G
GandalfTheWhite
Guest
As far as I know the Church doesn’t make claims about who is not in heaven and thus would not say that Mother Teresa is not a saint (remember that ALL those in heaven are saints).I have problem with the entire process the church has regarding sainthood…what would happen for example if the church decided that Mother Teresa is not a saint and makes a declaration stating this as fact.
If a Church made such an infallible statement about Mother Teresa then yes. The thing is that the Church doesn’t make such claims.Would i , as a catholic , have to believe this is as an absolute truth?
No. Absolutely not. But you cannot be 100% sure…unlike with St. Padre Pio for example.My gran was a very humble and devout Catholic…do i need the churches permission to believe that she is in heaven.
The miracles are signs that God is working through that person. Of course the miracles are also clearly pointing to the existence of our Lord, which is however not the point of looking at these miracles during the canonization process. For example consider the miracles of incorruptibility or healing.Also why the necessity of ’ proving ’ miracles through a person before sainthood is granted? I personally see this as a lack of faith when we look for signs of a miracle.
Sure, but we also believe that God works especially through the most holy people - sometimes even to the extend that their holiness is almost materially evident. Their bodies do not decay and smell of e.g. roses, they heal unhealable, they get visions etc.To my mind miracles are happening around me everyday…like when a baby is born or a person with cancer is prayed for , and is suddenly healed.
Why would we? If these are honest questions then you deserve honest answers so you may be led to the foulness of truth.Or have i missed the boat here…please do not shoot me down with your responses ; the church must be able to stand up to scrutiny and challenges from it’s members !![]()
In Christ!
~G