Planned Parenthood Reports Record Abortions, High Profits

  • Thread starter Thread starter under_the_dome
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
U

under_the_dome

Guest
Here’s the link.
During its 2005-2006 fiscal year, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America performed a record 264,943 abortions, attained a high profit of $55.8 million and received record taxpayer funding of $305.3 million.
According to its annual report, income is divided roughly into three major categories: clinic income (fees charged to customers at clinics); donations (gifts from corporations, foundations and individuals); and taxpayer money (grants and contracts from federal, state and local government).
For the year July 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006, Planned Parenthood received $345.1 million in clinic income, $305.3 million in taxpayer funding and $212.2 million in donations. Total income reached $902.8 million while total expenses came to $847.0 million, leaving a profit of $55.8 million.
“During a year of great change and growth, and in a political climate of increasing assaults on sexual and reproductive rights and health, Planned Parenthood continued to make enormous strides toward protecting and strengthening the reproductive health and rights of women and men worldwide,” the statement adds.
Ratio of abortions to adoptions
Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, noted that while the PPFA reported carrying out a record number of abortions in 2005-2006, it "did not record a single adoption referral."
In the previous year, PPFA reported 1,414 adoption referrals, which Sedlak said amounted to one adoption for every 180 abortions.
The fact that the organization chose not to release a number for adoptions in the latest fiscal year, he said, meant that “we can only assume the number was so low that Planned Parenthood didn’t want to embarrass itself by revealing it.”
"You will not find the word ‘adoption’ anywhere in the PPFA’s 2005-2006 Annual Report," Scott observed.
:signofcross: :gopray2: :crossrc: :byzsoc: :gopray2: :crossrc: :byzsoc: :signofcross:
 
Basically we have a death camp in every major city in America. And they call it “choice” As the report shows once you become pregnant the only choice they support is the choice to give them money to kill your child.
 
What’s worse, these are only the numbers for the United States. I can only imagine what they must be in Europe and Russia.
 
What’s worse, these are only the numbers for the United States. I can only imagine what they must be in Europe and Russia.
Don’t forget China, that great bastion of freedom, and India, where babies (inside and outside the womb) are exterminated for being female.
 
I heard a good story yesterday that will warm your hearts. I met a guy who said he and his wife can’t have children. His wife went to an OB/GYN that had just met with a young lady who was pregnant from a wild weekend of indescretion.

Seeing the problem of patient “A” and the problem of patient “B” he asked them independently if they wanted to help each other out. They both agreed and the OB/GYN referred them both to a collegue that happens to practice adoption law. Long story short, the OB/GYN lost two patients: one no longer needs fertility treatment and the other canceled an abortion. Oh well, maybe he will be of service when this baby girl grows up.

Apparently, this is something this Dr does on a regular basis.

Nohome
 
Long story short, the OB/GYN lost two patients: one no longer needs fertility treatment and the other canceled an abortion. Oh well, maybe he will be of service when this baby girl grows up.
Excuse me but how did an OB lose a patient who was pregnant? One of the things an OB does is care for women throughout their pregnancies so, this OB maybe just doesn’t do abortions and like you said, you heard he/she does this all the time.

My OB/GYN never did abortions. He no longer practices obstetrics and is not taking on new patients, just seeing us older women for our annual visits.

As for Planned Parenthood they are a despicable organization who exploits women! It doesn’t surprise me that they didn’t report any referrals for adoption, even if they had any figures they could be embarrassed by them:shrug:.

Every time I pass by the local PP clinic in my town I pray a Hail Mary for all those women who enter the clinic and for the clinic workers themselves who have been so deceived by the world and PP’s own propaganda. Thankfully the only PP clinic I know of that actually performs abortions is in the big city my little town is a suburb of so it makes it harder for our girls to get there (we also have very little mass transit) and there is a Birthright just around the corner from them!

Brenda V.
 
Has anyone ever read about the foundress of Planned Parenthood? Ironic it would be a woman destroying families and Catholic to boot. Margaret Sanger the devil did a number on you and left us with the mess.May God have mercy on your soul.
 
Your title says “Planned Parenthood Reports Record Abortions, High Profits” Are those True statements?
Despite a drop in donations and the first fall in income from clinics in its history, the nation’s biggest abortion provider made a high profit last year, thanks to the American taxpayer. Pro-lifers want this to stop.

