Peter (a Jew), Cornelius (a Gentile), and the Precedent of Revealed Doctrine

  • Thread starter Thread starter ParkerD
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
P

ParkerD

Guest
If a Bible student re-reads Acts 10, they will note that an angel told Cornelius to go to Peter to know “what thou oughtest to do” since he was a “devout man”, though a Gentile.

Peter has a vision prior to Cornelius’ visit. It is a prophetic vision, a revelatory vision about the Gentiles’ acceptance in the eyes of God: “What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common.” (v. 15)

Peter and Cornelius finally meet, and Cornelius kneels because he misunderstands Peter’s role, and Peter corrects him:

25 And as Peter was coming in, Cornelius met him, and fell down at his feet, and worshipped him.
26 But Peter took him up, saying, Stand up; I myself also am a man.
27 And as he talked with him, he went in, and found many that were come together.
28 And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean.
29 Therefore came I unto you without gainsaying, as soon as I was sent for: I ask therefore for what intent ye have sent for me?
30 And Cornelius said, Four days ago I was fasting until this hour; and at the ninth hour I prayed in my house, and, behold, a man stood before me in bright clothing,
31 And said, Cornelius, thy prayer is heard, and thine alms are had in remembrance in the sight of God.
32 Send therefore to Joppa, and call hither Simon, whose surname is Peter; he is lodged in the house of one Simon a tanner by the sea side: who, when he cometh, shall speak unto thee.
33 Immediately therefore I sent to thee; and thou hast well done that thou art come. Now therefore are we all here present before God, to hear all things that are commanded thee of God.
34 ¶ Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
35 But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him.

Peter soon realizes that this assembly of Gentiles has had the Holy Ghost poured out on them, and realizes that they need to be baptized, so he says:

47 Can any man forbid water, that these should not be baptized, which have received the Holy Ghost as well as we?
48 And he commanded them to be baptized in the name of the Lord.

This experience was very important in the primitive Church. Christ was (and still is) the leader of the Church, its living Head, but Peter was the one whom Christ had selected as the first apostle, and had had the vision with James and John which no other apostles had (Matthew 17:1-9). Peter received the doctrinal change that the gospel should now be freely given to the Gentiles. This was the pattern for revelation to guide the Church. Visions, ministry of angels, prophetic doctrine…important precedents and patterns to guide believers.
 
I don’t understand your question…:whacky::whacky::whacky:

What are you trying to say?:confused: It’s too complicated!
 
This experience was very important in the primitive Church. Christ was (and still is) the leader of the Church, its living Head, but Peter was the one whom Christ had selected as the first apostle, and had had the vision with James and John which no other apostles had (Matthew 17:1-9). Peter received the doctrinal change that the gospel should now be freely given to the Gentiles. This was the pattern for revelation to guide the Church. Visions, ministry of angels, prophetic doctrine…important precedents and patterns to guide believers.
The church today isn’t guided by visions etc.
 
This experience was very important in the primitive Church. Christ was (and still is) the leader of the Church, its living Head, but Peter was the one whom Christ had selected as the first apostle, and had had the vision with James and John which no other apostles had (Matthew 17:1-9). Peter received the doctrinal change that the gospel should now be freely given to the Gentiles. This was the pattern for revelation to guide the Church. Visions, ministry of angels, prophetic doctrine…important precedents and patterns to guide believers.
But it wasn’t a change “Go ye therefore, and teach **all nations, **baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” more of a forceful reiteration.
 
But it wasn’t a change “Go ye therefore, and teach **all nations, **baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost” more of a forceful reiteration.
Zaffiroborant,
That’s a very good point. I think Peter and the apostles needed a clear understanding about what that commission they had already received meant, hence as you say a “forceful reiteration.” I agree.
 
This experience was very important in the primitive Church. Christ was (and still is) the leader of the Church, its living Head, but Peter was the one whom Christ had selected as the first apostle, and had had the vision with James and John which no other apostles had (Matthew 17:1-9).

Gabriel of 12;
Your commentary has hit the nail on the head, that Jesus is still the head of his Church of whom he built upon Peter continued in his successors in the Bishop of Rome the Popes. Jesus Christ does not change, he remains steadfast in his Catholic Church 2000 years unchanged. New revelations ceased from the last apostle, that is why Paul himself teaches that not even “an angel from heaven can bring you a new gospel” if he does? “let him be accursed”. So new revelations ceased from the last living apostle.

Parker D;
Peter received the doctrinal change that the gospel should now be freely given to the Gentiles. This was the pattern for revelation to guide the Church. Visions, ministry of angels, prophetic doctrine…important precedents and patterns to guide believers.
Gabriel of 12;

Peter did not recieve a doctrinal change here, Peter recieved a revelation. Peter makes the welcome of Gentiles into the Kingdom of God doctrine, after the first council in Jerusalem in the book of Acts, when the belief came under attack. That is how most Catholic Apostolic Belief’s became doctrine or dogma when these Apostolic belief’s came under attack by anti-christ or heretics. So there was never a total apostasy in the Apostolic Catholic faith, only those who opposed the Apostolic Teachings handed down to their successors in the Catholic Bishops and Popes. Who went to their deaths defending this Catholic Faith we have today unchanged.
 
The people of God are still guided by dreams and visions.
I agree that these may guide us but if they purport to give new revelation which contradicts the Church and the Bible we can be sure they are not from God.
 
The people of God are still guided by dreams and visions.
Gabriel of 12;

Amen, the Catholic church firmly believes this from the approved Apparitions from the Saints. But if you research each Catholic Church approved Apparition of Mary, Angels and Jesus, the Gospel message never changes, it is revealed anew in every age and people, “Repent” “Pray” and believe the Gospel, this message does not change, nor do the Gospels of Jesus.

One good example is the Virgin de Guadalupe where Mary from her apparition converts millions of Aztec indians to the Gospels of Jesus. Now this is a vision from heaven, that sceintists even today’s technology are stumped and cannot disprove this heavenly apparition.

IF a vision changes the divine revelations of Jesus or adds to the message of Jesus, then it is considered from the Evil one the father of lies. There can not be another gospel, or another testament of Jesus, there is only One Lord Jesus Christ.

Ditto, Claire from DE
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top