Piercings - out of line?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tbrightson
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
As adults, their husbands will be, or ought to be, in charge. Men and women are equal in and of themselves but the husband has a higher position in the family and ultimately he is the head of the family. This is not just a cultural thing that can rightly change from time to time and from place to place, it is a moral law. The wife must both respect and obey her husband but the husband is only bound to respect his wife.
I think it’s important to teach both our daughters and sons early that this is not true. Their marriage vows will not include any mention of obedience, They are called to mutual submission – only the minor children of the couple are bound to obedience.
 
As adults, their husbands will be, or ought to be, in charge. Men and women are equal in and of themselves but the husband has a higher position in the family and ultimately he is the head of the family. This is not just a cultural thing that can rightly change from time to time and from place to place, it is a moral law. The wife must both respect and obey her husband but the husband is only bound to respect his wife.
The problem with this is how many Christian husbands falsely look at Christian leadership as having its analogy in the way those who are of the world look at authority, and not as Christ looked at authority. Even though people marveled at Our Lord’s authority in every respect, both his command over the natural and supernatural worlds and his total certainty to make flat and unassailable declarations on matters of Torah, Our Lord poured himself out, always leading in submission to the Father and as the servant of those given to him.

This is what the Apostles were taught about Christian leadership and the guardianship of children. Note that his Apostles already knew Him well enough to close their mouths when asked about their argument about who was the most important. Note also that he particularly selected the Twelve, those he would give the greatest authority in his Church, as the objects of this lesson:

*They came to Capernaum and, once inside the house, he began to ask them, “What were you arguing about on the way?” But they remained silent. They had been discussing among themselves on the way who was the greatest.

Then he sat down, called the Twelve, and said to them, “If anyone wishes to be first, he shall be the last of all and the servant of all.” Taking a child he placed it in their midst, and putting his arms around it he said to them, “Whoever receives one child such as this in my name, receives me; and whoever receives me, receives not me but the one who sent me.”
Mark 9:33-38*

If a Christian rules as a tyrant, whether as a husband, a wife, an in-law with money, or as a parent or teacher, he or she is not leading according to the Gospel. The Gospel of John notes that this lesson was reiterated at the Last Supper. It is of the utmost importance.

The problem now is the number of Christian households in which spouses fight over their personal piece of the world’s kind of power. That is not a Christian model of authority.
 
I think it’s important to teach both our daughters and sons early that this is not true. Their marriage vows will not include any mention of obedience, They are called to mutual submission – only the minor children of the couple are bound to obedience.
Whether it is in a monastery or a family or even a diocese, the obedience required is not personal obedience shown to the one in authority. Rather, the one in authority leads all in obedience to the ways of God, to whom obedience is ultimately due. This is why the commandment to honor our parents comes right after the commandments outlining our duties to God. Showing obedience to those in authority is an extension of obedience to God, but those in authority have a duty to ask for obedience that is ultimately obedience to God. They are humble servants in this equation, stewards of authority not their own, not demi-gods.
 
40.png
recentrevert:
As adults, their husbands will be, or ought to be, in charge. Men and women are equal in and of themselves but the husband has a higher position in the family and ultimately he is the head of the family. This is not just a cultural thing that can rightly change from time to time and from place to place, it is a moral law. The wife must both respect and obey her husband but the husband is only bound to respect his wife.
I think it’s important to teach both our daughters and sons early that this is not true. Their marriage vows will not include any mention of obedience, They are called to mutual submission – only the minor children of the couple are bound to obedience.

Ditto.
 
I am most concerned with the phrase, “The wife must both respect and obey her husband but the husband is only bound to respect his wife.”

That is like saying the wife must obey her husband as the Lord but the husband is “only” bound to love his wife as Christ loved the Church.

The more authority you have, the more you are a servant. This is the example of Christ.
 
Easterjoy may be correct in that the deeper issue is simply that it is a manipulative tactic which has worked for her before. Just as we train our kids by finding things that elicit appropriate behavior, children train parents by finding things that elicit the desired response from the parent. Some kids are confrontational, love to argue, and are very good at pulling parents into arguments that aren’t productive for example- and allow the child to avoid doing whatever it is the parent needs.

A huge problem in giving in to a toddler’s screaming and crying is-- you just demonstrated you have a breaking point. To them quite often, the next time isn’t a matter of if you’ll give in, it is when. They just need to continue the screaming/crying a bit longer. The more often they achieve their desired results using a specific tactic, the harder it will be to break them of it.