During its 2005-2006 fiscal year, the nonprofit Planned Parenthood Federation of America performed a record 264,943 abortions, attained a high profit of $55.8 million and received record taxpayer funding of $305.3 million
 
Despite a drop in donations and the first fall in income from clinics in its history, the nation’s biggest abortion provider made a high profit last year, thanks to the American taxpayer. Pro-lifers want this to stop.

During its 2005-2006 fiscal year, the nonprofit Planned Parenthood Federation of America performed a record 264,943 abortions, attained a high profit of $55.8 million and received record taxpayer funding of $305.3 million
Sound fimilars it seems I have read this before? However I do not associate it with statements from PP can you site such a document?
I’m not quite sure I understand what you mean…
I am looking for Planned Parenthood’s “reports”
 
Sound fimilars it seems I have read this before? However I do not associate it with statements from PP can you site such a document?
I am looking for Planned Parenthood’s “reports”
Go to their website. What is it that bothers you about these statments? .
 
Go to their website. What is it that bothers you about these statments? .
I would much appreciate you documenting your post, this should not be much of a problem if the post is correct, however if the post is incorrect you may have a problem
 
I would much appreciate you documenting your post, this should not be much of a problem if the post is correct, however if the post is incorrect you may have a problem
Document what? I gave you a link to a news article -someone else gave you a link to another news article. You are much more intersted in parseing words on what the news article says than you are worrying about the aolughter that goes on in the abortuaries of this organizartion You have sucessfully hijacked two threads that were critical of PP-I suspect that was your intent all along.

Lets get back on subject-PP is a vile , racist orgainzation that exploits women , kills a quarter of a million children a year and works hard to elimnate those it considers inferiior-mainly poor black ,yellow or brown children.
 
I would much appreciate you documenting your post, this should not be much of a problem if the post is correct, however if the post is incorrect you may have a problem
I still can’t figure out what it is you are taking issue with… I saw the other thread that you hijacked in the Social Justice forum, and apparently you couldn’t be satisfied there, either.

Here is a link to the report as posted on the PP website, which was posted at the top of the Social Justice thread as well: plannedparenthood.org/files/PPFA/Annual_report.pdf
 
I still can’t figure out what it is you are taking issue with… I saw the other thread that you hijacked in the Social Justice forum, and apparently you couldn’t be satisfied there, either.

Here is a link to the report as posted on the PP website, which was posted at the top of the Social Justice thread as well: plannedparenthood.org/files/PPFA/Annual_report.pdf
Lets do this, I’ll assume you are a college student or younger. This based on the “under the dome”, I’ll pretend this is a piece of an assignment. I say to you “The title of your posting is Planned Parenthood Reports Record Abortions, High Profits is that accurate? Your source is Cybercast News Service and Family Research Council not Planned Parenthood. Am I missing a reference which shows these three are one in the same? I ask because poor documentation will certainly lower your grade, and it would make no sense for Planned Parenthood to write some of these quotes”

Here are some quotes I would ask you to directly reference from Planned Parenthood

*"………we can only assume the number was so low that Planned Parenthood didn’t want to embarrass itself by revealing it………"

‘……Planned Parenthood Federation of America performed a record 264,943 abortions, attained a high profit of $55.8 million….”

“…You will not find the word ‘adoption’ anywhere in the PPFA’s 2005-2006 Annual Report,…"*
 
Bob you may have the best intentions but your out of control on this issue
Basically we have a death camp in every major city in America. And they call it “choice” As the report shows once you become pregnant the only choice they support is the choice to give them money to kill your child.
I am going to assume this is an opinion, because their reports indicate over 90% of the patients do not receive abortions at Planned Parenthood
Despite a drop in donations and the first fall in income from clinics in its history, the nation’s biggest abortion provider made a high profit last year, thanks to the American taxpayer. Pro-lifers want this to stop.
During its 2005-2006 fiscal year, the nonprofit Planned Parenthood Federation of America performed a record 264,943 abortions, attained a high profit of $55.8 million and received record taxpayer funding of $305.3 million
Lets go back to college 101 here, this appears to be a direct quote from some one else? If it is a direct quote it needs a sited reference. If not a direct quote it is plagiarism from Planned Parenthood Reports Record Abortions, High Profits, By Randy Hall, CNSNews.com Staff Writer/Editor, June 15, 2007
Go to their website. What is it that bothers you about these statments? .
see the comments above, btw I do not believe this is in the inferred (Planned Parenthood) website.
Document what? I gave you a link to a news article -someone else gave you a link to another news article. You are much more intersted in parseing words on what the news article says than you are worrying about the aolughter that goes on in the abortuaries of this organizartion You have sucessfully hijacked two threads that were critical of PP-I suspect that was your intent all along.

