I
IGotQuestions
Guest
What is the history of the expression “personal Lord and Savior”?
So while I will agree with your statements in general but not sure it applies to all non-Catholics, the only thing I would like to say is that for me as a Catholic experiencing Jesus in the Most Holy Eucharist is experiencing Him to the furthest extent as Personal Lord and Savior.I’m not 100% sure, however, my GUESS is that the word “personal” was added by Sola Scriptura protestants to emphasise personal relationship vs communal relationship.
Catholics typically say “Our Lord and Savior” vs “My…”
That’s not to imply that that Catholics do not believe that Jesus Christ is our personal Lord and Savior, but Catholics believe that we are supposed to help others get to Heaven too. Jesus died for all of our sins, not just mine. We are all part of the Body of Christ and hence we are all connected.
So in conclusion: while the phrase “Personal Lord and Savior” is theologically fine for Catholics, I believe it was created to emphasise the Protestant belief that you don’t need the Church, just simply accept Jesus as your personal Lord and Savior and you can be saved.
I pray this helps.
God Bless!
Yes! One cannot get any more personal than receiving the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ!So while I will agree with your statements in general but not sure it applies to all non-Catholics, the only thing I would like to say is that for me as a Catholic experiencing Jesus in the Most Holy Eucharist is experiencing Him to the furthest extent as Personal Lord and Savior.
True!May we grow to appreciate this awesome gift to the maximum.
Great explanation. I like the concept of this being a personal decision. When I was growing up we were told that all we had to do was go to church and confession and we’d be okay. What a lie. What emptiness!As an evangelical who uses the expression “Personal Lord and Savior” myself, it means that God has chosen to be in close and personal relationship with His children through the Lord Jesus Christ and his sacrifice on the cross for our sins.He is not too distant to care and love us individually as well as communally. I’ve heard priests and Catholic commentators on EWTN comment that many Catholics have been sacramentalized but not evangelized. We all need to be evangelized, not just some. In that way, it becomes personal but at the same time we are to help one another get to heaven.
In the end, we all have to make an individual decision to follow Him or not. We can’t drag someone else into heaven with is. We can and should invite them to follow the Lord with us and we should model the Christian faith for them as best we can, but we cannot force them to do it. In that respect, it is a personal decision and choice that each individual must make on their own in the end.
While you don’t need the Church to accept Jesus as Lord and Savior (you can do that in a coffee shop, at home, in your car, on a retreat, or anywhere else if it is divinely appointed), each of us should go to church and not forsake the gathering together with other believers as stated in Holy Scripture and to receive teaching from those in authority who know and teach the Word of God, like our pastors.
Hebrews 10:24-25
…and let us consider how to stimulate one another to love and good deeds, 25not forsaking our own assembling together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another; and all the more as you see the day drawing near
Yes! One cannot get any more personal than receiving the Body, Blood, Soul and Divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ!
May we grow to appreciate this awesome gift to the maximum.
In general, what you are saying here (except what I highlighted in red) is consistent with the Catholic Church. However, to Catholics, accepting Jesus but not going to Church can be compared loving your parents / grandparents but sending them off to a retirement home without ever visiting.As an evangelical who uses the expression “Personal Lord and Savior” myself, it means that God has chosen to be in close and personal relationship with His children through the Lord Jesus Christ and his sacrifice on the cross for our sins.He is not too distant to care and love us individually as well as communally. I’ve heard priests and Catholic commentators on EWTN comment that many Catholics have been sacramentalized but not evangelized. We all need to be evangelized, not just some. In that way, it becomes personal but at the same time we are to help one another get to heaven.
In the end, we all have to make an individual decision to follow Him or not. We can’t drag someone else into heaven with is. We can and should invite them to follow the Lord with us and we should model the Christian faith for them as best we can, but we cannot force them to do it. In that respect, it is a personal decision and choice that each individual must make on their own in the end.
***While you don’t need the Church to accept Jesus as Lord and Savior (you can do that in a coffee shop, at home, in your car, on a retreat, or anywhere else if it is divinely appointed), *** each of us should go to church and not forsake the gathering together with other believers as stated in Holy Scripture and to receive teaching from those in authority who know and teach the Word of God, like our pastors.
Hebrews 10:24-25
…and let us consider how to stimulate one another to love and good deeds, 25not forsaking our own assembling together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another; and all the more as you see the day drawing near
Agreed, which goes to the point of why did Christ establish His Church if it was not necessary to go to Church.In general, what you are saying here (except what I highlighted in red) is consistent with the Catholic Church. However, to Catholics, accepting Jesus but not going to Church can be compared loving your parents / grandparents but sending them off to a retirement home without ever visiting.
Anyway, may The Lord bring us all wisdom and peace during this Christmastide Season.
God Bless and have a Holy Christmas and a Blessed New Year!
While I agree that attending church is important to growing in Christ and for helping others grow in Christ, and while I also believe it is foolish and immature for any person to think he/she can live a strong Christian life without the help of the Church, I stand by my point that you highlighted in red in your previous post. (post #10).In general, what you are saying here (except what I highlighted in red) is consistent with the Catholic Church. However, to Catholics, accepting Jesus but not going to Church can be compared loving your parents / grandparents but sending them off to a retirement home without ever visiting.
Anyway, may The Lord bring us all wisdom and peace during this Christmastide Season.
God Bless and have a Holy Christmas and a Blessed New Year!
This phrase came out of the American Fundamentalist movemement. It was a reaction against the nominal christianity of mainline evangelicals.What is the history of the expression “personal Lord and Savior”?
I have to disagree with your statement that Protestants belief that they don’t need the Church in their personal walk with Jesus. We each have our personal relationship with Him but need to be fed spiritually within an ecclesiastical setting hearing and sharing the Word with one another as well as taking care of those in need. In the Lutheran setting we also need to be present in order to partake of the Real Presence thru Holy Communion.So in conclusion: while the phrase “Personal Lord and Savior” is theologically fine for Catholics, I believe it was created to emphasise the Protestant belief that you don’t need the Church, just simply accept Jesus as your personal Lord and Savior and you can be saved.
I pray this helps.
God Bless!
Yes, that was a broad brush statement to make that Protestants believe they don’t need the Church.I have to disagree with your statement that Protestants belief that they don’t need the Church in their personal walk with Jesus. We each have our personal relationship with Him but need to be fed spiritually within an ecclesiastical setting hearing and sharing the Word with one another as well as taking care of those in need. In the Lutheran setting we also need to be present in order to partake of the Real Presence thru Holy Communion.
God bless!
Rita
And to hear the word and receive Holy Absolution.I have to disagree with your statement that Protestants belief that they don’t need the Church in their personal walk with Jesus. We each have our personal relationship with Him but need to be fed spiritually within an ecclesiastical setting hearing and sharing the Word with one another as well as taking care of those in need. In the Lutheran setting we also need to be present in order to partake of the Real Presence thru Holy Communion.
God bless!
Rita
I don’t think it is a particularly large percentage. In fact, probably rather small.Yes, that was a broad brush statement to make that Protestants believe they don’t need the Church.
However, there are some who appear to reject hierarchy and assembling together, at least weekly.
Perhaps it is a choice of their own making and not of the denomination to which they belong?
And to hear the word and receive Holy Absolution.
Jon