Upside of electronics is that it gives you a lot of information about what your kids, and their friends are up to. If you’re tech savvy- websites visited, how long, texts sent and received, links to social media sites, what their friends are posting…even their current location since they all have GPS and there are current location apps which report where the phone is in real time. Wondering if they really went where they said they’d be- easy to verify.
[/quote]
 
Easterjoy may be correct in that the deeper issue is simply that it is a manipulative tactic which has worked for her before. Just as we train our kids by finding things that elicit appropriate behavior, children train parents by finding things that elicit the desired response from the parent. Some kids are confrontational, love to argue, and are very good at pulling parents into arguments that aren’t productive for example- and allow the child to avoid doing whatever it is the parent needs.

A huge problem in giving in to a toddler’s screaming and crying is-- you just demonstrated you have a breaking point. To them quite often, the next time isn’t a matter of if you’ll give in, it is when. They just need to continue the screaming/crying a bit longer. The more often they achieve their desired results using a specific tactic, the harder it will be to break them of it.

Upside of electronics is that it gives you a lot of information about what your kids, and their friends are up to. If you’re tech savvy- websites visited, how long, texts sent and received, links to social media sites, what their friends are posting…even their current location since they all have GPS and there are current location apps which report where the phone is in real time. Wondering if they really went where they said they’d be- easy to verify.
Right. Is what this girl is doing a bit on the extreme side? Yes, but that doesn’t to me automatically signal that she has to be disturbed - just that she knows what can disturb her parents.

My oldest is four and I have been astonished at the things he has come up with to try and pressure me to give in to him. If I don’t, he might try again two or three more times but he gives up after that. But any emotional reaction from me is an encouragement to continue the behavior.
 
Well,

Had the talk with he wife, She said she didnt realize I was so strenously opposed…anyway I made it clear I am opposed to any more piercings and no tattos, she had the same opinion, also said we have to be on the same page. We will see how it goes.

Meanwhile the 12 yr old had another episode, nasty F-bombs during her particpation in an orgainzed activity. She doesnt like the activity nor the director, saying “They can all F’n go die in a hole” Wife put her up against the wall right then and there, but she remained defiant all the way home and into the evening. Needless to say the iphone has been confiscated. If she remains recalcitrant well there will then be no more cheerleading, the activity she really loves…
 
Well,

Had the talk with he wife, She said she didnt realize I was so strenously opposed…anyway I made it clear I am opposed to any more piercings and no tattos, she had the same opinion, also said we have to be on the same page. We will see how it goes.

Meanwhile the 12 yr old had another episode, nasty F-bombs during her particpation in an orgainzed activity. She doesnt like the activity nor the director, saying “They can all F’n go die in a hole” Wife put her up against the wall right then and there, but she remained defiant all the way home and into the evening. Needless to say the iphone has been confiscated. If she remains recalcitrant well there will then be no more cheerleading, the activity she really loves…
Tbrightson, I’ll be praying for your family. Stay strong and don’t let the opinions of a 12 year old get you down. I had a very confrontational daughter, even screamed at me in front of her friend once that she hated me, I had simply pointed out she had not cleaned her room as her mother had asked and then told her to do. I just looked at her and told her I couldn’t control how she felt about things, but she would do as she was told. If you stick to your guns, are consistent, are on the same page with the wife, and reward as well as punish— you do get through this, it does get better.

Daughter’s gotten through her 4 yr degree, and 2 year teacher credential program while living at home (without us killing each other) and is debt free. She is moving out the end of this month to her own apartment with her first full-time teaching contract at a public high school. Don’t know if it was because of my influence or despite it. You just do the best you can…
 
😦
Well,

Had the talk with he wife, She said she didnt realize I was so strenously opposed…anyway I made it clear I am opposed to any more piercings and no tattos, she had the same opinion, also said we have to be on the same page. We will see how it goes.

Meanwhile the 12 yr old had another episode, nasty F-bombs during her particpation in an orgainzed activity. She doesnt like the activity nor the director, saying “They can all F’n go die in a hole” Wife put her up against the wall right then and there, but she remained defiant all the way home and into the evening. Needless to say the iphone has been confiscated. If she remains recalcitrant well there will then be no more cheerleading, the activity she really loves…
She is the youngest and her sisters do not talk like that? You and your wife do not talk like that? (Be honest…not even when you are very angry, right?) If you use that kind of language, it is time to talk to your daughter and agree that it does not become either one of you and that you both need to stop together. Just as you can appreciate when hearing her how bad it is, she can imagine listening to you and realize that foul language doesn’t make any points with anybody. Some tolerate any kind of language, that is true, but no one really thinks more highly of those who talk like that.

