J
jessiem
Guest
This is a wonderful thread even for current Catholics! As a cradle Catholic who has just in recent years come to truly love the faith, I have genuinely benefited from reading these replies, particularly Rory’s. :yup:
Hi Paige!Hello, everyone.
Not a good place to start the discussion - I highly recommend you start with some basics first and then progressively move into the more difficult topics…like this one.(1) Virgin Mary. As you all probably already know, Protestants do not hold to the perpetual virginity of Mary. I’m not sure about it, but I can submit to church teachings on this. However, I do not see in the Bible where Mary is born free of sin, assumed into heaven, and crowned Queen of Heaven.
This is a belief you need to address on several levels. First - did you get this belief from the bible itself or from someone else? If you got it from someone else, where did they get it from and how do we know we can trust them? Secondly, and you may find this outrageous, you need to understand that the Bible does not identify itself as “God’s true word” anywhere, and the question becomes who told you that the Bible (especially the NT) is “God’s true word”? When you start to honestly and logically approach your acceptance of the “Bible” as God’s true word you will realize that at some point the Bible was compiled by someone. Who, exactly, was it that compiled the bible? When, exactly did they do it? How do you know? The answers to these questions form the basis for acceptance of other truths of the faith - even when those truths arent perfectly clear in Scripture.As a Protestant, I believe that if it’s not in the Bible (i.e., God’s true word ), then even if it’s beneficial, I can only accept it as completely reliable if it is compatible with the Bible.
Again, I wouldnt focus on Mary yet. Start with the basics. But for what its worth, Jesus didnt “come to us” he, in his infinite wisdom, was born of the virgin Mary. Without Mary there would be no Jesus of Nazareth.My understanding of the Catholic view of Mary is that she is a mediatrix between us and Jesus, and this is my major stumbling block. My view is that Jesus came to us in order to bring us to God;
We dont need her, but her prayers are beneficial to us - now and at the hour of our death.He is our mediator and our advocate. When he died, the veil in the temple was torn from top to bottom (Mark 15:38), signifying that there was no longer a division between God and us, and that we are able to be in His presence directly. Even though I do believe that Mary is a saint and worthy of our admiration, I don’t believe that she has anything to do with whether or not Jesus hears my prayers, or the final disposition of my soul when I die (… pray for us sinners now and at the hour of our death.) I don’t understand why we *need *her intercession, when Jesus died for us and the Holy Spirit is constantly with us. This leads me to my second problem …
It isnt necessary, but it is beneficial. God is all about relationships - He is not all about “you and me only and forget everyone else”. We - you, me and all the Saints - are one body in Christ.(2) Praying to saints. The actual prayers to saints do not disturb me. Remembering the exceptional examples of the saints is a good thing to do, and emulating their examples is admirable. But the issue I have with Mary is very close to the issue of asking saints to intercede with God for me. Why is this necessary?
You only “need” to confess to a Priest when you have committed a mortal sin. The forgiveness of sins in the form of binding and loosing was given to the Apostles by Christ. They passed this gift on to their successors by the laying on of hands. Priests are successors to the Apostles and carry on this gift.(3) Do Catholics HAVE to confess to priests before receiving communion? I have no problem with examining my soul, confessing to the Lord, and asking for forgiveness from Him before coming to receive communion. That’s something that Catholics and Protestants have in common. And I think it’s good to confess to God with another person (priest, deacon, whoever) present, so that we have good accountability and someone to discuss ways to avoid sin in the future, but I don’t understand the absolute requirement of confessing to a priest.
Matt 16:18 Specifically addresses Peters primacy among the Apostles. This primacy stems from the office Peter has as “prime minister” of God’s Kingdom here on earth. If whatever Peter(or the successor to his office) “binds on earth is bound in Heaven” it must be, by definition, Gods Will. How can God “bind” something in Heaven if it is not “perfect”? He cannot - it would contradict his Justice. Therefore, whatever Peter binds must be perfect - aka infallible - and the only way that can happen is if he is protected by the Holy Spirit from error.Infallibility of the Pope. I know that this does not mean that the Pope isn’t a sinner or that he doesn’t need Jesus just like every other human being. I do understand it means that when the Pope makes a theological statement, that the Holy Spirit keeps him from making a mistake. Is this an accurate description of the Pope’s infallibility? If so, then please explain to me where this doctrine comes from.
(5) And the last thing today … is it true that to become Catholic, that a person is required to agree with everything the Church teaches? I ask this because I have some reservations and if I’m required to agree with every last thing the Church teaches, then I don’t know if I’m ever going to be able to be a Catholic. I don’t see how anyone can 100% agree with any church, because we’re all fallen, sinful individuals.
Actually, I think that’s enough… for now at least.![]()
There are some fundamentals that you need to agree with - you dont necessarily need to understand them perfectly. It’s practically impossible to even know “everything the Church teaches” let alone agree with it.God’s blessings on us all,
Paige