Physical Proof of the Resurrection

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mannyfit75
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Mannyfit75

Guest
Jesus’ resurrection is not found only in Scripture but we have a physical proof it did happened. The Shroud of Turin bares the mark of a crucified man, with crown of thorns on his head, a pierce side, wipe markings of a Roman valgram, nail marks on the wrists, and feet.

The image of the Shroud has burn marks that had been cause by intense radiation due to the flash of light. This account is founded in Scripture where Jesus was buried, and the Roman soldiers witness a bright light in the tomb.

I am convince that the Shroud of Turin is Jesus. No other man have been tortured in a way. The only reference that we see in the Shroud is the same description of the crucifed Jesus.

I believe the Shroud is the real deal.
 
I think it is, too–but even if it isn’t that wouldn’t shake my belief in the resurrection at all!
 
Mannyfit75 said:
The image of the Shroud has burn marks that had been cause by intense radiation due to the flash of light. This account is founded in Scripture where Jesus was buried, and the Roman soldiers witness a bright light in the tomb.
Click to expand...
Visible light isn’t radioactive.
 
Mannyfit75 said:
Jesus’ resurrection is not found only in Scripture but we have a physical proof it did happened. The Shroud of Turin bares the mark of a crucified man, with crown of thorns on his head, a pierce side, wipe markings of a Roman valgram, nail marks on the wrists, and feet.

The image of the Shroud has burn marks that had been cause by intense radiation due to the flash of light. This account is founded in Scripture where Jesus was buried, and the Roman soldiers witness a bright light in the tomb.

I am convince that the Shroud of Turin is Jesus. No other man have been tortured in a way. The only reference that we see in the Shroud is the same description of the crucifed Jesus.

I believe the Shroud is the real deal.
Click to expand...
We are free to believe or not in the Shroud but you certainly cannot say it is proof because nothing has been proven yet about the Shroud other than it had pollens which are found in the Holy Land. Its age has also not been proven yet.
The best that could ever be proven would be that it is a cloth from about 2000 years ago. It can never be proven to be Christ’s burial cloth. That is something a person believes or not but can never be proven.
 
thistle said:
We are free to believe or not in the Shroud but you certainly cannot say it is proof because nothing has been proven yet about the Shroud other than it had pollens which are found in the Holy Land. Its age has also not been proven yet.
The best that could ever be proven would be that it is a cloth from about 2000 years ago. It can never be proven to be Christ’s burial cloth. That is something a person believes or not but can never be proven.
Click to expand...
It is proof enough. I have watch documentary concerning the evidence of the burial cloth. Second, the Carbon dating done of the burial has been invalided by the scientists community because the piece of the cloth that was carbon dated was a resewed fabric. It has been proven to be the burial cloth of Jesus.

If you done your thorough study of the Shroud of Turin you would noticed something special about it. Second, in the earliest image of Jesus, on the painting by early Christians, he was breadless, or clean shaven.

After one of the prigrims saw the Shroud, the images of Jesus in the Christian icon had a full bread. According to scientific research. The pollen grains that is contain in the cloth dates to the 1st Century during the realm of King Herod and Pontius Pilate.

The second is many of the scientists do not know how the image appeared in the cloth. They could not even reproduced the image. One scientist a suggest that the image was a product of the resurrection. It form an event horizon similiar to that of a black hole.

The image was produce as the body levitated off the tomb, and burst into a blinding light. The light was not hot enough to burn the cloth, but it produce marking like those of a burn cloth. However, the burn marks were produced at a subatomic level. This technology was not available at the time it was made, nor do we have the current technology to copy it.

I highly recommend you watch the evidence that the Burial Cloth of the Shroud of Turin is the real deal. It is the burial cloth of Jesus Christ.

I recommend the following documentary:

amazon.com/Fabric-Time-Shroud-Turin/dp/B000MTEFNM/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-4903500-9955914?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1186333637&sr=8-1 -Fabric of Time: Shroud of Turin

amazon.com/Jesus-the-Shroud-of-Turin/dp/B0000CBXYP/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-4903500-9955914?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1186333769&sr=1-1 -Jesus and the Shroud of Turin

These videos will open your eyes. The Shroud of Turin also prove that Jesus existed and that he is Real…Other than the accounts of the Gospels and the testimony of the Church. This Shroud proves that Jesus is God.
 
Mannyfit75 said:
It is proof enough. I have watch documentary concerning the evidence of the burial cloth. Second, the Carbon dating done of the burial has been invalided by the scientists community because the piece of the cloth that was carbon dated was a resewed fabric. It has been proven to be the burial cloth of Jesus.

If you done your thorough study of the Shroud of Turin you would noticed something special about it. Second, in the earliest image of Jesus, on the painting by early Christians, he was breadless, or clean shaven.

After one of the prigrims saw the Shroud, the images of Jesus in the Christian icon had a full bread. According to scientific research. The pollen grains that is contain in the cloth dates to the 1st Century during the realm of King Herod and Pontius Pilate.

The second is many of the scientists do not know how the image appeared in the cloth. They could not even reproduced the image. One scientist a suggest that the image was a product of the resurrection. It form an event horizon similiar to that of a black hole.

The image was produce as the body levitated off the tomb, and burst into a blinding light. The light was not hot enough to burn the cloth, but it produce marking like those of a burn cloth. However, the burn marks were produced at a subatomic level. This technology was not available at the time it was made, nor do we have the current technology to copy it.

I highly recommend you watch the evidence that the Burial Cloth of the Shroud of Turin is the real deal. It is the burial cloth of Jesus Christ.

I recommend the following documentary:

amazon.com/Fabric-Time-Shroud-Turin/dp/B000MTEFNM/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-4903500-9955914?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1186333637&sr=8-1 -Fabric of Time: Shroud of Turin

amazon.com/Jesus-the-Shroud-of-Turin/dp/B0000CBXYP/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1/104-4903500-9955914?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1186333769&sr=1-1 -Jesus and the Shroud of Turin

These videos will open your eyes. The Shroud of Turin also prove that Jesus existed and that he is Real…Other than the accounts of the Gospels and the testimony of the Church. This Shroud proves that Jesus is God.
Click to expand...
You haven’t read my posts on this in other threads or you would see that I tend to believe it is genuine. I am simply saying it can NEVER be proven to be the burial cloth of Christ. The best that can ever be proven is that it is a cloth from the Holy land and is 2000 years old but even if that were proven ( and it is not yet) that in itself does not prove it is Christ’s burial cloth. You can never prove that. It all comes down to believing it is or is not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top