Physical existance of Heaven and Hell?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Christine85
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Don’t mean to be rude but some of you seem to be so sure that hell isn’t a place. Let me remind you theologians and philosophers have been debating such things for hundreds of years. All we know is that heaven and hell are real whether they are physical or not. We cannot fathom what is beyond our imagination. Just because its more rational to believe that hell isn’t a real place, it doesn’t mean it isn’t.
 
Read the part about hell.No mention of the people burning in an eternal fire.So still confused.If thats the case why would some people have visions of hell where creatures are shown to be burning and of fire
The visions we know of hell are symbolic. The weeping and gnashing of teeth come from the seeing of the city and not being able to enter it, though it seems simple that goes into deep and terrible ways. Even in John Boscos vision of hell we see that those who suffer can see heaven. The fire is symbolic but completely accurate. The visions of repetitive sins, burning, tearing of the flesh are accurate symbols for mankind who could not otherwise understand.

There is more, and I will quote F. Amorth directly here. In one of his exorcisms a demon said this “Down there everyone lives folded within themselves and torn apart by his regrets” ( In my nobody opinion this is what is symbolized by fire, repetitive sins, and tearing of the flesh)

Further from F. Amorth, and I mention it to edify that our God is merciful in spite of the existence of hell.

“It wasn’t he(God) who made hell, It was us. He had not even thought about it” When asked if they contributed to the creation of hell. “All of us cooperated”.

I do not say any of these things of my own accord. I only quote the chief exorcist of Rome.
 
To edify the above I will say that many things exist concurrently at different periods of time. Science has even proven it.

Two atomic clocks were synchronized. One was placed on earth, One was placed in a jet traveling very fast. When the plane landed the two clocks were not the same.

Time travels differently depending on your speed. Perhaps in our case the “pieces” that compose us are not traveling at the same speed. At the very least none of us are bound by the same clock. It’s all a very strange world we live in.

Science has even postulated sending messages into the past or future using particles that move through time due to their speed. Anyway time, whatever it is, is not our clocks.
 
To edify the above I will say that many things exist concurrently at different periods of time. Science has even proven it.

Two atomic clocks were synchronized. One was placed on earth, One was placed in a jet traveling very fast. When the plane landed the two clocks were not the same.

Time travels differently depending on your speed. Perhaps in our case the “pieces” that compose us are not traveling at the same speed. At the very least none of us are bound by the same clock. It’s all a very strange world we live in.

Science has even postulated sending messages into the past or future using particles that move through time due to their speed. Anyway time, whatever it is, is not our clocks.
Indeed! It is very quirky to contemplate NOW and TIME - NOW is an ‘infinitely small’ passage of time, ergo sum it should be deemed as not existent that being the case.

Given the infinitely small nature of NOW it should take an 'infinite number of them to traverse any denomination of TIME, from say a millisecond to an ‘era’, so why then do these passages of TIME appear to be so different? Could it be that when physical and temporal time meets the ‘infinite’ and eternal, whether micro or macro the ‘meeting point’ will appear paradoxical? Here I am reminded that infinity can be used in theoretical mathematics, but can’t be used in applied/physical and temporal/real life/ maths.

A top Victorian mathematician by the name of Georg Cantor literally drove himself into depression and the ‘nut house’ trying to ‘tame’ infinity.
www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georg_Cantor
 
I made a boo boo. That second post, about time, was meant for another thread where we are discussing God and time. I cued it up for deletion but it seems to be taking awhile.

Sorry for the randomness, but it’s worth it to hear about cantor which was unknown to me. I think De Carte went crazy over it too iirc or something similar at least.
 
Hi I am very confused, I had heard a Priest once say that the Church does not actually believe in the physical reality of Hell, I guess that goes for Heaven too, and I raised the question in Mariology yesterday when I said if Jesus ascended to Heaven and Mary was Assumed into Heaven then it must be a physical reality, but that I had heard that Catholics don’t believe in the physical reality of Hell so I had assumed that is the same for Heaven. I heard that Catholics believe it is more so a state of being???
I looked in the Catechism and this type of thing was not explained. Does anyone know the Church teaching on this or is there not one? A girl in the class was outraged at my opinion and she said it is a physical reality and pointed me to some writings by a Father on the Dogma on Heaven and Hell. I thought it was a Protestant view to believe that there is actually a place where people go and burn that is I dunno say in the middle of the earth or whatever, I come to recall actually that even in RCIA we were taught it is not a physical reality… ugh confused…maybe I will just ask my spiritual director
I started a thread about this same subject yesterday, then later stumbled on your thread. I’ve heard the same thing, that Heaven is a “state of being.” What does that even mean?
 
