"personal relationship" with God

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sword_of_Fire
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I must admit I have been struggling with how we need to interact with another person aka priests for all the sacraments.

How does one have a personal relationship with God if one needs to ask forgiveness through another person?

It’s not really personal then is it?
Because that is how Jesus established His Church…he established Holy Orders at the Last Supper.

The Sacrament of Confession…John 20:21-23…pretty significant that the only other time in Scripture where Jesus breathes on man is Genesis 2:7.

Also the apostles were not mind readers it’s pretty clear that if they were to forgive sins they had to hear one’s confession.
 
Some basics:
Christ is the second person of the Trinity.

If you don’t have a personal relationship with Christ with all that entails, then you don’t know Christ.
We are called to know God, love God, serve God. All those things involve the whole person in relationship with God. These things are not merely observances, they are a coming to know a person.
Having a personal relationship with Christ is not exclusive of the community of saints, rather…the more we have a personal relationship with Christ, the more we are united to the community of saints.

More than anything else, I think people object to the phraseology, not the idea.
Personal does not mean exclusive or merely individual. We become more fully who we are as we become part of the Community of Saints.
 
Because that is how Jesus established His Church…he established Holy Orders at the Last Supper.

The Sacrament of Confession…John 20:21-23…pretty significant that the only other time in Scripture where Jesus breathes on man is Genesis 2:7.

Also the apostles were not mind readers it’s pretty clear that if they were to forgive sins they had to hear one’s confession.
Do priests forgive sins or does Jesus?
 
Do priests forgive sins or does Jesus?
1441 Only God forgives sins.Since he is the Son of God, Jesus says of himself, “The Son of man has authority on earth to forgive sins” and exercises this divine power: "Your sins are forgiven."Further, by virtue of his divine authority he gives this power to men to exercise in his name.
1461 Since Christ entrusted to his apostles the ministry of reconciliation, bishops who are their successors, and priests, the bishops’ collaborators, continue to exercise this ministry. Indeed bishops and priests, by virtue of the sacrament of Holy Orders, have the power to forgive all sins “in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit.”
You should read the whole section…

vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/p2s2c2a4.htm
 
Sorry; what point are you trying to make please?

The expression “personal relationship with God” is one other churches use and that was my point, Clearly no one has quite grasped that!

It really is so very very simple.
It is well known that personal relationship with God is used in other than the Catholic Church.

The point of my post is that we are called to a personal relationship, and combined with the prior post I made, that is through prayer.
 
It seems as though in modern times, many who call themselves Catholic are into asking whether or not one has a “personal relationship with Jesus”. This is particularly big with those who buy into “charismatic renewal”. It seems as though, in an attempt to unify with protestantism, these folks think they are going to “ween people away” from what they consider archaic about Holy Mother Church. Perhaps they don’t believe in the teaching authority of the Church and that the Church as the visible Body of Christ is not necessary. Thoughts?
I actually was puzzled by this “personal relationship with Jesus” in my past Catholic life before I returned to the Church. I had always had a more “natural faith” rather than a “supernatural faith”. I was sincerely puzzled as to if God truly loved me personally. I had a very difficult childhood all the way up into my 30s. It was hard to understand how God would love me and yet all these things happened.

It wasn’t until I came back to the Church in my mid-forties (just 4 years ago) and made my Confession to re-enter the Church. That night I cried for about 2 or 3 hours, a weeping that touched me to the core, it was a kind of weeping that was unknown to me (and believe me, I’ve shed a lot of tears in my life). It was that night, after my Confession, that I truly knew, truly understood, that God did indeed know me, He did indeed love me. Truly as a Father, as a Friend, as a Savior. I was weeping in a type of mourning I guess. I was so touched in my heart that I had doubted the Lord’s love for me, this unrequited, infinite love for all my 40+ years, and yet, He still came to me, took my hand and rose me from the dead.

I have no idea what happened, the Confession was not as complete as it should have been (unintentionally), the priest was lovely but didn’t really say anything to me that hadn’t been said to me before, but yet…something happened.

Whenever I hear “personal relationship with Jesus”, I now know what that means. Jesus is alive and well and genuinely interested in you and me and what’s going on around us.
 
I saw a good example of this while waiting for the Vegas debate. A LOT of people were milling around waiting. A lot of them carried signs that read :“all you need is Jesus, not church”.
 
I saw a good example of this while waiting for the Vegas debate. A LOT of people were milling around waiting. A lot of them carried signs that read :“all you need is Jesus, not church”.
I don’t think that’s the kind of “personal” we are talking about. That’s more a caricature of the real thing.
Some people don’t know what personal means. It is conflated with individualist in an exclusive sense.
A personal relationship with Christ is a unifiying relationship. I hope everyone knows the difference.
 
I don’t think that’s the kind of “personal” we are talking about. That’s more a caricature of the real thing.
Some people don’t know what personal means. It is conflated with individualist in an exclusive sense.
A personal relationship with Christ is a unifiying relationship. I hope everyone knows the difference.
The sense in which the protestants use it has that elitist sense to it. Of course they don’t think that man needs any intermediaries which makes them protestants.
 
I also have seen this trend of some Catholics (don’t know if they are charismatics) who buy into the protestant notion of a ‘personal relationship’ with Jesus. I hear statements such as ‘we need to bring people to Jesus before we bring them into the Church’. It implies a separation of Jesus from His Church. A relationship with Jesus without His Church turns into finding one’s own personal Jesus… in effect protestantism. Very convenient for dissenters who say ‘well I don’t agree with this church teaching or that church teaching’.

I have also heard faithful Catholics derisively labeled ‘pray, pay and obey’ Catholics by the same. All three things btw we are commanded to do in Scripture.

Cardinal Dolan had a great talk about this at the Napa conference where he talked about how we can not have a relationship with Jesus without His Church. A funny line he said was ‘these people want Jesus as their Shepherd as long as they are the only lamb’

Pope Francis…
Very well said. That is the Catholic approach. It’s saddening when you see catholics adopting the same mentality.
 
it is hard for me to imagine having a more personal relationship with God than the relationship with God that i experience in the sacraments of Reconciliation and Holy Communion, daily prayer, self-denial and alms giving.

every time i practice any of the above i encounter almighty God, through His Only Son, in a way far more personal than any encounter i have with other human beings.

maybe that is not so for others who engage in the above practices, but i suspect that most of them also believe those practices provide the deepest of personal relationships imaginable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top