Please give me an opinion on this article i just read and not able to understand it

  • Thread starter Thread starter wisdomseeker
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
W

wisdomseeker

Guest
opinion/commentary
We Should Celebrate Darwin
By Sister Paula Gonzalez, S.C., Ph.D.
Source: St. Anthony Messenger
Published: Tuesday, November 24, 2009 Email | Print | Size: A A | ShareThis| Rate this:

No rating

Many scientists since Darwin’s time have realized that scientific searching can result in the awesome realization that creation is an ongoing process, set in motion by an Eternal Creator.

In 1881, only 10 years after Darwin published The Descent of Man, Pierre Teilhard de Chardin was born in France. After extensive study of hominid fossils and early human societies, this Jesuit paleontologist in 1938 completed his most important work, The Phenomenon of Man. His religious superiors found his thinking unorthodox and forbade him to publish.

After Teilhard’s death in 1955, many of his works began to be translated and published. He originated the concept that humans are a phenomenon of Earth’s evolutionary adventure, which is moving toward the Omega Point, the Cosmic Christ. The influence of Teilhard’s ideas has been far-reaching because very early he integrated broad scientific knowledge with a deep sensitivity to religious values.

At vespers on July 24, 2009, Pope Benedict XVI preached about God’s power and goodness. He said: “The role of the priesthood is to consecrate the world so that it may become a living host, a liturgy: so that the liturgy may not be something alongside the reality of the world, but that the world itself shall become a living host, a liturgy. This is also the great vision of Teilhard de Chardin: In the end we shall achieve a true cosmic liturgy, where the cosmos becomes a living host.”

Influenced by Teilhard’s work, the late Thomas Berry, a Passionist priest who called himself a geologian, recently has provided our 21st-century world with timely wisdom. His agreement with Teilhard’s idea that “we must consciously will the further stages of the evolutionary process” is clear in Berry’s major book, The Great Work: Our Way Into the Future.

As a cultural historian, he was eminently qualified to state: “Natural selection can no longer function as it has in the past. Cultural selection is now a decisive force in determining the future of the biosystems of the Earth.”

To a large extent, the further development of the human family in what Berry described as the “sacred Earth community”—the entire created universe—is in our hands.

Our times require that all of us appreciate our part in this great work of cocreation. As Father Berry explained in 1999, “The Great Work now, as we move into a new millennium, is to carry out the transition from a period of human devastation to a period when humans would be present to the planet in a mutually beneficent manner. We cannot doubt that we too have been given the intellectual vision, the spiritual insight and even the physical resources we need for carrying out this transition.”

The evolutionary adventure continues!

Click here to read the rest of the article.

Sister Paula Gonzalez, S.C., Ph.D., taught biology at the College of Mount St. Joseph in Cincinnati, Ohio, for 20 years. An environmentalist, she is a cofounder and board member of Ohio Interfaith Power and Light. A presenter of many workshops and retreats in the United States and Canada, she lives in a former chicken barn that is solar-heated.
 
Could you be more specific about what you find obscure?

To me it sounds rather Hegelian. But what she seems to be saying is that before Darwin, there was a static view of creation. God, outside of time, produced creation, which was essentially the same throughout it’s historical unfolding.

But suddenly with Darwin there is an idea that time in the universe has a real purpose. God is still the creator and sustainer at each moment, and each moment is real and true, but within the universe new parts of Gods creation and plan become manifest over time.

This is exciting, partly because it means we will see really new things, and because it reveals an even more essential purpose to time than was previously understood.

The article also seems to think it suggest that there may be some even more spiritually integrated or developed end-state that we are moving towards.
 
A lot of heterodox people these days couch heresy in ambiguos language. The liberal minded take the complex and make it impossible to understand. The orthodox take the complex and put it in terms the average joe can understand.

Who cares about Teilhard Chardin. So What. I wouldn’t waste my time.
 
Hey, man, like, you know, you can will yourself into evolving into cosmic consciousness. Way! No way…Hey, man, like, you know, you can create a paradigm of evolution that precedes the timeless past. You know, like the evolutionistas hoax of Piltdown Man, creating a reality that shoulda woulda coulda been but wasn’t. Hey, man, like, you know, this Grumpy Old Man didn’t even like Christmas in New York!

So, godlets, you don’t create your own reality. Sorry! You won’t evolve into the cosmic consciousness. Sorry. You aren’t your own Savior. You won’t melt into personality-obliterating Nirvana upon death. But the good news is that women can be taken into Heaven by the Most High without even reincarnating as a male first.

Blowhard de Chardin, when criticized for bad poetry, claimed to be a scientist; when criticized for bad science, claimed to be a poet. That’s the only lesson to be learned. When attacked, evolve into Jello.
 
Could you be more specific about what you find obscure?

To me it sounds rather Hegelian. But what she seems to be saying is that before Darwin, there was a static view of creation. God, outside of time, produced creation, which was essentially the same throughout it’s historical unfolding.

But suddenly with Darwin there is an idea that time in the universe has a real purpose. God is still the creator and sustainer at each moment, and each moment is real and true, but within the universe new parts of Gods creation and plan become manifest over time.

This is exciting, partly because it means we will see really new things, and because it reveals an even more essential purpose to time than was previously understood.

