Please forgive my complete ignorance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Michaeljc4
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Michaeljc4

Guest
…but I am pleading Proverbs 19:
He who gets wisdom loves his own soul; he who cherishes understanding prospers.

I don’t understand the difference between Coptic Christians, Coptic Catholics, and the Franciscans that are all mixed up together in Egypt right now. Can someone point me to an explanation? I find it all bewildering.

I am praying for all of them, of course.
 
Coptic Christians can be a generic reference to ALL Apostolic Christians (native non-protestant) of Egyptian ancestry. The Orthodox Copts are most in number. Catholic Copts are those of the Orthodox who reunited with Rome some time historically and became Eastern Catholic. Franciscans are a Latin-Rite Order within Egypt who have some missions for helping the poor, schools, etc. There are also some Eastern Catholic Copts working in the Franciscan Order.
 
…but I am pleading Proverbs 19:
He who gets wisdom loves his own soul; he who cherishes understanding prospers.

I don’t understand the difference between Coptic Christians, Coptic Catholics, and the Franciscans that are all mixed up together in Egypt right now. Can someone point me to an explanation? I find it all bewildering.

I am praying for all of them, of course.
Well I don’t know much about the Franciscans, but the Coptic Orthodox Church is actually not Christian, believe it or not. They deny that the Holy Spirit is God, I’m not too clear on their understanding of Jesus in relation to God, but nevertheless they deny the Trinity, thereby separating themselves from Christianity.
Someone Please
Correct Me If I’m
Wrong.
The Coptic Catholic Church, I believe, is an offshoot of the Orthodox Church that decided to enter into communion with the Roman Catholic Church, so they are Christian, just a different “rite” so I understand it? Coptic Rite?
 
Well I don’t know much about the Franciscans, but the Coptic Orthodox Church is actually not Christian, believe it or not. They deny that the Holy Spirit is God, I’m not too clear on their understanding of Jesus in relation to God, but nevertheless they deny the Trinity, thereby separating themselves from Christianity.
Someone Please
Correct Me If I’m Wrong.
It’s wrong. The Coptic Orthodox most certainly **ARE **Christian. How else would one explain this: [cnewa.org /default.aspx?ID=99&pagetypeID=9&sitecode=HQ&pageno=1](http://www.cnewa.org /default.aspx?ID=99&pagetypeID=9&sitecode=HQ&pageno=1) among other things?

It might be helpful to do a search through the EC forum and look for references.
The Coptic Catholic Church, I believe, is an offshoot of the Orthodox Church that decided to enter into communion with the Roman Catholic Church, so they are Christian, just a different “rite” so I understand it? Coptic Rite?
No, The Coptic CC is a Church sui juris. Here again, a search through the EC forum and look might be heplful.
 
Well I don’t know much about the Franciscans, but the Coptic Orthodox Church is actually not Christian, believe it or not. They deny that the Holy Spirit is God, I’m not too clear on their understanding of Jesus in relation to God, but nevertheless they deny the Trinity, thereby separating themselves from Christianity.
Someone Please
Correct Me If I’m
Wrong.
The Coptic Catholic Church, I believe, is an offshoot of the Orthodox Church that decided to enter into communion with the Roman Catholic Church, so they are Christian, just a different “rite” so I understand it? Coptic Rite?
No no this is all completely incorrect. The Coptic Orthodox are Non-Chalcedonian, meaning they follow Cyril’s Christology and have a different expression of how to explain the relationship between Divinity and Humanity of Jesus. A Coptic Orthodox would most assuredly take great offense of being accused of Macedonianism.
 
Well I don’t know much about the Franciscans, but the Coptic Orthodox Church is actually not Christian, believe it or not. They deny that the Holy Spirit is God, I’m not too clear on their understanding of Jesus in relation to God, but nevertheless they deny the Trinity, thereby separating themselves from Christianity.
Someone Please
Correct Me If I’m
Wrong.
The Coptic Catholic Church, I believe, is an offshoot of the Orthodox Church that decided to enter into communion with the Roman Catholic Church, so they are Christian, just a different “rite” so I understand it? Coptic Rite?
The Coptic Orthodox Church accepts the Trinity. The controversy is that people later thought that a mixture of God and man was what was meant when the Coptic Orthodox said one nature. This is not true. They adhere to Doctor of the Church, St Cyril of Alexandria’s teaching that Christ has one nature without confusion or mixture, fully God and fully man.

