Uh, Zackonattack, this was in reference to a resolution passed by the Philedelphia City Council declaring that city to be a “Pro-Choice City”. Those are their words. They labeled themselves.The “city” of Philadelphia is not prochoice or prolife. You can’t label a whole city as one way or another. There are individuals on both sides. Furthermore I don’t like the term “pro choice” since it means nothing. I mean, I’m pro choice alright!! I choose what I wear, what I drive, what chuch to go to etc. Let’s call a spade a spade. There is the Pro Life side (me) and the Pro Death side, the side that sees nothing wrong with murdering the unborn. People say the population is aging. Duh!!! Mothers have killed at least 45,000,000 of their babies since 1973 Roe V Wade. Just think of all the young kids they would have produced.
Abortion is nothing more than the modern-day version of child sacrifice. The mothers don’t throw them into the fire anymore, they just consent to have their brains sucked out, chopped to pieces and disgarded, which is just as bad. The most dangerous place for a unborn baby is in his mother’s womb. I wonder when people will wake up to how sick that really is. Women need to stop babbling about the “right to my body,” or “reproductive rights,” or any of the other babble they engage in to justify getting rid of their baby. (and, by the way, MEN have equal rights and have a moral right to insist that their child not be murdered).
A few councilmembers can’t speak for the entire city. It’s like editorials in the newspaper. They say, well the Post recommends a vote for blah, blah. What they really means is that the editor and at the most, 10 other managers recommend such and such. The other 98 per cent of the people that work for that newspaper may totally disagree. So it would be more honest to say we, the 10 members of the editorial board, speaking ONLY for ourselves, recommend you vote for so and so. Define the terms I always say.Uh, Zackonattack, this was in reference to a resolution passed by the Philedelphia City Council declaring that city to be a “Pro-Choice City”. Those are their words. They labeled themselves.
The resolution was repealed a few days later because of many outcries, such as what we saw on this thread.
As for everything else you said, I pretty much agree.
I am sorry to burst your bubble, but it was only 5 people who made the murder of babies legal in this country to begin with. Secondly, city council members, like all elected officials are elected for the purpose of speaking for others. Making it legal does not make it right. There are plenty of people out there doing evil and calling it good.A few councilmembers can’t speak for the entire city. It’s like editorials in the newspaper. They say, well the Post recommends a vote for blah, blah. What they really means is that the editor and at the most, 10 other managers recommend such and such. The other 98 per cent of the people that work for that newspaper may totally disagree. So it would be more honest to say we, the 10 members of the editorial board, speaking ONLY for ourselves, recommend you vote for so and so. Define the terms I always say.