The article also seems to think it suggest that there may be some even more spiritually integrated or developed end-state that we are moving towards.
So, we should celebrate Darwin?
 
A lot of heterodox people these days couch heresy in ambiguos language. The liberal minded take the complex and make it impossible to understand. The orthodox take the complex and put it in terms the average joe can understand.

Who cares about Teilhard Chardin. So What. I wouldn’t waste my time.
it seems to me that lately we have more and more women becoming theologians and teachers in the Church.
 
So, we should celebrate Darwin?
Well, I guess from the point of view of the writer, yes, in the same way one might celebrate anyone who opened up a new way of thinking that is interesting and beautiful.

I am not sure I am on board with where the article goes, personally. I think Darwin was a very interesting fellow though, and he clearly made a huge revolution in the way the average person thinks.
 
Well, I guess from the point of view of the writer, yes, in the same way one might celebrate anyone who opened up a new way of thinking that is interesting and beautiful.

I am not sure I am on board with where the article goes, personally. I think Darwin was a very interesting fellow though, and he clearly made a huge revolution in the way the average person thinks.
I don’t like Darwin, because he seems to be a person to rally around for the athiestic secular humanist folks. Also, a lot of his assumptions have just proven not to be true. The greatest deaths in the 20th century were perpetrated by people who used Darwin to justify part of their beliefs (as well as Karl Marx).

So this thanksgiving I’m not giving thanks for Darwin.
 
True and authentic scientific research is based on experiment, observation, and deduction - something that Darwinism doesn’t do, which is why the concept of evolution as we know it has fallen apart. It is the same with global warming. Consensus is NOT science, and can only result in faulty and ‘bad’ science. Darwinists and globalists are very much guilty of “cooking the books”, that is, manipulating data, to suit their own pet theories.

What we can celebrate is the incredible diversity of living things in our world that seem to never end - we are discovering new species practically every day! To me, that is the beauty of God’s world, and one doesn’t have to embrace evolution to appreciate the magnificence of God’s creation or its complexity.
 
I don’t like Darwin, because he seems to be a person to rally around for the athiestic secular humanist folks. Also, a lot of his assumptions have just proven not to be true. The greatest deaths in the 20th century were perpetrated by people who used Darwin to justify part of their beliefs (as well as Karl Marx).

So this thanksgiving I’m not giving thanks for Darwin.
I’m not sure that it is Darwin’s fault about how secular humanists try to use his ideas. Any more than when people try to use Christian ideas to justify evil acts, or in other inappropriate ways - it really says nothing about the ideas so much as the people trying to use them. I also think that it is sad that Darwin himself had such difficulty with his religious understanding as a result of his research and scientific insight, because it was probably totally unnecessary. But given the nature of what he had been taught about religion, it is quite understandable that this could create a religious crisis for him.

Certianly some of Darwin’s ideas about evolution have been changed by subsequent researchers. I am not sure why this would be considered odd, as it is normal in science, as well as in philosophy and theology. Do we dismiss Origen because his ideas are not well developed, or do we say that he was a very early Christian theologian , and should be understood as such? Do we fail to appreciate Augustine because we know some of his ideas about how memory works have proven to be implausible explanations in the face of further research?

Of course not. Why one would expect Darwins thoughts to be any different is beyond me.
 
The Dark Side of Darwin’s Legacy

This year marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin, and Nov. 24 marks the 150th anniversary of the publication of On the Origin of Species, the landmark work in which Darwin laid forth his theory of natural selection. While celebrations have emphasized the British naturalist’s giant role in the advancement of human progress, British political journalist Dennis Sewell is not convinced. In a new book, The Political Gene: How Darwin’s Ideas Changed Politics, he highlights how often — and how easily — Darwin’s big idea has been harnessed for sinister political ends. According to Sewell, evolution is scientifically undeniable, but its contribution to human well-being is unclear.
**Should we reassess Darwin’s legacy?

more…**
 
Personally, I think, the good Sister has her nuts stored in the wrong tree.
He asserted that different races of mankind had traveled different distances along the evolutionary path — white Caucasians were at the top of the racial hierarchy, while black and brown people ranked below. [Racism] was a widespread prejudice in British society at the time, but he presented racial hierarchy as a matter of science. He also held that the poor were genetically second-rate — which inspired eugenics.
As Always, just my thoughts
 
True and authentic scientific research is based on experiment, observation, and deduction - something that Darwinism doesn’t do, which is why the concept of evolution as we know it has fallen apart. It is the same with global warming. Consensus is NOT science, and can only result in faulty and ‘bad’ science. Darwinists and globalists are very much guilty of “cooking the books”, that is, manipulating data, to suit their own pet theories.

What we can celebrate is the incredible diversity of living things in our world that seem to never end - we are discovering new species practically every day! To me, that is the beauty of God’s world, and one doesn’t have to embrace evolution to appreciate the magnificence of God’s creation or its complexity.
👍👍
 
And, your point is???
dont worry i am not degrading women. women have other roles in society and they cannot be priests, deacons, or Bishops. but i see a quick advanced of women roles in the Church in these days. as we know many women are trying to become priests in the CC. this is one more problem for the Church. we must be watchfull if this is not sneaking on us suddenly.

Peace.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top