“…it is also said that in Christ dwelt all the fullness of the Godhead bodily; but we understand that he became flesh, not just as he is said to dwell in the saints, but we define that that tabernacling in him was according to equality. But being made one in nature [Greek: κατὰ φύσιν], and not converted into flesh, he made his indwelling in such a way, as we may say that the soul of man does in his own body.” - Council of Ephesus, Session I, The Epistle of St Cyril of Alexandria to Nestorius

Hermias: Have they therefore been confused and both become one nature?
Cyril: But who will be thus distraught and unlearned as to suppose that either the Divine Nature of the Word has been turned into what it was not, or that the flesh went over by way of change into the Nature of the Word Himself (for it is impossible)? but we say that One is the SON and One His Nature even though He be conceived of as having assumed flesh with a rational soul. For His (as I said) hath the human nature been made, and He is conceived of by us none otherwise than thus, God alike and man. - St Cyril of Alexandria, That Christ is One

Hermias: There will then be not two natures, of God and of man?
Cyril: Godhead and manhood are one thing and another, according to the mode [of being] existing in each, yet in Christ have they come together, in unwonted wise and passing understanding, unto union, without confusion and turning. But wholly incomprehensible is the mode of the Union. - St Cyril of Alexandria, That Christ is One

Hermias: And how out of two things, Godhead and manhood, will One Christ be conceived of?
Cyril: In no other wise (I suppose) than that whereby the things brought together one to another unto a union indissoluble and above comprehension will be One. - St Cyril of Alexandria, That Christ is One

Hermias: But if we say that the Nature of the Son is One, even though He be conceived of as Incarnate, all need is there to confess that confusion and commixture take place the nature of man being lost as it were within Him. For what is the nature of man unto the excellency of Godhead?
Cyril: In highest degree, my friend, is he an idle talker who says that confusion and commixture have place, if one Nature of the Son Incarnate and made man, is confessed by us: for one will not be able to make proof thereof by needful and true deductions. But if they set their own. will as a law to us, they devised a counsel which they cannot establish, for we must give heed, not to them but to the God-inspired Scripture… - St Cyril of Alexandria, That Christ is One

Wherefore, we say that the two natures were united, from which there is the one and only Son and Lord, Jesus Christ, as we accept in our thoughts; but after the union, since the distinction into two is done away with, we believe that there is one nature of the Son, as one, however, one who became man and was made flesh. But if being God the Word he is said to be incarnate and to be made man, let the suspicion of a change be cast somewhere far away, for he has remained what he was, and let the entirely unconfused union be confessed on our part. - St Cyril of Alexandria, Letter 40:14
 
The Coptic Orthodox Church accepts the Trinity. The controversy is that people later thought that a mixture of God and man was what was meant when the Coptic Orthodox said one nature. This is not true. They adhere to Doctor of the Church, St Cyril of Alexandria’s teaching that Christ has one nature without confusion or mixture, fully God and fully man.
For whatever reason, the link I posted earlier didn’t seem to work. This one should:
cnewa.org/default.aspx?ID=99&pagetypeID=9&sitecode=HQ/&pageno=1

I might also suggest a little google and even some wikipedia.
So the COC believes full that the Holy Spirit is the third person of the Trinity, Father Son & Holy Spirit all three being coeternal? This is what I got from Wikipedia, though wiki. is not 100% reliable, I realize that possibility:
In the year AD 381, Pope Timothy I of Alexandria presided over the second ecumenical council known as the Ecumenical Council of Constantinople, to judge Macedonius, who denied the Divinity of the Holy Spirit.
 
So the COC believes full that the Holy Spirit is the third person of the Trinity, Father Son & Holy Spirit all three being coeternal? This is what I got from Wikipedia, though wiki. is not 100% reliable, I realize that possibility:

In the year AD 381, Pope Timothy I of Alexandria presided over the second ecumenical council known as the Ecumenical Council of Constantinople, to judge Macedonius, who denied the Divinity of the Holy Spirit.
I don’t get your confusion. Even if we were to take the Wikipedia quote at face value, Pope Timothy, the Coptic patriarch judged the heretic. How does this point at all to the Copts denying the divinity of the Holy Spirit?
 
So the COC believes full that the Holy Spirit is the third person of the Trinity, Father Son & Holy Spirit all three being coeternal?
Yes.
This is what I got from Wikipedia, though wiki. is not 100% reliable, I realize that possibility:
The case presented was not a condemnation of the Coptic Church. Please refer to Denho’s earlier post. A Copt would most definitely take offense at such a false allegation.
 
