholic Church
Old Roman Catholic Church
Old Catholic Mariavite Church
Order of Corporate Reunion
Orthodox-Catholic Church of America
Polish National Catholic Church
Philippine Independent Catholic Church
The Young Rite

as well as the groups that we are not allowed to post 😉

I do not see how this has anything to do with the topic of the thread but felt the need to post it anyways. 🙂
I’m always amused when I see lists like these. There are over a billion Catholics in full communion with the Pope; these groups listed are microscopic by comparison. Either they are in communion with Rome or they aren’t, it’s just that simple.

Protestantism, on the other hand, has fragmented into hundreds, perhaps thousands, of individual denominations with no single leader. There are almost as many flavors of Lutheranism as you have listed above…then there are several groups of Presbyterians and an unknown number of Baptist denominations.

To attempt a comparison like this is silly.
 
I’m always amused when I see lists like these. There are over a billion Catholics in full communion with the Pope; these groups listed are microscopic by comparison. Either they are in communion with Rome or they aren’t, it’s just that simple.

Protestantism, on the other hand, has fragmented into hundreds, perhaps thousands, of individual denominations with no single leader. There are almost as many flavors of Lutheranism as you have listed above…then there are several groups of Presbyterians and an unknown number of Baptist denominations.

To attempt a comparison like this is silly.
We have since moved on to get back on topic but you are welcome to start a thread and we can talk about it there. 👍
 
We have since moved on to get back on topic but you are welcome to start a thread and we can talk about it there. 👍
I only skimmed this thread so I apologize if someone has brought this up, but Matthew is clear that Mary did not remain a virgin.

“But he had no union with her as her husband until she had borne her firstborn Son; and he called His name Jesus.” Matthew 1:25

How would Matthew know Mary didn’t remain a virgin? He most likely encountered Jesus’ bothers and sisters that are mentioned in other parts of the Gospels.

I am not Catholic so I don’t understand the importance to the Catholic denomination of Mary’s perpetual virginity, but if it were so important to the Christian religion as a whole, you would think the apostles would have mentioned it in the scriptures.
 
I only skimmed this thread so I apologize if someone has brought this up, but Matthew is clear that Mary did not remain a virgin.

“But he had no union with her as her husband until she had borne her firstborn Son; and he called His name Jesus.” Matthew 1:25
Until doesn’t mean anything occurred subsequently. It only means that it did not occur previously.

There is a verse in the OT that states that Michal “had no children until the day she died.”
Does that mean that Michal had children after she died? :whacky:

And here’s a verse from the NT: For he must reign, until he hath put all his enemies under his feet. -1Cor 15:25. Does that mean that Christ won’t reign after he has put all his enemies under his feet?
 
How would Matthew know Mary didn’t remain a virgin? He most likely encountered Jesus’ bothers and sisters that are mentioned in other parts of the Gospels.
The same way that St. Luke knew that Mary “kept these things and pondered in her heart.”
I am not Catholic so I don’t understand the importance to the Catholic denomination of Mary’s perpetual virginity, but if it were so important to the Christian religion as a whole, you would think the apostles would have mentioned it in the scriptures.
That’s a man-made tradition you’ve been duped into believing, drblank.

There is nothing in Scripture that states, “If it’s so important the apostles would have mentioned it in the scriptures.”

In fact, we know that St. Paul preached in the temple for 3 months. Clearly, everything he preached could not have been contained in the written word. Would that we could hear and absorb everything that he preached!

(Oh, but Catholics can! His teachings have been preserved in Sacred Tradition as well!)
 
I only skimmed this thread so I apologize if someone has brought this up, but Matthew is clear that Mary did not remain a virgin.

“But he had no union with her as her husband until she had borne her firstborn Son; and he called His name Jesus.” Matthew 1:25

How would Matthew know Mary didn’t remain a virgin? He most likely encountered Jesus’ bothers and sisters that are mentioned in other parts of the Gospels.

I am not Catholic so I don’t understand the importance to the Catholic denomination of Mary’s perpetual virginity, but if it were so important to the Christian religion as a whole, you would think the apostles would have mentioned it in the scriptures.
Luther calls out those who interpret Matthew 1:25 in this way, as well as responds to those who claim that scripture refers to Jesus having blood brothers and sisters.
When Matthew [1:25] says that Joseph did not know Mary carnally until she had brought forth her son, it does not follow that he knew her subsequently; on the contrary, it means that he never did know her . . . This babble . . . is without justification . . .** he has neither noticed nor paid any attention to either Scripture or the common idiom**.
and
I am inclined to agree with those who declare that ‘brothers’ really mean ‘cousins’ here, for Holy Writ and the Jews always call cousins brothers.
Jon
 

There is nothing in Scripture that states, “If it’s so important the apostles would have mentioned it in the scriptures.”
If “sola scriptura” were so important the apostles would have discussed it at length in the scriptures…

If doctrines like the “trinity” or “hypostasis” were so important the apostles would have mentioned them explicitly in the scriptures…

(We could go on and on).
 
If “sola scriptura” were so important the apostles would have discussed it at length in the scriptures…

If doctrines like the “trinity” or “hypostasis” were so important the apostles would have mentioned them explicitly in the scriptures…
'zactly.
(We could go on and on).
I’ll add one more, just for fun: if Hebrews had been so important to include in the canon, you would think that the apostles would have mentioned, “And the Epistle to the Hebrews is indeed the inspired Word of God!”
 
Wow … and which passages in the Bible describe this normal appearance of the family?

I seemed to have missed the one where all the kids were sitting round the table and Mary was trying to get them to sit still and eat while discussing whose turn it was to do the dishes.

Or the story about how the kids were out in the yard playing tag or was it hide and seek?

Maybe it was the wedding feast at Cana … no … Mary is the only family member noted as being present, no Joseph, no siblings … and then the events of that day were not “normal” …

Gosh - not sure how I missed all the stories about the ‘normal’ family in the bible :confused:
I only mentioned life before his ministry. Jesus separated his ministry as not being a "family " thing. of course nothing is “normal” about His ministry, although there were many false messiahs before him, and to many he was just another one…Yes, you missed the deatils of there family life being normal like playing tag ,just as i missed them being “abnormal” as in being above or better than other families. Both are not in there, except where I mentioned (plus one I forgot, Simeon’s blessing/ prophecy was unique at his circumcision/cleansing,t hough it may have been common to prophecy over the dedication of a child, but certainly no one ever uttered such words as Simeon). Tell me , when Jesus began his ministry, what did people who knew him and his family say ? Is there any indication that He came from an an extra holy devout family ?
 
If your criterion is “direct evidence”, can you give “direct evidence” that the Apostles preached the Trinity?
Yes, all the scriptural evidence used by St Basil and others to define it, defend it,scripture written by apostles or their immediate co-worker.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top