Philadelphia archidiocese reaches out to abuse victims

  • Thread starter Thread starter meno
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

meno

Guest
Cardinal Rigali is taking interesting steps to reach out to sexual abuse victims, although one spokesman for victims understandably thinks it’s being stage-managed. Has anybody else heard of radio ads aimed at bringing out more victims or frank discussion posted on Church Web sites? I’m hoping this approach produces positive results, although there must be a certain risk that it will turn into a Springer episode.

philly.com/mld/philly/15512945.htm
 
Has anybody else heard of radio ads aimed at bringing out more victims or frank discussion posted on Church Web sites?
About a year ago my diocese did a weekend healing/discussion sort a thing for victims and their families. There was advertising to get the word out about the event. No media was allowed in…it wasn’t a J. Springer event.
 
Did they put it on the Web?
No but I think that web posting generic, anonymous discussion questions and replies from the seminar is OK. I don’t imagine any harm from this. Posting some of what happened at the seminar might actually satisfiy the concerns of those who could not attend. Obviously not all who are concerned about the sex abuse scandals in your diocese were able to attend the seminar.
 
WYNNEWOOD, Pa. - Monsignor David Benz listened in anguish as a woman described how a parish priest sexually abused her two sons with the same hands he used to consecrate the body and blood of Christ. The woman’s tale came in a meeting called by Cardinal Justin Rigali, who summoned hundreds of Roman Catholic priests in the Philadelphia Archdiocese to hear from the victims of clergy sex abuse.

The victims offered sometimes graphic accounts of molestation and rape.

“It was like sticking a knife in my heart,” said Benz, 63, of St. Philomena church in Lansdowne.

Victoria Windsor Cubberly spoke of repeated abuse by more than one priest and the suicidal thoughts and nightmares she suffers as a result. The mother of the two abused children, identified only by the first name Grace, talked about the lingering trauma the abuse inflicted on her entire family.

“How did I not know? How did I not see it?” said Grace, who was not fully identified by the archdiocese. “I will carry these questions until I die.”

Some viewed the meeting as a small but hopeful step by the archdiocese to face its past.

Rigali, who convened the unusual forum at St. Charles Borromeo Seminary, said that although many priests have read newspaper accounts of clergy sex abuse, they need to listen to the stories as well.

“It is extremely important for us to hear their stories firsthand so that we may see the human face and hear the human voice,” he said.

About 330 priests and a handful of lay people gathered at the seminary, where victims spoke in a small auditorium just a few feet from the cardinal and his top aides. The priests were riveted by the speakers, who challenged Rigali to offer victims more help, including financial compensation.

Cubberly graphically described being raped as a girl by one priest in a rectory office. She later spoke of abuse suffered at the hands of two more clergymen.

“There are few people who want to hear my story — it’s just too hard to hear,” Cubberly said.

Grace described a priest who regularly visited her family’s house in what she said was a concerted effort to gain the trust of her and her husband. The priest — whom she later referred to as a “man from the devil” — then used that trust to abuse her children.

Grace also read a letter from her older son, now in prison, describing how he dreaded seeing the priest’s car pull up to their house. After taking the son to the priory and abusing him, the priest would bring him back home and have a drink at the kitchen table.

“It was like he was celebrating what he did to me,” the son said in the letter.

Abuse victim Edward Morris, 44, told the priests that the church has lost generations of followers because of the crimes committed by clergy.

The speakers said it was hard for them to report the abuse. “I wanted so badly to be the good little Catholic girl who was supposed to please the priests,” Cubberly said.

The 90-minute event was closed to the public, but video was streamed live on the archdiocese’s Web site. Afterward, the priests attended a prayer service at nearby St. Martin’s Chapel. Rigali did not answer questions.

A year ago, a Philadelphia grand jury accused church leaders of covering up decades of abuse by at least 63 priests. Lawyers for the archdiocese attacked the report, calling it “a vile, mean-spirited diatribe.”