So the COC believes full that the Holy Spirit is the third person of the Trinity, Father Son & Holy Spirit all three being coeternal? This is what I got from Wikipedia, though wiki. is not 100% reliable, I realize that possibility:
St Timothy I of Alexandria [then leader of the pre-schism Coptic Church] presided over the 2nd Ecumenical Council and condemned a heretic. The Coptic Church worships one God in three Person: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit just as we do.
 
I don’t get your confusion. Even if we were to take the Wikipedia quote at face value, Pope Timothy, the Coptic patriarch judged the heretic. How does this point at all to the Copts denying the divinity of the Holy Spirit?
Not talking about all Copts, but the Coptic Orthodox teaches that I believe. Am I wrong?
 
Not talking about all Copts, but the Coptic Orthodox teaches that I believe. Am I wrong?
It’s wrong. The Coptic Orthodox Church confesses the Holy and Glorious Trinity: Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. Please refer back to posts by Zekariya, porthos11, Denho, and even my earlier posts.
 
Well I don’t know much about the Franciscans, but the Coptic Orthodox Church is actually not Christian, believe it or not. They deny that the Holy Spirit is God, I’m not too clear on their understanding of Jesus in relation to God, but nevertheless they deny the Trinity, thereby separating themselves from Christianity.
Someone Please
Correct Me If I’m
Wrong.
The Coptic Catholic Church, I believe, is an offshoot of the Orthodox Church that decided to enter into communion with the Roman Catholic Church, so they are Christian, just a different “rite” so I understand it? Coptic Rite?
You are absolutely wrong and mistaken (nearly) as much as possible. They are definitely Christians and sorry, but you are very offensively lying about them. At least read something before stating such things. And something better than a manual for militant and ignorant yokels.

And Coptic Catholics are definitely Catholics, they are NOT part of “corresponding” Oriental Orthodox church. (However they relate.) Coptic Catholic Church is sui iuris like Melkintes, Maronite or Latins are. They use their own rite and so on. Their head is patriarch of Alexandria and the whole Africa (to this patriarchal see also belongs title “pope” as to the Rome). And in a way their patriarch is the second ranking catholic bishop in the world, immediately after Pope of Rome. (You can discuss how it is with College of Cardinals but reading different canons at the same time seems to me that there is not simple linear structure in the Catholic church.) Use YouTube and find for example inauguration masses of HH Benedict XVI and HH Francis and you can see Coptic Patriarch being one of the top concelebrants standing just next to the Pope. And in the St Peter’s tomb probably as well.
 
…and sorry, but you are very offensively lying about them.
To say I am lying is to say that I did not say “Someone Please Correct Me If I’m Wrong.”

I’m glad that I’m being corrected, but to go so far as to say that I’m lying,
because I even enlarged the text requesting correction if needed.
 
To say I am lying is to say that I did not say “Someone Please Correct Me If I’m Wrong.”

I’m glad that I’m being corrected, but to go so far as to say that I’m lying,
because I even enlarged the text requesting correction if needed.
I think the problem is that, you asked to be corrected if wrong, and many here have gracefully corrected you as you asked, but yet you persist in the misinformation. It is as if you are refusing to be corrected even though you asked for it.
 
I think the problem is that, you asked to be corrected if wrong, and many here have gracefully corrected you as you asked, but yet you persist in the misinformation. It is as if you are refusing to be corrected even though you asked for it.
Thank you! That was a very nice way of putting it. 😉
 
I think the problem is that, you asked to be corrected if wrong, and many here have gracefully corrected you as you asked, but yet you persist in the misinformation. It is as if you are refusing to be corrected even though you asked for it.
Oh…Didn’t mean to “persist”, but was simply seeking clarification.
My bad, I’m sorry.
Someone said to check wikipedia, so I did, then waited for confirmation.
Again, My Bad.
 
General Reminder:

This discussion strayed from its original topic. When the tenor became uncharitable, 16 posts were removed from the thread. Please return to the original topic under discussion. Thank you for your understanding and cooperation.

May God Bless You Abundantly,
Catherine Grant
Eastern Catholicism Moderator
 
Coptic Christians can be a generic reference to ALL Apostolic Christians (native non-protestant) of Egyptian ancestry. The Orthodox Copts are most in number. Catholic Copts are those of the Orthodox who reunited with Rome some time historically and became Eastern Catholic. Franciscans are a Latin-Rite Order within Egypt who have some missions for helping the poor, schools, etc. There are also some Eastern Catholic Copts working in the Franciscan Order.
There are also ethnic Copts who are neither Catholic nor Orthodox. Most of whom claim to be Coptic Christians, even tho’ they are protestants.

It’s a term with multiple meanings.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top