Plato and Aristotle

  • Thread starter Thread starter tiggylou
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

tiggylou

Guest
I am tying to understand the difference between Plato and Aristotle’s philosophy and how the difference impacted Christianity. I just dont seem to get what they believed and how they are different from each other.
I’ve done lots of reading on it…but I just need it explained in simple-terms.
Thanks
 
Plato believed the “Ideal Forms” were real and that this world is only a copy or “shadow” of the world of Forms. The highest Form is “The Good.”

Aristotle believed that these universal Forms existed, but that they were revealed to us in particular, embodied things here on earth.

For the first thousand years or so of Christianity, Plato was the more popular, since it appeared he was speaking of the greater reality of the spiritual world, with God / The Good as the highest reality.

However, Aristotle was eventually recovered by Christians (notably Thomas Aquinas), because Christians began to realize the importance of the physical world. After all, God Himself became a real human here in the real earth. Plato seemed too much of a “spiritualizing” influence, while Aristotle seemed to help Christians combine the realities of the spiritual and physical worlds simultaneously—as in the Eucharist, for example. This is why many Christians still use Aristotle’s distinction between “substance” and “accidents” to help explain Communion.

Hope this helps.
 
I read a very interesting (and good!) book recently - Anathem, by Neil Stephenson, dealing with a very Earthlike world, but with many subtleties inside-out and upside-down from ours, such as the academic classes being cloistered rather than the religious (instead of ‘Saints’ they have ‘Savants’, though in their modern usage they say ‘Saunt’, for one example). In fact, it IS our world, just cosmically another ‘version’ and very well expressed by the occasionally-odd language used - like the combination of ‘anathema’ and ‘anthem’ in the title.

It specifically, among many others, deals with the notion that Plato’s ideas (like, to be very simplistic, there could be one cosmos for us and another for ideal isosceles triangles…but in this work there are many more possibilities - one of the major characters is in fact from OUR version of Earth), could be physically REAL and the possible implications about the nature of consciousness.

Some parts of it actually read much like Eco’s The Name of the Rose, except oddly different, once again. I suggest trying it out - it’s fascinating, and there’s even a beautiful soundtrack on Stephenson’s site - a little like Gregorian chant, yet somehow not!.

Just a thought, since I can’t possibly make a forum post dealing with this in detail, although I might be able to get some specifics in there somewhere. :o
 
I really wish I could do more than sigh here. .I will, if I can (ie, it’s worth my time, but…yeh, sigh).
 
I am tying to understand the difference between Plato and Aristotle’s philosophy and how the difference impacted Christianity. I just dont seem to get what they believed and how they are different from each other.
I’ve done lots of reading on it…but I just need it explained in simple-terms.
Thanks
This is going to sound odd, but go to Google Image and look up “School of Athens”. Raphael really captures the difference of their philosophies in one simple image.
 
This is going to sound odd, but go to Google Image and look up “School of Athens”. Raphael really captures the difference of their philosophies in one simple image.
Thanks. I found it.

Blessings,
granny

All humans have immortal souls.
 
Hee yeah. He’s still the Godfather of Soul, y’all!

Yeah, I actually caught that pitch, cpayne! 😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top