The Rev. Steve Katziner of St. Ephrem church in Bensalem said after the forum that he knew one of the priests accused by Cubberly, and that what she described was “horrible and devastating.”
 
On Friday, Cardinal Justin Rigali, archbishop of the Diocese of Philadelphia, called some 300 priests and a handful of lay people to St. Charles Borromeo Seminary to hear, firsthand, graphic accounts of molestation and rape at the hands of the Catholic clergy.

Dubbed “Witness to Sorrow,” the session was billed as an opportunity for priests to listen to sexual-abuse victims and confront the horror that has festered in the church for years.

“It is extremely important for us to hear their stories firsthand so that we may see the human face and hear the human voice,” Rigali said.

On Monday, the cardinal sent his lawyers to federal court in Philadelphia, where they asked a judge to dismiss a class-action lawsuit filed by 14 people who claimed they were abused by priests as children.

The archdiocese, it turns out, wants to hear the human voices of the victims - just not in a courtroom.

It’s the latest twist in a tale of deceit and hypocrisy that sickens self-respecting Catholics and continues to besmirch the names and deeds of innocent priests and nuns who just want to practice their vocations.

A three-year grand jury investigation by the Philadelphia District Attorney’s office has graphically documented decades of sexual abuse in the archdiocese. It named 63 priests who allegedly abused children as far back as the 1950s. Forty-three of those priests had connections with Delaware County at some point. Its findings mirror those from dioceses across the nation and, indeed, from across the world.

The archdiocese responded by attacking the grand jury’s work and accusing the prosecutors of anti-Catholic bias. But it didn’t stick. The church’s history of covering up abuse claims, of transferring the transgressors, and intimidating the victims and their families, is now beyond question.

But in Pennsylvania, none of those priests could be prosecuted because the statute of limitation for the crime had run out.

Previous attempts to hold the church liable in civil court have failed when judges cited that fact.

The lawsuit filed in U.S. District Court in Philadelphia tried a new tack. It charged the archdiocese with civil rights violations and racketeering, of engaging in a criminal conspiracy to evade responsibility for the actions of its agents.

As a legal theory, it seems to have merit. At the very least, it’s worth putting before a jury. But that’s the last thing Cardinal Rigali and his legal team wants to happen.

Whatever the judge decides, it’s clear that the archdiocese’s major concern is all about money. It will do whatever it has to in order to evade the civil judgments that it so richly deserves to pay to the victims.

That’s why it is urgent that the state Legislature change the law to allow those who permitted this horror to be held accountable.

The Philadelphia grand jury recommended that the state abolish the statute of limitations and amend the law so it would allow unincorporated associations such as the archdiocese to be held to the same standard as corporations for crimes concerning the sexual abuse of children.

Several bills have been introduced to address the problem. One would open a one-year “window” in which victims of sexual abuse would be allowed to file a civil lawsuit no matter how old the accusations are.

That measure deserves enactment. The cardinal and his dream team of attorneys should see the faces and hear the voices of the victims of the church’s monstrous negligence. But not in a seminary.

They should hear the victims in a courtroom - the only venue that can belatedly deliver a small measure of justice and, mercifully, begin to assuage their pain.
 
I assume you are quoting news articles in these passages, but I’m having trouble telling what is your opinion and what is somebody else’s.

Could you please do me a favor and provide links when you reference published materials? It allows me to see the source, and the people who hold the copyrights on the articles appreciate it. Using the little quote button at the top of the window helps, too.

Thanks.
 
Meno My post was the Editorial, DelcoTimes.com 09/19/2006 ©DelcoTimes 2006 , One thing Meno i have yet to find any one who has not been sexualy abused ,Can under stand the deep emotional trauma abuse has on us the victims ,yours michael ps after seeing interveiws from some of the leader of the church ,they showed as much emotion as a lump of wood
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top