A
Ani_Ibi
Guest
![40.png](https://forums.catholic-questions.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/e79b87/40.png)
I think I might be in a position to be persuaded in that direction. Wanna start a new thread and persuade me?Am I the only person who thinks that Aquinas and the ST are overrated?
![40.png](https://forums.catholic-questions.org/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/a/e79b87/40.png)
- Plato’s Symposium
![Grinning face with big eyes :smiley: 😃](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f603.png)
I think I might be in a position to be persuaded in that direction. Wanna start a new thread and persuade me?Am I the only person who thinks that Aquinas and the ST are overrated?
- Plato’s Symposium
Comments are fine.I think I might be in a position to be persuaded in that direction. Wanna start a new thread and persuade me?
I have to hide now because cp said only two books and I have been commenting willy nilly.
I’d also be interested in a thread on this subject.I think I might be in a position to be persuaded in that direction. Wanna start a new thread and persuade me?
Me too. Count me in the pro-Thomas corner.I’d also be interested in a thread on this subject.
:knight2:Well, well. Okay, so I’m going to go off now and spray on a whole canister of AquinasDefender, with its secret TerrificThomistic ingredient. (Patent pending.)
Just be prepared.
It’s started as of now.:knight2:Who is going to start the thread?
At first I thought he was a bit too pessimistic. Now, after a few years, I think he was simply being realistic; I’d consider it one of the best philosophical works of the past three decades or so.I’m reading After Virtue right now. I’m about 4/5ths of the way through it. What do you think of it?
I HOPE you are the only one. Its only the most brilliant document ever composed with out the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.Am I the only person who thinks that Aquinas and the ST are overrated?
I hereby proclaim myself IN CHARGE and that means you have to obey THIS RULE: No long lists of books; you have to stick with TWO.
Here’s the question: (1) What is your single favorite work of philosophy by the actual philosopher (primary source, in other words); (2) What is your favorite secondary-source philosophical work (derived from or commenting upon an original philosopher)?
An example: Mine would be (1) Aquinas’s Summa Theologica; (2) Peter Kreeft’s “Christianity for Modern Pagans.”
Any others?
I think we’ll change the rules again: How about any two books related to philosophy at all? This seems more accommodating.Neither one is a secondary source. My apologies.
I like this rule change. Trying to pick a “favorite” philosophic text is like being offered a Sophie’s Choice. Two commentaries that have read a lot are Stanley Rosen’s marvelous Nihilism: A Philosophic Essay and Leo Strauss’ Natural Right and History.I read the latter as an undergraduate and the former in grad school. I have returned to both many times and have never failed to get new insights from each of them. It is fair to say that both have deeply influenced my thinking and my career.I think we’ll change the rules again: How about any two books related to philosophy at all? This seems more accommodating.
I woulden’t go that far, Aquinas was truely a genius, however there is no, objective, quantative measure by which you can defend your claim here.I HOPE you are the only one. Its only the most brilliant document ever composed with out the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.