Planned Parenthood Calls for Pro-Abortion Catholics to Oppose Bishops

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catholic_Press
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
IMO, using Sanger’s words re. abortion is a good tool in the fight against abortion.
sorry just…thinking out loud on this one…

so…abortion is targeted at what? poor people, single moms? the uneducated? so, how is abortion a tool against abortion? how can one abortion, stop another? i think it only does so if you have this line of thinking…

poor/single mom/etc person has baby, baby grows up, baby becomes poor/single mom/etc person, poor/single mom/etc person has baby, more poor/single mom/etc people …

enter abortion the ‘tool’…

poor/single mom/etc person aborts baby, baby never becomes poor/single mom/etc, no more…poor/single mom/etc people??? and therefore less abortions??? :eek:

who is she or anyone to say that this is the way it will be? that the baby of a poor person, or a single mother, or even a mother who doesnt want their child, will grow to have the same fate as their parents?
 
Washington D.C., Nov 4, 2009 / 03:44 pm (CNA).- Cecile Richards, President of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, sent an urgent message this week to the group’s base asking for pro-abortion Catholics to defy the U.S. bishops, who are campaigning against the current versions of health care legislation on Capitol Hill because they fund abortion.

More…
Of course!!

They are one of the many heads of the beast.

Instead of PPof A it should be PPofLucifer… or Lucis Trust - another on the list of fronts for the demonic activity in this country.
 
sorry just…thinking out loud on this one…

… so, how is abortion a tool against abortion?..
I think you misunderstood the words to which you were responding: IMO, using Sanger’s words re. abortion is a good tool in the fight against abortion.

“re” there means regarding, so what the poster was saying is that using Sanger’s words [about] abortion is a good tool… ie, that Sanger’s own words are a good tool in the fight against abortion.
 
the-american-catholic.com/2009/07/20/margaret-sanger-

The above is an article in The American Catholic titled “Margaret Sanger Was Against Abortion?”

She considered the abortions of thousands “a disgrace to civilization” and no matter “how early it was performed, it (abortion) was the taking of life.”
She started being an advocate for birth control because of the women she saw who had had abortions who died of septicemia–fairly common in those days before penicillin. However, she also thought that abc would be much better than it has turned out to be in practice, that it would be infallible in preventing conception.

She also wrote this: “The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.” Women and the New Race (Eugenics Publ. Co., 1920, 1923)

So it’s hard to tell how much against abortion (or infanticide) she really was.
 
This shows planned parenthood exactly for what it is. They are calling all heretics to oppose the Church. “The gates of hell shall not prevail”.
 
sorry just…thinking out loud on this one…

so…abortion is targeted at what? poor people, single moms? the uneducated? so, how is abortion a tool against abortion? how can one abortion, stop another? i think it only does so if you have this line of thinking…

poor/single mom/etc person has baby, baby grows up, baby becomes poor/single mom/etc person, poor/single mom/etc person has baby, more poor/single mom/etc people …

enter abortion the ‘tool’…

poor/single mom/etc person aborts baby, baby never becomes poor/single mom/etc, no more…poor/single mom/etc people??? and therefore less abortions??? :eek:

who is she or anyone to say that this is the way it will be? that the baby of a poor person, or a single mother, or even a mother who doesnt want their child, will grow to have the same fate as their parents?
Margaret Sanger, using and quoting her words, was against abortion. Yet, she is seen as the pioneer of abortion rights in this country. It is interesting that the founder of Planned Parenthood WAS NOT advocating abortion. But today, this agency is the primary source of abortions in this country.

If and when a person should insist that Sanger was for abortion, you have her quotes that she was not for abortion. And one can argue correctly that Sanger saw it as murder and as a destructive force within a society.

I think you got another meaning from what I wrote. Hope the above explains it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top