C
Charlemagne_II
Guest
Should there be a course offered in high schools concerning the Philosophy of Science?
Such a course could concern itself with the basic principles of scientific research. Issues not normally covered in a biology or physics courses could be covered in this course; in particular things like the origin of the universe, the origin of life, the origins of science, and issues that have been controversial down through the centuries into modern times. The pros and cons of such issues would need to be laid out, with alternative explanations offered and evaluated as to whether they pass muster as rational positions. There could also be analysis of historical developments in science and their impact on the philosophers and theologians. Textbooks for such courses would have to be carefully edited so as not give the impression of being agenda driven. For example, if using opposing essays on a given controversy, the editors must not select the weakest argument for one side while selecting the strongest argument for the other side.
The reason I suggest this topic is that it seems to me much agenda driven teaching in science is tearing our culture apart at the seams. The public generally, and parents and children specifically, want to be assured that students are not being used as pawns for agenda driven creationism on the one hand, or atheistic scientism on the other.
Such a course could concern itself with the basic principles of scientific research. Issues not normally covered in a biology or physics courses could be covered in this course; in particular things like the origin of the universe, the origin of life, the origins of science, and issues that have been controversial down through the centuries into modern times. The pros and cons of such issues would need to be laid out, with alternative explanations offered and evaluated as to whether they pass muster as rational positions. There could also be analysis of historical developments in science and their impact on the philosophers and theologians. Textbooks for such courses would have to be carefully edited so as not give the impression of being agenda driven. For example, if using opposing essays on a given controversy, the editors must not select the weakest argument for one side while selecting the strongest argument for the other side.
The reason I suggest this topic is that it seems to me much agenda driven teaching in science is tearing our culture apart at the seams. The public generally, and parents and children specifically, want to be assured that students are not being used as pawns for agenda driven creationism on the one hand, or atheistic scientism on the other.