I think that you may want to talk to her about the possibility that she may have picked up your temper. At any rate, ask her what she would think if you or her mother were to talk as she has been talking. Do respected people talk like that? Unfortunately, sometimes they do. (Never lie to your children–they are not stupid.) Do they lose respect when they lose their cool and use that kind of talk where they can be overheard? Yes, they do. It is the language that signals a loss of self-control. It is also a kind of language that easily routes its way through the part of the brain that blurts things out. (People familiar with stroke victims can tell you that language does have different routes, such that people might be able to speak clearly via the “blurt it out” route but can only speak jibberish through the route they control.)

Yes, it is reasonable to point out to her that she has to have control of her temper, her mouth, and her actions before she can have an i-Phone. The things you text are there forever. Someone can always find them. If you can’t think before you talk or act where someone can hear you and see you in person, you won’t think before you text or talk on a phone or when someone is capturing on video. If you don’t think before you text or talk on a phone, you are going to say something regrettable that you cannot banish from what can easily become the public record.

The new lesson of the 21st century is that everyone can hear you all of the time, can film you anywhere and everywhere, and can publish what you said and did in ways that you cannot control and can never get back. There has never been a time in history when those who lose their cool will be at a bigger disadvantage than they will be in our current technological climate. If your daughter has one outburst like she just had as an adult, she could ruin her career. It is good that you and your wife are on the same page on this one. Stick to your guns.

In the meantime, spend a lot of time with your daughters, but especially that 12 year old. Spend time in ways that you will both enjoy and spend time in which you learn about her particular gifts and view of the world. Draw out the best in her and openly appreciate the best in her. You and your wife need to have your “emotional bank account” full with your girls, but especially with that one.
 
😦

She is the youngest and her sisters do not talk like that? You and your wife do not talk like that? (Be honest…not even when you are very angry, right?) If you use that kind of language, it is time to talk to your daughter and agree that it does not become either one of you and that you both need to stop together. Just as you can appreciate when hearing her how bad it is, she can imagine listening to you and realize that foul language doesn’t make any points with anybody. Some tolerate any kind of language, that is true, but no one really thinks more highly of those who talk like that.

I think that you may want to talk to her about the possibility that she may have picked up your temper. At any rate, ask her what she would think if you or her mother were to talk as she has been talking. Do respected people talk like that? Unfortunately, sometimes they do. (Never lie to your children–they are not stupid.) Do they lose respect when they lose their cool and use that kind of talk where they can be overheard? Yes, they do. It is the language that signals a loss of self-control. It is also a kind of language that easily routes its way through the part of the brain that blurts things out. (People familiar with stroke victims can tell you that language does have different routes, such that people might be able to speak clearly via the “blurt it out” route but can only speak jibberish through the route they control.)

Yes, it is reasonable to point out to her that she has to have control of her temper, her mouth, and her actions before she can have an i-Phone. The things you text are there forever. Someone can always find them. If you can’t think before you talk or act where someone can hear you and see you in person, you won’t think before you text or talk on a phone or when someone is capturing on video. If you don’t think before you text or talk on a phone, you are going to say something regrettable that you cannot banish from what can easily become the public record.

The new lesson of the 21st century is that everyone can hear you all of the time, can film you anywhere and everywhere, and can publish what you said and did in ways that you cannot control and can never get back. There has never been a time in history when those who lose their cool will be at a bigger disadvantage than they will be in our current technological climate. If your daughter has one outburst like she just had as an adult, she could ruin her career. It is good that you and your wife are on the same page on this one. Stick to your guns.

In the meantime, spend a lot of time with your daughters, but especially that 12 year old. Spend time in ways that you will both enjoy and spend time in which you learn about her particular gifts and view of the world. Draw out the best in her and openly appreciate the best in her. You and your wife need to have your “emotional bank account” full with your girls, but especially with that one.
You make some very good points. I can swear at times, but its not a habitaul thing. Rarely the Fbomb. Wife swears even less…The other kids dont, at least not around us/in public. When we told her swearing is not acceptable, we didnt get the “well you do!” response one would expect if we did a lot of that. She will often get physical when mad, as with her sisters and even me once. Yep she needs to keep yourself under control.
 