I started a thread about this same subject yesterday, then later stumbled on your thread. I’ve heard the same thing, that Heaven is a “state of being.” What does that even mean?
A new kind of life (life = “being” for human beings).

Heaven is not a “place” of the sort you can walk your everyday body to, or reach by transportation. To experience it, you need a “new being” (new body, pneumatikon soma; and new life).

ICXC NIKA
 
Our resurrected bodies will be glorified bodies, like the glorified body of Christ. Jesus Christ has a glorified physical body and he resides in Heaven. So will our glorified physical bodies. The glorified physical body will have shed all its dependence on its earthly limitations, it will not be subject to earthly physical laws. It will be able to exist in Heaven eventhough Heaven is not a place but a state. Linus2nd
A state of…what? What does that mean? Don’t physicists think the universe has many dimensions? Is heaven in another dimension or… what?
 
Here’s what Pope John Paul II said, now, if someone can please translate this, it would be much appreciated,

freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2571185/posts?page=23

<<<< Is heaven a place? In the General Audience of 21 July 1999, Pope John Paul II stated that heaven “is neither an abstraction nor a physical place in the clouds, but a living, personal relationship with the Holy Trinity.”

In this statement, as (almost) always, the great Holy Father was in perfect accord with St. Thomas Aquinas – “Incorporeal things are not in place after a manner known and familiar to us, in which way we say that bodies are properly in place; but they are in place after a manner befitting spiritual substances, a manner that cannot be fully manifest to us”.

What John Paul II wished to stress, and what is especially important to consider today, is that heaven is not to be understood in terrestrial terms.

Heaven is primarily a state of being and is certainly not a ‘place’ in the worldly sense of the term. Nevertheless, we come to a difficulty when we ask:

Where did Mary’s (and Christ’s) body go?

The simplest answer is: Heaven! But then we wonder: If heaven isn’t a place in the ordinary sense of the word, how could there be real human bodies present there? >>>>
 
The whole article is here:

<<<< The Assumption is not a metaphor…

We must be very clear on this point: The Assumption is not a metaphor. The Blessed Virgin Mary was really taken up, her physical body was transformed. Pope Pius XII in Munificentissimus Deus (1950) declared that Mary, “after the completion of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul into the glory of heaven.” Both BODY and SOUL!

This means that her physical body was transformed and glorified (in a manner identical to Christ’s after his Resurrection), her soul was perfected with the Beatific Vision, and she was taken up.

Is heaven a place? In the General Audience of 21 July 1999, Pope John Paul II stated that heaven “is neither an abstraction nor a physical place in the clouds, but a living, personal relationship with the Holy Trinity.”

In this statement, as (almost) always, the great Holy Father was in perfect accord with St. Thomas Aquinas – “Incorporeal things are not in place after a manner known and familiar to us, in which way we say that bodies are properly in place; but they are in place after a manner befitting spiritual substances, a manner that cannot be fully manifest to us”.

What John Paul II wished to stress, and what is especially important to consider today, is that heaven is not to be understood in terrestrial terms.

Heaven is primarily a state of being and is certainly not a ‘place’ in the worldly sense of the term. Nevertheless, we come to a difficulty when we ask:

Where did Mary’s (and Christ’s) body go?

The simplest answer is: Heaven! But then we wonder: If heaven isn’t a place in the ordinary sense of the word, how could there be real human bodies present there?

The words of Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange (who taught John Paul II and oversaw his doctoral work) are most helpful: “Heaven means this place, and especially this condition, of supreme beatitude. Had God created no bodies, but only pure spirits, heaven would not need to be a place; it would signify merely the state of the angels who rejoice in the possession of God.

But in fact heaven is also a place. There we find the humanity of Jesus, the Blessed Virgin Mary, the angels, and the souls of the saints. Though we cannot say with certitude where this place is to be found, or what its relation is to the whole universe, revelation does not allow us to doubt of its existence.”

Now do not think that John Paul II had contradicted his teacher when he said that heaven is not a physical place in the clouds! Garrigou-Lagrange and the great Pontiff are both getting at the same point: Heaven is first and foremost union with God; secondarily, heaven is the place where the bodies of Jesus and Mary abide, but this ‘place’ is not like every other place we think of – its relation to our universe is not clear.

Glorified bodies are very different than non-glorified bodies (though they are essentially the same). A glorified body does not move and take up space in exactly the same way as a non-glorified body does. Still, the glorified bodies of Jesus and Mary are somewhere, but this ‘somewhere’ will necessarily be a ‘place’ which is ‘glorified’ – just as the glorified body is different from non-glorified body, it resides in a ‘glorified place’ which is different from a non-glorified physical place.

Where is heaven? The simple answer is: This has not yet been revealed to us. However, we can say that it is certainly not on earth. Neither is it within the earth. It is not in clouds either. Heaven may be somewhere in our universe, far off – though we must be careful not to fall back into our terrestrial categories of space, distance, and location.