Lets get back on subject-PP is a vile , racist orgainzation that exploits women , kills a quarter of a million children a year and works hard to elimnate those it considers inferiior-mainly poor black ,yellow or brown children.
A lot of accusations here why??? Bob I know for a fact many of those accusations are untrue. What about the rest of the accusations are they true or untrue? Let me restate my real message when discussing any issue, a Catholic should remain Catholic, there are no issues in which the Church gives license to rogue actions.
 
Lets go back to college 101 here, this appears to be a direct quote from some one else? If it is a direct quote it needs a sited reference. If not a direct quote it is plagiarism from Planned Parenthood Reports Record Abortions, High Profits, By Randy Hall, CNSNews.com Staff Writer/Editor, June 15, 2007
see the comments above, btw I do not believe this is in the inferred (Planned Parenthood) website.
Lol… this is all getting a bit ridiculous :rolleyes:

Aside from the very patronizing tone of your posts, I find it laughable that you would bandy about the accusation of plagiarism – a charge that is serious enough no real professor would dare to make it over a posting in an internet forum, of all things (meaning that you are standing in for, at best, an overzealous grad student). Moreover, any professor who repeatedly said that a particular reference would have to be “sited” and not “cited” should rightly be in danger of losing their job.

**FYI: it’s “cited” like “citation”, not “sited” like “website.” **

I’ll point this out one last time before I remove this thread from my subscriptions: the “quoted” paragraphs in my first post were clearly from the CNSNews article, which I linked to, and the genealogy of those remarks can be traced back to the .pdf that appears on the Planned Parenthood website, which I also linked to. If you’d like to try and make more hay over it, that’s fine with me, but the three of us (you, estesbob, and myself) are probably the only ones keeping up with this thread at this point, so I doubt there will be anyone around to read it.
 
What gets me about PP is the attempt to look sweet and helpful. Everybody on their website is smiling. Cute babies, etc. And they claim they do adoption referrals!

Actually, when you read closer, what they probably do is try to talk the woman into an abortion. If she resists and insists on asking for adoption help, they “refer” her to an adoption agency. In other words, they hand her a phone number of some local adoption agency! They don’t do the home study, the placement, the counseling, the classes, the legal paperwork, the court appearances… and yet they try to claim some moral high ground by including the word “adoption” to give people a warm fuzzy.:mad:
 
Lol… this is all getting a bit ridiculous :rolleyes:

Aside from the very patronizing tone of your posts, I find it laughable that you would bandy about the accusation of plagiarism – a charge that is serious enough no real professor would dare to make it over a posting in an internet forum, of all things (meaning that you are standing in for, at best, an overzealous grad student). Moreover, any professor who repeatedly said that a particular reference would have to be “sited” and not “cited” should rightly be in danger of losing their job.

**FYI: it’s “cited” like “citation”, not “sited” like “website.” **

I’ll point this out one last time before I remove this thread from my subscriptions: the “quoted” paragraphs in my first post were clearly from the CNSNews article, which I linked to, and the genealogy of those remarks can be traced back to the .pdf that appears on the Planned Parenthood website, which I also linked to. If you’d like to try and make more hay over it, that’s fine with me, but the three of us (you, estesbob, and myself) are probably the only ones keeping up with this thread at this point, so I doubt there will be anyone around to read it.
Thank you for the English clarification which is helpful. Sorry to have appeared patronizing that was certainly not intended. Ironically my attempts to not be harsh are failing so I’ll try being straight forward with you. The title of the thread is “Planned Parenthood Reports Record Abortions, High Profits

I find no facts that support Planned Parenthood Reports Record Abortions

I find no facts that support That Planned Parenthood Reports High Profits

I believe you read the post concerning the catechism on deceiving others, so I am asking again for the umpteenth time for a direct reference, citation, cite, or even a site to support the statement made in the title as correct. BTW I seriously doubt your accusation concerning professors would hold up if tested.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top