“even screamed at me in front of her friend once that she hated me”

Yes she did that to me as well…as well as mocking me in front of her friends.
 
The problem with this is how many Christian husbands falsely look at Christian leadership as having its analogy in the way those who are of the world look at authority, and not as Christ looked at authority. Even though people marveled at Our Lord’s authority in every respect, both his command over the natural and supernatural worlds and his total certainty to make flat and unassailable declarations on matters of Torah, Our Lord poured himself out, always leading in submission to the Father and as the servant of those given to him.

This is what the Apostles were taught about Christian leadership and the guardianship of children. Note that his Apostles already knew Him well enough to close their mouths when asked about their argument about who was the most important. Note also that he particularly selected the Twelve, those he would give the greatest authority in his Church, as the objects of this lesson:

*They came to Capernaum and, once inside the house, he began to ask them, “What were you arguing about on the way?” But they remained silent. They had been discussing among themselves on the way who was the greatest.

Then he sat down, called the Twelve, and said to them, “If anyone wishes to be first, he shall be the last of all and the servant of all.” Taking a child he placed it in their midst, and putting his arms around it he said to them, “Whoever receives one child such as this in my name, receives me; and whoever receives me, receives not me but the one who sent me.”
Mark 9:33-38*

If a Christian rules as a tyrant, whether as a husband, a wife, an in-law with money, or as a parent or teacher, he or she is not leading according to the Gospel. The Gospel of John notes that this lesson was reiterated at the Last Supper. It is of the utmost importance.

The problem now is the number of Christian households in which spouses fight over their personal piece of the world’s kind of power. That is not a Christian model of authority.
What you say is true. The husband must use his authority for the benefit, particularly the spiritual benefit, of his family. Nevertheless, he does have authority and the wife sins if she disobeys him, unless his commands are genuinely harmful to herself or her children, or just beyond what he can reasonably expect from her. Just as the pope is there to serve us, and parents are there to serve their children, so the husband is the servant of his wife.
But nonetheless we must obey the pope, children must obey their parents, and wives must obey their husbands. The husband who goes against his wife’s wishes may sin against the love and respect he owes his wife, but the wife who disobeys her husband commits a sin of disobedience. The teaching of the Church is quite clear and it is absolutely undeniable that the husband is the head of the wife.
 
What you say is true. The husband must use his authority for the benefit, particularly the spiritual benefit, of his family. Nevertheless, he does have authority and the wife sins if she disobeys him, unless his commands are genuinely harmful to herself or her children, or just beyond what he can reasonably expect from her. Just as the pope is there to serve us, and parents are there to serve their children, so the husband is the servant of his wife.
But nonetheless we must obey the pope, children must obey their parents, and wives must obey their husbands. The husband who goes against his wife’s wishes may sin against the love and respect he owes his wife, but the wife who disobeys her husband commits a sin of disobedience. The teaching of the Church is quite clear and it is absolutely undeniable that the husband is the head of the wife.
Perhaps you could quote the appropriate Catechism paragraph on this point?
 
I think it’s important to teach both our daughters and sons early that this is not true. Their marriage vows will not include any mention of obedience, They are called to mutual submission – only the minor children of the couple are bound to obedience.
You believe this because the submission of the wife to the husband is a teaching of the Church you have not been exposed to. Please do not teach your children otherwise because you would be teaching them a dangerous, subversive and poisonous heresy. Read scripture and the doctors and fathers of the Church, read old catechisms and other works of instruction. This teaching is washed over in our time, partly because the husband so often abuses his authority but mainly because so many women simply will not accept it, either because they misunderstand it or because they have been infected by the spirit of the age. It is not necessary for the wife to take a vow of obedience to her husband to be bound to obey him - a Christian wife is bound to obey her husband because this is the moral law.

Look specifically at paragraph 11 if you are seeking the truth.

w2.vatican.va/content/leo-xiii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_l-xiii_enc_10021880_arcanum.html
 
Perhaps you could quote the appropriate Catechism paragraph on this point?
Ephesians 5:
22Let women be subject to their husbands, as to the Lord: 23Because the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ is the head of the church. He is the saviour of his body. 24Therefore as the church is subject to Christ, so also let the wives be to their husbands in all things. 25Husbands, love your wives, as Christ also loved the church, and delivered himself up for it: 26That he might sanctify it, cleansing it by the laver of water in the word of life: 27That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle, or any; such thing; but that it should be holy, and without blemish. 28So also ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife, loveth himself. 29For no man ever hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, as also Christ doth the church: 30Because we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones. 31For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife, and they shall be two in one flesh. 32This is a great sacrament; but I speak in Christ and in the church. 33Nevertheless let every one of you in particular love his wife as himself: and let the wife fear her husband.

