R
reen12
Guest
Here’s what I don’t get.
We’re called to pray. I can see the purpose
for prayers of penitence, prayers lauding God’s glory,
but I don’t get prayers of petition.
As an example:
Someone is suffering physically.
We are urged to pray for this person.
Why? God knows everything. To Him,
all is an eternal “now.” Is He saying
that He won’t lift a finger to help,
unless He is asked? What kind of
“Father” is that? If He knows of each
sparrow that falls to the ground, how
is it that He requests to be importuned
to help a suffering human being?
Prayers of praise are evoked naturally.
To see the beauty in the world, and
how “wonderfully we are made.”
Prayers of repentence flow from a
heart that asks forgiveness.
But asking the Master of the Universe to
turn His attention to help a human being -
again, what father would have to be
importuned to help his suffering child?
When the “result” of a prayer is clear,
it’s either a yes or a no. I’ve seen
people turn themselves into pretzel shape,
trying to ‘explain’ why God didn’t “help.”
Then there seem to rush in those who
try to convince others that, in reality,
God did help, but it’s just not clear
to us why He seemed to say “no” to our prayer.
What kind of mind-bending non-sense is
this?
If God is Father, then ‘relationship’ should
be His specialty. And what of those who
lay suffering, with no human relation near?
Or no human relation, period. What of them?
This whole routine makes no sense to me.
If He is Father, then let Him* act* like a Father -
without the need for prompting from limited human beings.
I have to tell Him? Is He not there?
If the whole exercise is predicated on
“We have to accept God’s will,”
then what’s the purpose of petitionary
prayer to begin with? He’s going to do
what He’s going to do - with or without
our prayers of petition.
The entire “economy” of this eludes me.
It seems like a wretched charade.
reen12
We’re called to pray. I can see the purpose
for prayers of penitence, prayers lauding God’s glory,
but I don’t get prayers of petition.
As an example:
Someone is suffering physically.
We are urged to pray for this person.
Why? God knows everything. To Him,
all is an eternal “now.” Is He saying
that He won’t lift a finger to help,
unless He is asked? What kind of
“Father” is that? If He knows of each
sparrow that falls to the ground, how
is it that He requests to be importuned
to help a suffering human being?
Prayers of praise are evoked naturally.
To see the beauty in the world, and
how “wonderfully we are made.”
Prayers of repentence flow from a
heart that asks forgiveness.
But asking the Master of the Universe to
turn His attention to help a human being -
again, what father would have to be
importuned to help his suffering child?
When the “result” of a prayer is clear,
it’s either a yes or a no. I’ve seen
people turn themselves into pretzel shape,
trying to ‘explain’ why God didn’t “help.”
Then there seem to rush in those who
try to convince others that, in reality,
God did help, but it’s just not clear
to us why He seemed to say “no” to our prayer.
What kind of mind-bending non-sense is
this?
If God is Father, then ‘relationship’ should
be His specialty. And what of those who
lay suffering, with no human relation near?
Or no human relation, period. What of them?
This whole routine makes no sense to me.
If He is Father, then let Him* act* like a Father -
without the need for prompting from limited human beings.
I have to tell Him? Is He not there?
If the whole exercise is predicated on
“We have to accept God’s will,”
then what’s the purpose of petitionary
prayer to begin with? He’s going to do
what He’s going to do - with or without
our prayers of petition.
The entire “economy” of this eludes me.
It seems like a wretched charade.
reen12