Please help me understand the different types of grace

  • Thread starter Thread starter mgoforth
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

mgoforth

Guest
I’ve been reading St. Thomas Aquinas lately, and I’m having trouble understanding the different types of grace…like efficient grace vs sufficient grace. Can someone tell me how many different types the Church recognizes and what they mean?

Thanks!
 
I’ve been reading St. Thomas Aquinas lately, and I’m having trouble understanding the different types of grace…like efficient grace vs sufficient grace. Can someone tell me how many different types the Church recognizes and what they mean?

Thanks!
Have you checked the Catechism of the Catholic Church?

check this out and see if it helps.

newadvent.org/cathen/06689a.htm

:rolleyes:
 
I’ve been reading St. Thomas Aquinas lately, and I’m having trouble understanding the different types of grace…like efficient grace vs sufficient grace. Can someone tell me how many different types the Church recognizes and what they mean?

Thanks!
Mgoforth:

Look up “sufficient grace” in the New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia. (It confuse you even more, so it will take a couple of readings.)

Sufficient grace, from my memory, is that grace every human being receives from God by virtue of our being created (being given the gift of life). It allows us, if we’re willing, to receive all other graces throughout our lives. However, if God sees that we will not want any of the other graces throughout our lives, he will not waste them on us. So, essentially, like any “gift,” if it’s not wanted and no more will be ‘appreciated’ down the road, we won’t recieve any more graces.

If I’m a little off, perhaps you will come back and make it clearer.

God bless,
jd
 
Mgoforth:

Look up “sufficient grace” in the New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia. (It confuse you even more, so it will take a couple of readings.)

Sufficient grace, from my memory, is that grace every human being receives from God by virtue of our being created (being given the gift of life). It allows us, if we’re willing, to receive all other graces throughout our lives. However, if God sees that we will not want any of the other graces throughout our lives, he will not waste them on us. So, essentially, like any “gift,” if it’s not wanted and no more will be ‘appreciated’ down the road, we won’t recieve any more graces.

If I’m a little off, perhaps you will come back and make it clearer.

God bless,
jd
Thanks JD. That goes along with the section of the Summa Theologica that inspired this question about graces. I was reading about predestination and reprobation, and I couldn’t fathom what St Thomas was trying to say about God withholding the graces that the reprobate would need to get to heaven.

Your explanation suggests something to me. Perhaps what St Thomas meant was that God provides what He knows (from the eternal viewpoint) is enough grace - sufficient grace - but doesn’t provide the extra graces that would ultimately help the person reach heaven because the person doesn’t ask for them? I’ll have to ponder that.

Thanks!
 
Thanks JD. That goes along with the section of the Summa Theologica that inspired this question about graces. I was reading about predestination and reprobation, and I couldn’t fathom what St Thomas was trying to say about God withholding the graces that the reprobate would need to get to heaven.

Your explanation suggests something to me. Perhaps what St Thomas meant was that God provides what He knows (from the eternal viewpoint) is enough grace - sufficient grace - but doesn’t provide the extra graces that would ultimately help the person reach heaven because the person doesn’t ask for them? I’ll have to ponder that.

Thanks!
Mgoforth:

That’s my take. But, don’t get too wrapped around the axle on this. The Church, which after all hold the keys to the kingdom, is not quite as stringent as the Calvinist interpretation.

God bless,
jd
 
I’ve been reading St. Thomas Aquinas lately, and I’m having trouble understanding the different types of grace…like efficient grace vs sufficient grace. Can someone tell me how many different types the Church recognizes and what they mean?

Thanks!
Hi Mgoforth,
Recently I became interested in the subject of ‘grace’ from a philosophical view rather than from a the more commonly found theological view. Here is what I arrived at:

The subject can be sliced up into a plethora of categories. For example you might run across grace described as: sanctifying, habitual, actual, efficacious, efficient, sanating, sufficient, justifying, gratuitous, sacramental, and probably a couple of others that I am not aware of. Apparently the definition of each is fair game for any theologian that cares to address the subject and consequently there is much overlapping of meanings.

However, to make sense of the subject I found it beneficial to attempt a separation and categorization, keeping in mind the general definition that grace is a gift from God freely given that can be used or rejected. With that in mind we can recognize three main categories: sanctifying, actual, and sacramental. The main distinction between *Sanctifying Grace *and *Actual Grace *is that the former is permanently given and the latter is temporarily given to address certain situations that confront us. *Sacramental Grace *can be either permanent as is baptism or temporary as is penance.

Sanctifying Grace, the spiritual state of being infused by God, which permanently inheres in the soul and induces justification (our path from original sin to Godliness) by orientating one’s life toward God. The most prominent form is Habitual Grace, which is manifested in us as a gift of the mental state called ‘wonder’. We accept this gift through our actions such as study, contemplation, and discovery, which when focused on God’s other gifts of life and the beauty our milieu, is rewarded with a feeling of “awe”.

Sacramental Grace, the spiritual state infused by God through reception of the sacraments, is manifested in us as a mental state called “piety”. We accept this gift through our actions such as worship and prayer, which when performed sincerely is rewarded with a feeling of “peace”. Justifying Grace is that which restores a person to God’s friendship such as through the Sacramental Grace received for the first time as in baptism or after baptism in penance. *Gratuitous Grace *is that given to particular persons for the salvation of others such as the sacrament of Holy Orders that confers the priest power of consecration and absolution and the Sacrament of Matrimony, which in my case conferred my wife with the grace to affect my salvation.

Actual Grace, the spiritual state temporarily infused by God to enlighten the mind or strengthen the will to perform actions that increase one’s justification, is manifested in us as a mental state called “love”. Love induces a wide variety of actions, which can be generalized as the action of “sacrifice”. True sacrifice always is rewarded with a feeling of “joy”. Sufficient Grace is Actual Grace that may or may not be accepted . *Efficient or Efficacious Grace *is Actual Grace that has been accepted and acted upon through sacrifice and is rewarded with a feeling of joy. *Sanating Grace *is Actual Grace in its function of healing the ravages of sin, original and personal, in human nature.

Keep in mind that this was my personal “philosophical” approach to making some meaning to the concept of Grace and I will back off gladly anything I have written that may conflict with the theological view. However I will not depart from my practice of wonder, piety (I’m a devout Catholic), and sacrifice that has given me a lifetime of awe, peace, and joy.

Hope this helps.

Yppop
 
Mgoforth:

That’s my take. But, don’t get too wrapped around the axle on this. The Church, which after all hold the keys to the kingdom, is not quite as stringent as the Calvinist interpretation.

God bless,
jd
I agree. My frustration was because I was doing a good job understanding the book up until that point. It was really my pride I think, telling me “you MUST figure this out”… I need to learn to accept on faith those teachings of the Church that I don’t yet understand and might never understand fully. That’s a big work-in-progress for me.
 
Hi Mgoforth,
Recently I became interested in the subject of ‘grace’ from a philosophical view rather than from a the more commonly found theological view. Here is what I arrived at:



Hope this helps.

Yppop
That’s a really great explanation, yppop. Thanks so much for taking the time to go into that much detail!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top