1 Corinthians 11:3
But I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.
 
To the original poster:

Our Lord will hold you especially responsible if you do not do all you can to bring your family back to God. It is your strict duty to do all you can to give God their souls.

You must firstly use spiritual means; Prayer, particularly devotion to Our Lady and St. Joseph ‘Pillar of families’; Penance for your sins and those of you wife and children - this is very important to merit graces for all of you; Try to pray the rosary and get to daily Mass and adoration. Show your family that living in a state of grace is the most important matter and is far and above everything else; Show them that it is not enough to avoid mortal sin but that we must strive to do the right thing in all our decisions no matter how small. Make sure they know the faith well.

Then you must use natural means such as making continual sacrifices for them to show your love, pricking their consciences, removing them from the occasions of sin and worldliness and finding other things for them to do.
 
What you say is true. The husband must use his authority for the benefit, particularly the spiritual benefit, of his family. Nevertheless, he does have authority and the wife sins if she disobeys him, unless his commands are genuinely harmful to herself or her children, or just beyond what he can reasonably expect from her. Just as the pope is there to serve us, and parents are there to serve their children, so the husband is the servant of his wife.
But nonetheless we must obey the pope, children must obey their parents, and wives must obey their husbands. The husband who goes against his wife’s wishes may sin against the love and respect he owes his wife, but the wife who disobeys her husband commits a sin of disobedience. The teaching of the Church is quite clear and it is absolutely undeniable that the husband is the head of the wife.
Are you married? Because in all the years I’ve been reading threads on CAF and the more recent years I’ve been participating in them, I’ve found that almost all of the men who are this obsessed with “wifely obedience” are single. Either that or they are trolling. The married men who actively contribute to these threads on the subject are not fixated on the topic nor do they display an unhealthy interest in micromanaging each detail of “marital roles”. Perhaps it’s the fact the happily married men actually have real life experience in what a Sacramental Marriage involves on a daily basis and that does not include expecting or demanding child-like obedience from someone they share the marital bed with and instead of constantly harping on obedience they encourage striving towards better communication and working together as a team.

So, if you are married, please share with us exactly how your wife obeys you on a daily basis and how you expect obedience from her on a daily basis. We all know what the verses in Ephesians say and most of us have read certain Encyclical verses that you like to post- so let’s hear how this plays out for you in everyday life with your wife.
 
Ephesians 5:
22Let women be subject to their husbands, as to the Lord: 23Because the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ is the head of the church. He is the saviour of his body. 24Therefore as the church is subject to Christ, so also let the wives be to their husbands in all things. 25Husbands, love your wives, as Christ also loved the church, and delivered himself up for it: 26That he might sanctify it, cleansing it by the laver of water in the word of life: 27That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot or wrinkle, or any; such thing; but that it should be holy, and without blemish. 28So also ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife, loveth himself. 29For no man ever hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, as also Christ doth the church: 30Because we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones. 31For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife, and they shall be two in one flesh. 32This is a great sacrament; but I speak in Christ and in the church. 33Nevertheless let every one of you in particular love his wife as himself: and let the wife fear her husband.

1 Corinthians 11:3
But I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.
The Bible also tells us, among other things, that we shouldn’t wear clothes of certain fibers, have sex during a period or even within a week following, that we shouldn’t believe women who say they were raped unless several male witnesses saw the rape, and that women shouldn’t braid their hair. The Church interprets all these things for our times and places. Considering the vast attention to detail She gives to married life throughout the Catechism, one would think that something so basic as wifely submission would be discussed…and yet She doesn’t. End of subject.

I would vastly enjoy seeing someone go to, say, the predominantly African-American Catholic church in a city in which I lived for some time and tell the women there that wearing their hair in braids is immodest and sinful. giggles in an impish manner

If you wish to believe a fundamentalist protestant interpretation of that verse, you’re more than welcome to, but if the Church doesn’t interpret it that way, neither I nor any other practicing Catholic need do so, either.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top