Perhaps it is most likely that heaven is outside the universe in what some Thomists have called “uncontained place”. In ST III, q.57, a.4, ad 2 (which is not in the oldest and best manuscripts) we read: “A place implies the notion of containing; hence the first container has the formality of first place, and such is the first heaven. Therefore, bodies need themselves to be in a place, insofar as they are contained by a heavenly body. But glorified bodies, Christ’s especially, do not stand in need of being so contained, because they draw nothing from the heavenly bodies, but from God through the soul.

So there is nothing to prevent Christ’s body from being beyond the containing radius of the heavenly bodies, and not in a containing place. Nor is there need for a vacuum to exist outside heaven, since there is no place there, nor is there any potentiality susceptive of a body, but the potentiality of reaching thither lies in Christ.”

This argument from the Summa claims that, because the glorified body in no way relies upon the non-glorified world, neither does it need to be contained in the universe. Thus, the bodies of Jesus and Mary may in fact be outside of the universe, outside of space and time, no longer contained by place. There is no space or place outside of the universe, but this is where the bodies of Christ and Mary are; since they need not be contained by physical place.

Therefore, it seems most likely that heaven is outside of our universe. It is not a ‘place’ as we usually think of ‘place’, but is a ‘non-containing place’, a ‘glorified place’. The glorified physical bodies of Jesus and Mary reside there. >>>>

Can SOMEBODY please take a stab at putting the location of heaven and hell into words? Suggestions, please?
 
A state of…what? What does that mean? Don’t physicists think the universe has many dimensions? Is heaven in another dimension or… what?
Read my response in the other thread 🙂

There are, or will be, somas moving around; therefore something comparable to place.

ICXC NIKA
 
Read my response in the other thread 🙂

There are, or will be, somas moving around; therefore something comparable to place.

ICXC NIKA
I still don’t understand the last part of your reply. Are you trying to say that heaven and hell would likely be in some other dimension?
 
I still don’t understand the last part of your reply. Are you trying to say that heaven and hell would likely be in some other dimension?
Yes, they are ‘other’ than the 11 or so physical and temporal dimensionality of this universe.

“My Kingdom is not of this world”,
Said Jesus - neither is Satan’s abode. Liken earthly Humanity to a 'battleground, though.
 
My understanding is that heaven and hell are not physical right now, by our perspective of time, but when the new heaven and earth are made and the resurection of the dead occurs, they will be physical.

That’s how Fr. José Fortea explains it, at least. I have to expect he knows what he’s talking about.
 
My understanding is that heaven and hell are not physical right now, by our perspective of time, but when the new heaven and earth are made and the resurection of the dead occurs, they will be physical.

That’s how Fr. José Fortea explains it, at least. I have to expect he knows what he’s talking about.
Can you please link me up to his article or video or whatever?
 
Can you please link me up to his article or video or whatever?
It’s from his book Interview with an Exorcist. I’ll share the part where he mentions this:
Heaven, hell, and purgatory exist now only as states of being. At the resurrection at the Last Judgement, the souls of the dead will be reunited with their bodies and will then exist in a concrete place (see CCC 650, 1005). At that point, the blessed will occupy a “physical heaven” (that is, a physical place of everlasting happiness), and the condemned will occupy a “physical hell.” As Revelation 21:1 states, “Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth.”
—Fr. José Fortea
 
It’s from his book Interview with an Exorcist. I’ll share the part where he mentions this:

—Fr. José Fortea
Thanks for your reply. I thought we were getting somewhere; it explains what happens and will happen to us, but then the question still remains… where Did Jesus and Mary’s glorified bodies go?

Also, what does it mean when they say heaven is “a state of being?”
 
Hi I am very confused, I had heard a Priest once say that the Church does not actually believe in the physical reality of Hell, I guess that goes for Heaven too, and I raised the question in Mariology yesterday when I said if Jesus ascended to Heaven and Mary was Assumed into Heaven then it must be a physical reality, but that I had heard that Catholics don’t believe in the physical reality of Hell so I had assumed that is the same for Heaven. I heard that Catholics believe it is more so a state of being???
I looked in the Catechism and this type of thing was not explained. Does anyone know the Church teaching on this or is there not one? A girl in the class was outraged at my opinion and she said it is a physical reality and pointed me to some writings by a Father on the Dogma on Heaven and Hell. I thought it was a Protestant view to believe that there is actually a place where people go and burn that is I dunno say in the middle of the earth or whatever, I come to recall actually that even in RCIA we were taught it is not a physical reality… ugh confused…maybe I will just ask my spiritual director
I think that if physical teeth can be gnashed, then it’s a good possibility something physical must be causing the anguish.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top